Renee Zellweger on the Harvey Weinstein situation: ‘I didn’t feel … accostable’

renee ny magazine

Renee Zellweger is… a complicated person. I understand that she isn’t the kind of celebrity to spill her guts to every magazine in town. She was never like that, not even at the peak of her fame. Around 2010, Renee disappeared. She disappeared from films, from TV, from work. We would see paparazzi photos of her occasionally and many of us just assumed the work had dried up for her, plus the fact that she’s always kept her privacy pretty well-guarded.

In 2016, she started working again, here and there (Bridget Jones’ Baby) and at some point, we had a discussion about whether Renee had gotten plastic surgery, because her face looked noticeably different. Currently, she’s promoting Judy, the bio-pic about the last few years of Judy Garland’s life. The trailer looked terrible and absurd to me, but I keep reading good things about it. Anyway, all of that to say… I think this New York Magazine cover story is really the first in-depth interview she’s done in years. You can read the full piece here. Some highlights:

On why retreating from acting was crucial for her health: “I wasn’t healthy. I wasn’t taking care of myself. I was the last thing on my list of priorities.” She has seen a therapist during only one period of her life, she tells me, and it was back then, as she retreated from acting. “He recognized that I spent 99 percent of my life as the public persona and just a microscopic crumb of a fraction in my real life. I needed to not have something to do all the time, to not know what I’m going to be doing for the next two years in advance. I wanted to allow for some accidents. There had to be some quiet for the ideas to slip in.”

On the advice her friend Salma Hayek gave her: “She shared this beautiful … metaphor? Analogy? ‘The rose doesn’t bloom all year … unless it’s plastic.’ I got it. Because what does that mean? It means that you have to fake that you’re okay to go and do this next thing. And you probably need to stop right now, but this creative opportunity is so exciting and it’s once-in-a lifetime and you will regret not doing it. But actually, no, you should collect yourself and, you know … rest.”

On the “whole plastic surgery kerfuffle:” “It probably gives you a stomach ache, asking me about that, doesn’t it? Well, because there’s a value judgment that’s placed on us. As if it somehow is a reflection of your character— whether you’re a good person or a weak person or an authentic person,” she says. I suggest to her that there was a kind of panic people felt that she somehow did not look like herself. “And the implication that I somehow needed to change what was going on because it wasn’t working. That makes me sad. I don’t look at beauty in that way. And I don’t think of myself in that way. I like my weird quirkiness, my off-kilter mix of things. It enables me to do what I do. I don’t want to be something else. I got hired in my blue jeans and cowboy boots with my messy hair. I started working like that. I didn’t have to change to work. So why was I suddenly trying to fit into some mold that didn’t belong to me?”

On Harvey Weinstein and #metoo: “It’s a hard thing to talk about in this context. It’s such a big topic. And it’s personal and it’s not. And it’s something that’s always been there and the shift is overdue and you could feel it coming for a while and it was inevitable. And thank God. But, in some ways, I feel: Oh gosh, I allowed for the tiny cuts that just seemed like, ‘Oh, this is just how it’s always been.’ But I was never a victim of it. I always felt that I knew what to do in those circumstances. I didn’t feel … accostable. I never felt that I was being insulted, demeaned. I didn’t recognize it as that. It was jocular—it’s a joke. And then there’s that other side of it: that I love male-female banter, that playful dynamic. So, it’s a big conversation. I’m sure that I was on the receiving end of something that I don’t even know about, in conversations that I wasn’t privy to. But it wasn’t something that I felt, it wasn’t something that I was aware of. I was very surprised by some of the things that were unearthed. I didn’t know.”

On how hard it was hearing about the Weinstein revelations: “It was a very hard thing to hear about. And it was hard to accept the surprise of that. And I’m sorry that it’s hard to talk about, because this is a person that I did not know well, but I thought I knew him as I knew him. It was red carpets and a hotel lobby in passing or ‘I’ll see you at this after-party’ and ‘I’ll be there to make sure you go to promote our movie’ and ‘I’ll see you at Cannes’ or ‘I’ll see you at the French premiere’ or ‘I’ll see you in the editing room so we can pick these things apart.’ And that’s a lot, when you talk about how we worked during that decade and a half …”

[From Vulture]

Re: her plastic surgery… I took her answer to mean that she had some work done but it wasn’t so that she would look younger or get more scripts or whatever. Which… fair enough. The thing about it was that instead of just dealing with sh-t with some humor or even an outright denial/lie, Renee and her people issued a series of cryptic statements and half-denials and “how dare you notice that her face look different, SHAME” faux-feminist treatises. I mean, she got noticeable plastic surgery. It would have been a story for a few weeks no matter what, but her reaction to it was what made it an even bigger story. And that’s why she’s still being asked about it today, years later.

