New York State to ban fish pedicures for heath reasons

Fish Pedicures

People will do insane things in the name of beauty. Have you read about the Brazilian keratin treatment? It involves straightening the hair using formaldehyde. Yep, the same thing that’s used to preserve bodies and whatnot. You have to wear a “military-grade rubber gas mask” due to the fumes, and even then there’s a distinct possibility of eventual death as the toxins build up in your system. Given that, it doesn’t seem that crazy to let little fish have a go at the dead skill cells on your feet. Disgusting as heck, yes. But probably less likely to kill you, and you can leave your gas mask at home. But New York lawmakers disagree (they’re also working on that hair straightening, so you better stock up on Mexican formaldehyde while you can), and they’re trying to get the little fishies banned from the state. Or at least make sure you can’t put your feet on them.

Ban or no ban, the fish-pedicure business could be circling the drain in New York state.

Secretary of State Lorraine Cortes-Vazquez said yesterday she believes existing regulations give her office authority to flush the potentially unsanitary beauty procedure — in which live carp are used to suck dead skin off a customer’s feet — regardless of whether a proposed ban becomes law.

Cortes-Vazquez, whose office oversees more than 8,300 beauty salons, said she’ll pitch a prohibition on fish pedicures later this month at a meeting of the state’s cosmetology advisory board.

“If necessary, we will also seek some legislative remedy,” she said.

“But we believe we can do it from a health and safety standpoint through our existing regulatory process.”

[From the New York Post]

I saw this story on the local news last night, and thought, what the heck, I’ll give it a go. My roommate has this gnarly fishbowl that rivals the East River in terms of murky, questionable water. So I stuck my feet in there and waited for her New York State Fair carnival prize goldfish to go at it. Two hours later and nothing, though my feet felt sort of slimy. I can’t blame New York lawmakers for wanting to ban the practice. What a rip off! I wasted all that time, I can’t imagine how I’d feel if I wasted money, too.

Okay so I didn’t actually drag the roomie’s fishbowl into my room, but I don’t think that would be any weirder than going into a salon and asking to let some carp munch on my feet. JayBird’s Rule of Life Number One: You eat fish. Fish do not eat you. And frankly, I think the salons are violating some kind of labor laws. Are the carp being compensated? And if this is a pedicure, how do the fish paint the toenails underwater? I assume they’ve got some special kind of nail polish, but I don’t care what you say, even the most dexterous fish is going to struggle holding the brush. And there’s no way you’re getting designs or a complicated French manicure. I seriously doubt there are any safety issues. But I bet there are a lot of dissatisfied customers out there.

Next up: basset hound massages. They drag their ears across your back in long, soothing strokes, similar to the theory behind Swedish massage.

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

35 Responses to “New York State to ban fish pedicures for heath reasons”

Comments are Closed

We close comments on older posts to fight comment spam.

  1. Annie says:

    Gross.

  2. TwinkleToes says:

    This was a great article. You didn’t really do the goldfish thing, did you? We’ve got to do lunch sometime. I know a great Korean hibachi place just a hop, skip and a jump from Penn Station.

  3. TwinkleToes says:

    Wow, look what happened to Karen Walker on the left there!

  4. BitterBetty says:

    Okay thats disgusting. feet and fish do not make a good combo.

  5. Firestarter says:

    Where have I been that I have NEVER heard of this?

  6. barneslr says:

    I actually heard about this some years ago on some documentary. There are some lakes in Europe (I think it was Europe, anyway) where psoriasis sufferers would go for fish “treatments.” The fish would essentially eat the sores/scabs and it gave a great deal of relief to the sufferers.

    Some people swore by it and claimed that it not only healed the sores that they currently had, but it also seemed to prevent them from recurrences for great periods of time. I wondered then if it were something that was going to be studied by the legitimate medical community. It never occurred to me that it might devolve into a pedi treatment.

  7. buellblaster says:

    Now I know why I found a painted toenail in my Mrs. Paul’s fish sticks!

  8. princess pea says:

    You know, so long as I don’t have to eat the fish afterwards, it’s not that terrible sounding to me. I probably wouldn’t do it, but then again I only get my hair cut by a pro every two years or so. I’m not the best example of salon-user, I guess.

  9. Toe says:

    I dont mind donating some dead skin to some hungry fishies.

  10. Rae says:

    Haven’t Asian women been doing this for forever? It’s definitely not the first time I’ve heard of it. In fact, in an episode of Ugly Betty, Wilhemina did some kind of fish foot treatment because Bradford Meade had a foot fetish.

    In some part of the world (can’t remember where), they also use maggots because maggots feed off dead/decaying cells, so they eat off the calluses and stuff.

  11. BitterBetty says:

    The close up headline picture on the main page is literally making me sick.

  12. michellllle says:

    I don’t get what the risks would be. It doesn’t seem anymore unsanitary than any of the other mani/pedi treatments like the parafin wax or more typically having some so-called nail professional personally grooming you w/ long questionably clean nails. So long as the water is clean & regularly changed I imagine acetone, nail polishes/chemicals & glues as well as potentially inept people cutting at your cuticles is by far riskier & much more gross than a bunch of little fish nibbling at your toes. Those who are so freaked out are probably the same type who wear shoes in the sea or refuse to even go in.

  13. crash2GO2 says:

    Hey, it seems like the perfect example of a nice symbiotic relationship to me. We have dead skin we want to get rid of, and the fish want to eat it without hurting us one bit. Where is the problem?

