The remaining nuns vow to keep fighting Katy Perry & the LA archdiocese

American Idol episode 1 as seen on ABC.

I now have a much better understanding of this Katy Perry-vs-the nuns drama. In 2015, Katy Perry went through what she thought were the right legal channels to purchase the historic property of the Order of the Immaculate Heart of the Blessed Virgin Mary in LA. The archdiocese agreed to Katy’s terms and sold her the property for $15 million. The problem was that the nuns had the receipts that they actually owned the property and they could sell it to whomever they wanted, and they didn’t want to sell it to Katy, they wanted to sell it to a real estate developer for pennies on the dollar. For years, Katy, the nuns and the archdiocese have been locked in legal battles. Then, more than a week ago, the main nun collapsed and died in court. Most people thought this prolonged legal battle was over. And it is, although one of the nuns is still alive and speaking to the media about how she’s broke and she can’t afford health care. She’s also vowing to keep fighting.

Struggling with ill-health, including breast cancer, Sister Rita Callanan looks into her pantry for scraps of food and sees, yet again, only cereal. Her bank balance is zero, her healthcare cheque has bounced on more than one occasion and she’s not sure who’s going to foot the bill for her next round of cancer treatment. Now 80 years old, she scratches her head in bemusement as to how this has all happened. A few years ago, she had hundreds of thousands in the bank and was a paper millionaire.

As one of the few remaining sisters alive, who belong to the historic Order of the Immaculate Heart of the Blessed Virgin Mary in Los Angeles, her future was secure. Their historic convent sits in the uber trendy Los Angeles suburb of Los Feliz and is today worth in excess of £10 million. That is until Katy Perry came along. The 32-year-old singer tried to buy it without the nuns’ permission. She agreed a deal with the Royal Catholic Archbishop of Los Angeles (RCA), headed by Archbishop Jose Gomez, who claims the convent is under its ownership and sold it to Perry for £10 million in July 2015. But two nuns took exception to this. Sister Callanan and her fellow Sister Catherine Rose Holzman, 89 – a combined age of 169 years – claimed that it’s been the Order’s property for 45 years and it’s their right to sell it. They found a buyer in property developer Dana Hollister.

On Friday, in the latest round of the epic court battle, Sister Holzmann tragically collapsed and died in the Los Angeles courtroom. Now only Sister Callanan remains in the fight against Perry and the RCA. Sister Callanan has vowed to keep on fighting and asked the public to help the cause, setting up a GoFundMe page to help with their legal costs. She says: ‘On March 9th, 2018 we tragically lost Sister Catherine Rose, my beloved fellow IHM Sister and original organizer of this GoFundMe campaign. She was my cherished partner in this ongoing legal battle to keep our convent. It is now more important than ever to continue this fight and for our cause to prevail.’

Sister Callanan says: ‘All we are asking is to sell our own property, keep our own money so we can take care of ourselves until the last person dies, then the money and property can go to the archbishop. There’s not many more years, give me a break. He’s supposed to be a chief shepherd.’

In 2005, Archbishop was supposedly given the go-ahead by the Vatican to take control of the convent although this point is now being disputed. A ‘pontifical commissary’ was put in place – like a conservator of the estate – who assumes responsibility for the sisters. But Sister Callanan says: ‘He claimed that Rome gave him permission, now we did a lot of research and Rome has done research, and these claims, this letter to give him authority was not from Rome, but a friend of the archbishop’s.

According to Sister Callanan, he started ‘sending us to retirement homes, one by one, separately, so we weren’t a unit.’ She says all their bank accounts were closed – they each had upwards of £215,000 in their accounts. ‘All these years of my religious life, I would never have expected to be fighting an archbishop to keep our own property and money, so we can care for ourselves. We don’t want the archbishop handling our money.’

[From The Daily Mail]

I’d suggest you go and read the full Daily Mail interview because OMG what’s happening to these remaining nuns is so shady, and very little of it is Katy Perry’s fault. Katy Perry’s boobs are a smokescreen for a very shady battle in which the archbishop seemingly took advantage of a group of very old nuns, all of whom have serious health problems. All they wanted to do was live out the rest of their days on this property which they believed they owned, or at the very least, they should be consulted about who bought the property. Sister Callanan isn’t blaming Katy Perry – the sister directs her ire at the archbishop who seems hellbent on destroying these old nuns’ lives. That being said… I’m pretty sure that there’s no longer any legal fight left to wage over the historic property. At this point, the nuns are just trying to live out their final days with some dignity and comfort.

American Idol episode 2 as seen on ABC.

Photos courtesy of ABC and WENN.

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

19 Responses to “The remaining nuns vow to keep fighting Katy Perry & the LA archdiocese”

Comments are Closed

We close comments on older posts to fight comment spam.

  1. Wiffie says:

    Shady old male Catholic figurehead uses and blames young woman to take advantage of and financially and emotionally abuse other women, and publicly stays out of the mess? Sounds about right, historically speaking.

    Gross.

  2. Sam the pink says:

    At this point, I have to ask – why does Katy even persist in this sale? I get that she probably has money tied up in the agreement of sale and would stand to lose some if the deal fell through, but this just seems far more trouble then it’s worth.

    I also wonder if the parties are really open to compromise. There are ways of selling the property while allowing the nuns to remain in it, but I suppose that may not be an attractive solution. While I sympathize with Katy, I ultimately hope that the nuns are allowed to remain.

    • Bridget says:

      The nuns haven’t been in the property for years (it’s too expensive and they can’t care for it) but a compromise deal is already in Perry’s sale agreement. She’s building a prayer house of sorts.

    • Astrid says:

      +1

    • No Doubtful says:

      I agree, I wonder why Katy is hellbent on getting this property? Surely with her money she could find something else.