Re: Harvey Weinstein… he significantly helped her career. She thanked him profusely, in speech after speech, for all of his help with her career. None of that sh-t is ON HER. Weinstein preyed on some women and he didn’t prey on other women. If Renee is saying that he never behaved inappropriately towards her, I’ll believe her. But is that what she’s saying? Or is she saying that she still doesn’t really know if Weinstein was inappropriate with her? “I was never a victim of it. I always felt that I knew what to do in those circumstances. I didn’t feel … accostable. I never felt that I was being insulted, demeaned. I didn’t recognize it as that. It was jocular—it’s a joke.” That’s a terrible way to explain it, Renee. I’m sure many of Weinstein’s victims didn’t feel like they were “accostable” either.

Actress Renee Zellweger wearing an A.W.A.K.E dress, Jimmy Choo shoes, David Webb jewelry, and a William and Son clutch arrives at the 2019 Vanity Fair Oscar Party held at the Wallis Annenberg Center for the Performing Arts on February 24, 2019 in Beverly

Cover courtesy of Amanda Demme/New York Magazine, additional photos courtesy of WENN and Avalon Red.

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

40 Responses to “Renee Zellweger on the Harvey Weinstein situation: ‘I didn’t feel … accostable’”

Comments are Closed

We close comments on older posts to fight comment spam.

  1. holly hobby says:

    Wow that cover is bad. The lighting everything. She looks better in the other photo here.

    • Lady Baden-Baden says:

      I wonder if it might be deliberate? As in: look at me – I’m older, I have (a few!) wrinkles! No plastic surgery to see here!

      I mean, she obviously had something done to her face and, as Kaiser says, she acted very ‘how dare you notice!’ wherever anyone pointed it out – so I wonder if this is an attempt to ‘prove’ some kind of point?

      • SM says:

        @Lady Baden-Baden, I think you might be right. Now she can go around and answer the question about her surgery with non reply of: “I showed my wrinkles on magazine cover and how dare you, are you implying you have a problem with my face, it’s you you is implying I need a new face”.

    • SM says:

      And judging from these quotes, the interview is not much better. Her “how dare you say I am so vain to get a plastic surgery” routine is getting exhausting. Are supposed to think that by denying the reasons for it she denies having any surgery? And that Weinstein thing is a mess. I don’t understand what she was getting at. That she did not know about him? Are we still there? Separating people into separate boxes according to who knew what and attributing blame to women?

    • smcollins says:

      She looks like Dianne Weist on that cover

  2. Kebbie says:

    She uses a lot of words to say nothing. Is it me or is she not really giving any substantive answers? I feel like I kind of get where she’s going with something and then I just lose the thread.

    • pantanlones en fuego says:

      Yes! I was just coming to say that she strikes me as the sort of person who says more than is necessary to try to sound smarter than she is.

    • Oy vey says:

      I feel the same way. Gobbledeegook. Word salad. Bad deflection. Is she saying that she did do the hotel room massage, but just didn’t think it was a big deal?

    • paranormalgirl says:

      The was all just a textbook example of circular speaking.

  3. Astrid says:

    that is one weird magazine cover! Am i missing something?

    • Kebbie says:

      She looks like she’s purposely squinting her eyes to combat the plastic surgery stuff

      • lucy2 says:

        OK good, glad I’m not alone in that thinking!

        I don’t really get her. She clearly had something done, why not just say “yeah, my eyelids were impairing my vision, got it taken care of, move on!” No one would have cared beyond that.
        And I really don’t understand what she’s saying about Weinstein.

  4. Kate says:

    Yeah her reasons for not being a victim seem a bit scattered. Maybe she means she thinks she knew how to avoid getting in a one-on-one situation with any would-be predator and as to verbal harassment she mostly just had playful banter and it never felt inappropriate? Granted many women couldn’t avoid a one-on-one situation when they were tricked into coming to “a party” or Harvey was banging down their hotel door, but ok.

    • Kebbie says:

      And a lot of them thought they were avoiding a one-on-one situation because his female assistants were there at first then suddenly left.