    I hadn’t heard about the lakes in Europe and the psoriasis sufferers – that is very interesting. I’m off to do some research. One of the companies I used to work for targets psoriasis in their research, so I’m somewhat familiar with it.

  14. Persistent Cat says:

    I saw that fish thing when I was in Tokyo last year. As for the Brazilian straightening thing, I had never heard of that but now the tiny signs in salons that I saw last week while in NYC make sense. I’ll do a lot of stupid things for vanity but I think I’ll just stick to the 50 minutes of blow-drying and using a straightener.

  15. irishserra says:

    I have to agree with Toe, Rae and Michellle. I’m not sure what the big deal is, but then I would never smear any chemical laden solutions on my body, such as makeup or hair coloring or even lotions. The common “beauty” regimes used by the general population is much more dangerous than anything those fish can do.

  16. omondieu says:

    JayBird’s Rule of Life Number One: You eat fish. Fish do not eat you.

    Well, except for great white sharks.

  17. Eileen Yover says:

    The hair treatment with formaldehyde: how scary is it that they use formaldehyde in flu shots? You have to wear gas masks to put it on your hair, but hey lets inject it into our veins!

    The fish pedi wouldn’t bother me-I get that from my friends cat. He has a MAJOR foot fetish and will just sit there and lick your foot for hours. If you get up he follows you. Your feet look great when he’s done!! =)

  18. Allie says:

    I’ve never heard of this, but it’s pretty gross. I can’t imagine why you’d even want to try this.

  19. Green Is Good says:

    As long as the water is changed and the tank is cleaned after each client’s treatment, there wouldn’t be a problem.

  20. Kolby says:

    Meh, I checked and the bill was just introduced in the State Senate and doesn’t even have an Assembly companion. Legislation has to be introduced in, and then pass, both houses to become a law. It takes a long time in most cases. The little toe-nibblers are safe for a while, I’d say.

  21. GatsbyGal says:

    It sounds like it would feel awesome, but there’s just no way to make sure that every salon that offers this procedure is cleaning the tanks properly and changing the water after each customer (and as anyone who’s ever owned a fishtank can tell you, that would be a hassle…scooping out each fish, pouring out the water, putting in new water, and then adding the fish back in little plastic baggies full of water to make sure they adjust if there’s any temperature difference so they don’t die).

    It would be like playing foot fungus roulette. Did someone with an infected ingrown toenail use this tank before me? Did these people really take out all the fish and put new water in? Plus, y’know…these fish are gonna poop in these tanks. So you’re putting your feet in fishpoop water that may or may not also contain the murky funk of whatever lady came in before you.

    I’M GLAD THEY’RE BANNING THIS!

  22. Prissa says:

    That has got to tickle like a sumb!tch

  23. Bete says:

    It’s so amazing…not the fish, the laziness. Women are so goddamn lazy, they can’t be bothered trimming their toenails or grooming them. I find that more disturbing than the fish pedicure.

  24. snowball says:

    Ugh, that is so NOT sanitary. There’s really no way they clean the tanks after every single munching. So what happens if the person ahead of you has a bleeding sore or a cut or something and the fish open it up and the water gets blood in it?

    God, the abundance of toe cheese that must be in that murky slop. shudder

  25. GatsbyGal says:

    Bete, I agree. My ped-egg costs 10 bucks and does more than these fishes ever could.

  26. NIKKI says:

    And frankly, I think the salons are violating some kind of labor laws. Are the carp being compensated?

    ______________

    hahahah. i laughed out loud at this! nice one!

  27. Sarah says:

    Sorry to interrupt the discussion, but the headline is misspelled. Typing errors are one of my pet peeves.

  28. Lisa says:

    This is old school. O.o

  29. la chica says:

    they’re gonna go underground. black market fish pedicures. lol.

  30. ruru says:

    man, i wanted to try this before i moved home from japan, but i kept forgetting. I can understand the sanitary issues of sticking your feet in a tank where other feet have been previously, but the public baths in my town had a ‘stream’ with fish instead.

  31. Diwali6 says:

    Excuse me while I barf!

  32. Howie says:

    People spray formaldehyde all over themselves when they wear perfume – on the body’s largest organ. If you don’t want it squirted into your arm, don’t squirt it on your wrists, either!

  33. isabelle says:

    Sick.

  34. Jazz says:

    Those poor fishies! Still, they look happy!

  35. Shadow says:

    I have never tried it, but seriously, what is the problem here. Sharks have fish that swim around and clean them, is it really that disgusting?

    These fish apparently are toothless, so they do not actually bite you, they live in hot springs so the water you are putting your feet into is very warm, mostly the salons I saw have a sort of stream or river where you put your foot in, so there is very little chance of getting cross contamination from others, also since the fish are stripping away bacteria with the dead skin, the overall cleanliness is improved.

    There are probably a number of reason this is better than someone using sharp implements on your feet, but mostly for me, I like the idea that we as the human race are rejoining nature.

    We have technology and have used it extensively for a long time, and technology is good, do not mis-understand me, but I think we are over using it, partly because companies want us to buy their products, partly our own faults, it is just that we should start looking for natural ways to do things. Not sure if I am explaining myself correctly, I just think we let our dependence on technology go a bit far, and I think we should start to swing it back a bit and use natural processes a bit more, not to dispose of technology, but back up a little from our use of technology. So using fish to clean our feet and reduce the number of razors etc used to scrape the feet, I am all for that.