Lizzie Cundy thinks Prince Harry & Meghan’s charity work is a ‘publicity stunt’

The Duchess of Sussex’s brief time in the UK broke a lot of brains over there. I’m still shocked by just how many men and women can’t seem to get over the fact that Meghan gave that country a shot, then she took her man and her child and dipped. This is a story about one of those broken-brain people. So, there are too many British C-listers or D-listers who I simply couldn’t pick out of a line-up. I’m sure I’ve heard the name “Lizzie Cundy” before now, but I don’t think I’ve ever seen a photo of her before this post. Holy sh-t, you guys. Talk about botched plastic surgery, fish-lipped hatchet-faces. Well, Lizzie Cundy is desperate for attention and she heard that there’s a billion-dollar industry in hating Meghan. This bitch wants a piece of that action.

Lizzie Cundy has hit out at ex-pal Meghan Markle following her explosive Netflix series with her husband Prince Harry. The TV personality, 54, has previously said she became friends with the Duchess of Sussex after the pair bonded at a charity dinner together in 2013.

Speaking exclusively to Daily Star at a dog fur-iendly event at Romeo and Juliet’s café last week, she said: “Look I’m gonna be honest with Meghan and Harry. Obviously, I knew Meghan before she got with Harry. I just think it’s great they’re doing their charity work, but I just think it’s a bit of a shame to have to do it with the camera crew there.”

She went on to brand their documentary series a “publicity stunt” and begged the couple to do some good deeds without sharing their good work with the public. Lizzie went on: “Why are they doing it? And I just think maybe do some good stuff without the cameras there for a pat on the back. They haven’t been seen together for a long time and I just think this is – shall I say – a publicity stunt, possibly?”

The broadcaster passed on some of the pearls of wisdom she received from her close friend and music mogul Simon Cowell. The TV star pointed out: “I think people know real things. Simon Cowell always says to me, ‘Be real because the audience can see through it’. And I just think now people have seen through Meghan.”

[From The Daily Star]

Again, Meghan and Harry don’t have social media nor are they regularly showing up at charity events with cameras. My problem with M&H is that they SHOULD document their charity work more, they should have a newsletter and they should have an Archewell Instagram set up to highlight the local, state, national and international work they’re doing. Obviously, Lizzie Cundy is just auditioning for a talk-show gig or an appearance on Dan Wootton’s show.

Also: as I was trying to figure out who the f–k this woman is, I found this other interview she gave a few weeks ago, where she was once again trashing her “former friend” Meghan.

“I don‘t want to see any couples split up when any marriage falls apart. It’s sad, especially when you have children. (But) we could all see the writing was on the wall, it‘s very different when you’re a celebrity princess than being a royal princess and frankly Meghan just wasn’t up for the job.” The 55-year-old socialite went on to explain Meghan wasn’t much of a fit for “doing all the roles that royals do”, like opening hospitals for example.

“It’s not easy, it’s not glamorous, it’s not like on the red carpet,” she said. “I think Meghan thought she was going to be the top dog star of the show and Princess Kate was always going to have that role.” In Cundy’s opinion, a potential divorce would be “in some respects better for Harry”, with the TV personality urging the world to look at the relationship from his perspective. “We‘ve got to look at it from Harry’s side. He’s in California now, he’s got none of his friends. He’s got no family, he’s got a rift with his father and his brother, it must be very lonely at times,” she concluded.

[From News.com.au]

The absolute audacity of this woman. Imagine arguing (simultaneously) that Meghan wanted to be top-dog at drudge royal work, and only Kate can do that (except Kate doesn’t do that or any work at all). All of the projection about the Sussex marriage too… I’m constantly disgusted by the sense of ownership people still have on H&M.

Photos courtesy of Avalon Red.

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

116 Responses to “Lizzie Cundy thinks Prince Harry & Meghan’s charity work is a ‘publicity stunt’”

Comments are Closed

We close comments on older posts to fight comment spam.

  1. Kokiri says:

    Gosh, replace the “d” with a “t” huh?

    And those eyebrows! What the actual hell.

    • Elizabeth Regina says:

      I know this woman and I can confidently tell you that she was never Meghan’s friend. Her claim to fame is being dumped by her mildly successful footballer ex who hates her very existence. If you think she looks bad in photos you need to see her in real life. She’s flashed her private parts and pulled every stunt to remain relevant and Meghan bashing gets her the most attention. Just another insignificant and hateful Karen envious of Meghan’s life and she aint seen nothing yet.

    • theRobinsons says:

      Her face job is a bad publicity stunt!!!

    • Feeshalori says:

      Another rando crawling out of the woodwork. Even her shiny eyebrows look plastic.