    • Turtledove says:

      ” Maybe she means she thinks she knew how to avoid getting in a one-on-one situation with any would-be predator”

      That is how I took it too, and it’s shitty. It implies that the victims are to blame for NOT avoiding those situations. In the meantime, those “situations” were presented as meetings, with female assistants present, to discuss roles with one of, if not THE most influential man in Hollywood.

  5. Why? says:

    I would like more insider info and gossip on Georgina Chapman. Apparently she’s sleeping/seeing with Adrien Brody now. Seems like unattractive douche bags are what she’s into.

    • minx says:

      OMG she is so gorgeous. I still don’t know how she was able to breed with Harvey Weinstein. There’s no amount of money in the world….

  6. Mia4s says:

    I’m going to be VERY generous and say that maybe she means whatever bullying or inappropriate comments she received, she took as a joke. That’s a fairly common defence mechanism. Sort of a: “I couldn’t be harassed! I was in the club! I got the joke!” Thing. Again, I may be waaay too generous here.

    She’s clearly embarrassed by the association. Honestly? Too bad. I don’t care. That monster’s actions were his own but all of Hollywood should be embarrassed by the association. Since shame doesn’t seem to work, maybe embarrassment will force change.

    • tealily says:

      There is a guy in my sphere who has a tendency to make comments about my appearance, generalizations about women, etc. I don’t work with him, but he is someone I have to deal with on a regular basis. I do my best to avoid him, and laugh it off/ cut the conversation short when he says something because I honestly don’t feel like I have another course of action. I need to deal with this man and stay on a friendly basis for the time being. Her comments make me feel like maybe she was in the same situation.

      If the guy hasn’t done anything overt, what are you supposed to do? There are no good options here. The options are laugh it off or blow up some important aspect of your life, and that’s just a calculation everyone has to make for themselves.

    • stormsmama says:

      it seems to me like she was so singularly focused on the work AS AN ACTOR- while simulaneneously shy and embarrassed as a small insignificant person- that she assumed if he said anything that she was “in” the club but he was obviously “joking” bc she was not “acceptable” in that she was insecure about herself and couldn’t imagine being desired
      Thats how Im reading this…
      but she has waited this long to speak she should’ve put real thought into how to articulate her experience- knowing she would be asked about it

    • veroS says:

      I took it to mean that she’s questioning her interactions with him. She has a tendency to sort of ramble on in the interview. I think she is saying she used to brush off any comments she got in her career as just joking, or just the way the industry was, and didn’t feel bad about it, but now that the revelations have come out, she’s reevaluating what her work relationship with him was really like, and if she was missing something because she didn’t think of him as threatening, so she didn’t know what a threat he actually was.

  7. Becks1 says:

    Her comments about Harvey are weird. It sounds like she’s saying she was never accosted because she would know how to handle it, which is….off, because I’m sure lots of his victims would have said that as well. Everyone thinks they know how they would handle it.

    • pantanlones en fuego says:

      I got that too and while I think I understand what she is trying to say, she is dangerously close to victim blaming.

  8. Lowrider says:

    Renee and Jennifer Lawrence seem to have similar tactics in which they handle inappropriate attention from male producers. Turn it into a joke or see it as banter.

    • lucy2 says:

      They aren’t alone in that. A lot of women feel if they’re “in on the joke” they’re safe.

      • stormsmama says:

        right. If you can awkwardly laugh it off or pretend you’re more like the sister than the sexual target, you are protected and in some way that makes you smarter or whatever…
        In my experience that is self preservation at its best and I don’t fault them. It can be scary to speak up if your job (and in Harveys case your future employment and reputationn) is at stake

  9. DS9 says:

    I took her comments to mean that she didn’t feel as if he behaved inappropriately with her bit that she wonders if there wasn’t something more to the jokes and atmosphere surrounding her, surrounding him than she recognized.

    I noticed that despite the word salad of her response though that she does not imply in any way, shape, or form that he didn’t or wasn’t capable of what he’s been accused of and I appreciate that about her.

    I would imagine it’s something like finding out your cousin was abused by a mutual uncle you’ve all spent time with and wondering what you missed.

    It does go to the nature of abuse, doesn’t it? Renee and Salma are clearly close or were. The shame these men force on their victims…

    • Ali says:

      Agree.

      Abusers don’t abuse everyone who knows them which is why victims can find it so hard to be believed.

      My third grade math teacher was a guy who was accused the following year of molesting a girl student. I’m not lying when I say nothing inappropriate happened to me, and I remember liking him as a teacher. He was fired and and there’s no reason to not believe the girl who said he did abuse her.