    • Digital Unicorn says:

      Katy already offered to let the Nuns live there – the property is big enough for it but her offer was still refused (the nuns admitted that her image played a part). The nuns are being badly treated by the Archdiocese but they were also being scammed by that property developer, Hollister. Who befriended them and then persuaded them to sign a contract where she only puts down a cash payment for $50k with NO stipulation/schedule for when the remaining balance was to be paid. This is one of the reasons that the LA Diocese gave when they sued the nuns and Hollister over the sale – they claimed the nuns were being scammed by Hollister and the courts agreed. The courts didn’t agree that Perry could buy it – they just cancelled the shady contract the nuns were scammed into signing.

      Have you seen the property? Its stunning and I can see why she wants to buy it.

  3. aenflex says:

    Not saying it’s Katy’s fault. We’re it me I’d let them live out their days.

    • Anastasia says:

      Yes, I would do everything I could to ensure they had health care, comfort, got their money back, etc.

      • Laura says:

        Absolutely. I would hope that she uses some of her large wealth to help out the nuns in this situation. Obviously, she doesn’t have to, it’s her own money. I feel like it would just even out her karma card if she helped these women access healthcare in the twilight of their lives.

  4. Sherry says:

    I’m an Orthodox Christian and not a Catholic, but it is my understanding that the nuns and priests do not own anything. They give up worldly things to the church and any of their needs are taken care of by the church. That’s the vows they take.

    Legally, the church owns the property, not the nuns and it’s the church’s decision what to do with that property, not the nuns.

    That said, the church should have found a place for those nuns to reside together. I think the Archdioceses dropped the ball in caring for these nuns the way they should have been cared for in their waning years.

    • Justme says:

      Actually, Religious Orders CAN And very frequently do own property. My sister is a nun and her Order has quite a bit of property which has been donated to them over the years. They take vows of personal poverty, but they can own property in common. Many orders rely on the property to take care of older members.
      Some of that is explained here: https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/acts-of-faith/wp/2015/07/14/with-religious-affiliation-on-the-decline-what-should-happen-to-hallowed-buildings/?utm_term=.c1f0e0bd34e0

      The relevant passage: “Catholic sisters take vows of poverty, but institutionally, they can be rich in real estate, schools or hospital systems. With fewer younger sisters to support the old, congregations of women religious sometimes cash in those assets.”

      • Bridget says:

        This order DOES own the property in question. The actual part that they’re fighting over is that they apparently agreed that they needed Archdiocese approval to sell the property, and the Archdiocese wants to sell to Katy while 1 of the remaining nuns wants to sell to a lady named Dana Hollister (who is super shady herself and the real estate deal is SUPER shady – the nuns are guaranteed only $44K in Hollister’s deal).

      • Sherry says:

        I understand that as an order they can own property, but that order is still under the control of the church, correct?

        What I don’t understand is what others have said, what makes the developer a preferred buyer to the nuns over Katy? It just all seems like a power grab on all sides.

      • Digital Unicorn says:

        @sherry – Hollister (the property developer) is their ‘friend’ who persuaded the nuns to sell her the property for basically nothing ($44K cash down payment). Google Dana Hollister – she’s shady af who pulled this stunt with another order of elderly nuns in the 90s, again buying a convent at a bargain basement price (and some shady behaviour to get it).

        With the Hollister deal, the nuns were only going to get an initial $44k cash payment. There was no schedule or guarantees of when the outstanding balance(s) would be paid. $44K won’t last long for a group of elderly ladies who all have different health issues.

        With Perry’s deal, she was going to pay $10million in a CASH payment to the nuns – meaning they got the whole amount to live the rest of their lives in luxury. There was an additional $5mill to cover the cost of relocating a prayer house located on the property for Jesuit priests.

        If the remaining nun wants to live out the rest of her life in peace and pay for her medical bills and not have to worry about money then she should take Katy’s money. I get that its about them standing up for themselves but lets face it, they (the nuns) admitted that they didn’t like Perry’s image and that it was one of the reason they didn’t want to sell to her. The archdiocese is being shady but as the nuns own the property they get ALL the money not the diocese – or am i missing something?

  5. Bridget says:

    Still no discussion of shady Dana Hollister?

    I have no clue whether or not the nun’s charges against the Archbishop are correct (and it’s possible that both the Archbishop and Hollister are shady) however we know for a fact that the deal this nun is pushing for us SUPER shady and is most definitely not in her best interest. But Katy Perry is what makes the story salacious, so it’s what people talk about.

  6. PunkyMomma says:

    The IHM’s were my teachers in grade school. This breaks my heart, as once again, the greedy patriarchy of the Catholic Church puts their interests over the women who devoted their lives to their calling in the name of Christ.

    Surely, Katy can let these nuns live out their days in their convent.

    Let’s not forget, it’s the Diocese of Los Angeles that found the cash ($57.5 million) to buy Robert Schuller’s Crystal Cathedral, and then asked parishioners to pony up another $50 million to renovate said behemoth.

    This stinks to high heaven, disgusted pun intended.

  7. Veronica says:

    For anybody who’s been active in Catholicism for most of their life, it really shouldn’t surprise you that the patriarchal institutions within the church take horrific and blatant advantage of the nuns. They are notorious for leaving them in poverty when the church’s coffers are spilling over.

    • Bridget says:

      Nuns take vows of poverty. It’s a part of the deal of being a nun. I have a lot of issues with how the Church views and treats nuns, but they’re not “leaving them in poverty”

  8. mollie says:

    Team Katie on this one. The nuns would have received plenty of funds on this sale. They just don’t like who it’s being sold to. Too bad.