    • Beverley says:

      Oh man @Kokiri, you beat me to it. 😁

    • Giddy says:

      She’s still upset because someone dropped a house on her.😂

    • spudlykate says:

      Guys I googled this woman just to see what she looked like before all THIS *gestures wildly at her face* happened and I came across an article that quoted her when Lilibet was born where she claimed that Meghan named Lili after HERRRRR and that Lilibet was her childhood nickname that no one called her in years. READER, HOW I LAUGHED. Sure Cundy, Meghan named her daughter after a person she met once who she probably had no idea used to be called Lilibet (if that’s even true), and not her HUSBAND’S LITERAL GRANDMOTHER whose WELL DOCUMENTED family nickname it was. She even suggested that Meghan naming Lilibet after her was perhaps a way of Meghan reaching back out to her LOL. Absolutely delusional.

      • Agreatreckoning says:

        Yeah, Cundy has claimed lots of things. Like, she was asked to befriend Meghan at party because Meghan didn’t know “anyone”. Meghan was quite familiar with people due to her Soho connections and otherwise. At best, Meghan was kind and friendly to Lizzie, a reality tv show person. Meghan was already on the successful cable show Suits. Lizzie was actually attractive way back when. Now, Jocelyn Wildenstein just wants her face back from Lizzie.

  2. Anne says:

    I just turned 40 and have been considering popping into a plastic surgeon’s office… after seeing these photos I’ve changed my mind. Thanks, Lizzie!

    • bubblegum Dreams says:

      I don’t blame you for backing up. Yikes. It’s like she has the Phantom of the Opera’s mask implanted under her skin

      • kirk says:

        bubblegum – this post has been a real gift with so many! hilarious takes, but I think yours absolutely takes the cake! Kudos.

    • Over it says:

      I don’t know this enigma, but it’s sure trying hard to get attention.

  3. ThatsNotOkay says:

    Yikes. No.

    And if she were Meghan’s friend, she’d be able to speak to her in private—no need to crow to tabloids. So…friend she is not and likely never was. And her opinion is worth less than the nose she left on the surgeon’s floor.

  4. L84Tea says:

    Who??

  5. CheChe says:

    Why is she still talking? Without the Sussex connection thirst …” Harpo, who dis woman?”

  6. Slush says:

    As someone who has said here multiple times that they should tell us more about what they’re doing, I completely disagree.

    Damned if they do, damned if they don’t.

  7. Mary Pester says:

    😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣A washed up plastic reality woman (NOT STAR) tries to tell Harry and Megan what to do 😂😂😂😂, and cameras!??? So she does watch invictus, polo matches (maybe) but lizzy drip if cameras at events are so bad, why are they always their for the Royals and why are you always looking for them.? Now couple of points, this plastic melting barbie works for GB news (same as Wooton!?) and PLEASE, PLEASE contact Kate Lizzy dripping, because maybe she can give you the name of her plastic chap because by God you need an intervention!! STAY AWAY FROM CANDLE’S OR DIRECT Sunlight, and she met Megan 3 times, so no, not a friend

  8. Robert says:

    Her face, what a jumpscare!

    • Minnieder says:

      🤣 a jumpscare indeed!’

    • Josephine says:

      I am saying this with all seriousness – she should sue her plastic surgeon. That nose is painful to look at and I can’t imagine she can breath through it. Maybe all that mouth breathing has left her without enough oxygen to think about what she’s saying.

  9. MsIam says:

    Ok so if Meghan and Harry should do good things and not tell anybody then how would we know about it? By this insane reasoning, how do we know they aren’t doing those good things already? Because they aren’t supposed to tell anyone. Do we need to hear from every has-been fame whore out here now?

    • BeanieBean says:

      Oh, the irony–complaining about H&M having cameras at a charity event…while at a charity event with cameras & reporters.

  10. Another d lister trying to gain some relevance by talking trash about someone the British tabloids insist is irrelevant. Go figure.

  11. Amy Bee says:

    With Lizzie Cundy’s logic, William and Kate shouldn’t be going to royal engagements with cameras and press in tow. She’s another person who believed that just because she met Meghan in the UK that she was going to be invited to the wedding and when she wasn’t started bashing her.

    • Lorelei says:

      @Amy Bee, what’s so funny is that the ROTA will breathlessly report on her comments, thrilled to finally have some more anti-M content, not realizing that they’d be out of jobs if the BRF took her advice.

    • EllenOlenska says:

      Oh but it’s just that secretly W&K do SO MUCH charitable work in private…so very U!

      Like trimming rosebushes at the neighbors…

      • Sugarhere says:

        I concur. William and Kate are not lazy. They’re undercover charitable agents operating discreetly so that their hard-working philanthropic cover won’t be blown up.

  12. Dee says:

    Who is this person?

  13. A says:

    How old is she? She was 55 in that second quoted article and 54 in the first. Maybe she’s found the Fountain of Youth and there are side effects. Like being an attention-seeking b

  14. TheWigletOfWails says:

    When people say Meghan wanted to be the top dog, what exactly do they mean by that? Like give specific examples of when she tried to do that.

    The Sussexes charity work is a publicity stunt? Ok, do the BaRF’s, quickly. At least Harry and Meghan have tangible results to show. What do the royals have?