    • veroS says:

      That’s what I took from it as well.

  10. JIlly says:

    What ever happened to the last boyfriend Doyle Brammhal? It seems weird that no one asks about him and they were together for years.

    • FutureCatLady says:

      I can tell you exactly what happened to that relationship. And I know this a person who is very close to me and who knows Doyle personally. Doyle took on a 17 year old musician as a protege and then started a relationship with her. At one point, her mother walked in on them making out and his only response was, “hey Mom!” About a year ago, the protege posted a topless picture of herself holding her breasts to show off her Doyle tattoo under her breast. And most recently, she now has a baby. I’m not saying that the Doyle is the father but I’m not saying that Doyle is not the father. But I do not know the status of his relationship with Renee. Perhaps they had an open relationship since he’s always on the road?

  11. otaku fairy.... says:

    She’s got a point about how plastic surgery is handled. To me it’s not wrong just to speculate on the internet about whether or not someone famous had work done (other people may feel differently, which is fine too). The problem is when that becomes yet another way of positioning some women as intellectually/ morally superior, more progressive, or otherwise inherently superior people based on what they haven’t done with their bodies, or that reductive thing where a woman’s entire sense of self-worth is only judged based on whether or not she likes and accepts every single thing about her physical appearance. Another problem is when people have to constantly bring up work that’s been done no matter what certain women are doing or use it to derail important conversations about other topics, as if that one act makes anything women have to say invalid. Plus gender, racial and cis/trans divides on who gets to ‘get away with ‘ certain procedures vs. who gets to be seen as a traitor who has to stfu about all issues facing their group(s) because of it.

    Salma Hayek’s rose analogy was good too.

    • Bella Bella says:

      I wonder if guys with obvious plastic surgery ever get asked about it in interviews. Like Rupert whats-his-face, who kind of killed his career he looked so different.

  12. Mabs A'Mabbin says:

    What a bunch of incoherent word salad bull shit. Blagh. Give her a vanilla wafer, and escort the brain damage home.

  13. sue denim says:

    I think maybe what she meant about Weinstein is what a lot of us have gone through since metoo, re-evaluating past interactions, personal and professional, the low level gaslighting that oh it’s all in good fun..like Uma Thurman thinking QT was such a great pal, even after he tried to kill her w a bad car, also not trusting her talent as an actress to…erm…act… From my own pov, I used to see Harvey Weinstein at film events and knew how positively brutal and ruthless he was in dealing w producers, directors, etc, but yet I believed the stories about women in his orbit, that all of that was somehow consensual. Why did I think so little of other women to believe that? Why did I not see that he could be as ruthless in other contexts as he was in deals. He was such a disgusting human, hiding in plain site. The whole toxic message of the “casting couch”? And enough about Renee’s face (not to all of us here, but to journalists and even Renee), she’s so incredibly talented, let’s focus on that, it’s her face, hers to do w what she wants, and hope she can own that too…

  14. Clay says:

    what she says about “not knowing” if the (bad) behaviour was such is so sad but also so true to many women of her and mine generation and older: that kind of abuse was so normalized in society that only NOW we start looking back and acknowledge it as such: abuse. For many of us it was just “boys will be boys”: A lot of this is sadly the result also from a very misogynist older generation of women raising their daughters to get used to be abused and their sons to not even realizing they were abusers. And hopefully the newer generations fo women know better, now the true challenge is that the younger men get the memo as well, because their fathers are still clueless

  15. Bella Bella says:

    I’ve only been in the theater world (versus tv or movies) and there is a LOT of sexual teasing that goes on. At first I was so taken aback I just would blush and be quiet. But I had to learn how to sass back. I’m thinking that’s what she is talking about in terms of the joking. It’s constant. It’s part of the world. You play back. Now, maybe that kind of behavior isn’t acceptable, I have no idea. And certainly when it crosses the line to harassment or rape that’s awful. To me it sounded like she was lucky that Weinstein never crossed that line with her.

    As for the plastic surgery, I’ve always felt that Renee *stopped* having work done and that’s why her face changed. That before, she was pumped up with botox and fillers and crap, and when she took off time she stopped with all that. But who knows. The one thing I’ve noticed is that her hairline seems higher.

  16. xo says:

    Re: the kerfuffle around her plastic surgery

    Perhaps she was as surprised as everyone else by the outcome of her surgery. Methinks she thought it would look . . . . less obvious.
    The public reaction probably put salt in the wound.