    Everyday, another swipe at the Sussex marriage. There are little children involved FFS. Y’all go on about the sanctity of marriage but want this couple to split for nefarious reasons. It’s so sick and I’m tired of it all.

    • Lorelei says:

      Yeah, IIRC, it was KATE who we saw always trying to push her way to the front and center of the balcony and purposely wearing things that would make her stand out at inappropriate times. Not Meghan.

      • Nerd says:

        Yes, a white or cream dress at another woman’s wedding. Red shoes and fascinator at a child’s christening where everyone else is wear light colors that match. Red to every Commonwealth service making her standout from everyone else. Green on a balcony where everyone else is wearing the same color red at the first conAnation. Electric blue at the second conAnation where everyone is wearing a navy or black color.

      • Janice Hill says:

        Yes, and when the rule was no tiaras at the coronation, Kate wore…a tiara!

  15. Becks1 says:

    Who is this woman???

    As for her comments….H&M publicize some of their charity work because they are highlighting an area of need or a specific charity. and they don’t bring a camera crew with them, the most we usually get is a social media post from the charity itself, or papped pictures (thinking of Meghan hosting that lunch in LA in the spring.)

    LOL to the idea that Meghan wasn’t up to the onerous task of opening hospital wings.

    • Lorelei says:

      She’s probably one of the people who still believes that Meghan brought her own camera crew to Uvalde despite all evidence to the contrary. Unhinged

    • JudyB says:

      Exactly what skill or talent is required to open a hospital?

      Also, who would really go to Simon Cowell for advice??

  16. Athena says:

    In the absence of them being seen and heard from what people are going to remember is what others are saying. So yes, Archwell should be on social media, just turn off the comments. The more Meghan is seeing, looking like a normal person going about her business the less sway those story painting her as some horrible human being will have. The more people see Harry going about living his life, the less likely they’ll believe the stories that he’s miserable and missing his abusive family.

    That family has yet to deny that they financially and physically abused Harry and yet people like this woman think he should go back to them.

    People use the word friend so loosely. Meeting someone a few times and even hanging out a few times does not necessarily make you friends

    • Lorelei says:

      Yeah, it says they met once at an event. Did they even stay in touch after that night? Were they ever seen together ever again? These people are pathetic.

      • Christine says:

        They sat next to each other at a charity event in 2013, and this bitch thinks she had one half of a BFF heart necklace from Meghan? She’s Piers Morgan’s soul mate.

      • Sugarhere says:

        @Christine, 😂 Savage!

  17. Barbara says:

    Did I interpret her comment about them not being seen together recently correctly? So following that logic, since we haven’t seen Lili lately, they gave her away? The last time this chick went to her butcher, some of her brains leaked out through her plastic nose.

  18. Miranda says:

    Do the Brits not have good plastic surgeons, or are the people getting the surgery too cheap to pay for competence? Because the lowliest Real Housewife of Podunk Hollow often seems to have better work than British women who you’d think could afford better.

    Also, I get that there’s a certain grind to attending openings and meeting people as often as some working royals do, but it’s hardly manual labor, you know? Can we stop pretending it’s some great effort that only people with magical royal blood can handle?

    • Lorelei says:

      “Real Housewife of Podunk Hollow” 😭

      I needed to laugh so badly today and I came to the right place

  19. Sugarhere says:

    And I think Lizzie Cundy’s face alone is a publicity stunt to exhort people to find alternatives to aggressive plastic surgery.
    Girl, bye!

    • Lorelei says:

      @sugarhere lmfaooo. The comments are hysterical today. I was busy looking at her horrific clothing. WTF is that pink fur ensemble?

      • Sugarhere says:

        @Lorelei, 😁 Perhaps the pink fur ensemble is her way of traveling back to the remote spaces of youthfulness? Ain’t fooling me. It looks like reasonabley well-preserved Egyptian Mummy bandage, with a little bit of fluff.

      • Bee says:

        WTF that outfit is, is the least of her issues.

  20. Nerd says:

    I’m at the point that if I didn’t know of you prior to Harry and Meghan’s relationship, your opinion is just as relevant now as it was back in 2015. I’m not sure if there is a different name for a Karen who has a nose of a ten year old child but she’s definitely one of them. As they basically said in their documentary, If the cameras are going to continue to be on them, then they will make sure that their work and the causes that matter to them gets the attention it deserves. So if the media, haters and trolls are going to continue making them the main topic, expect that their work will continue to be the main topic. To which I say, bless them for using the noise and making the best of the situation, by focusing on worthy causes. Shine a light on them, expect to shine a light on their causes.

  21. Grant says:

    Chr!st on a Cracker, don’t stand too close to an open flame, lady!!!

    • The Hench says:

      I think your advice comes too late. Looks like she already did….

      • Grant says:

        Lol — you’re right. She makes Khloe Kardashian and her new face look like a natural beauty (which Khloe was pre-face transplant, IMO)!

  22. Debbie says:

    Okay, is it my turn to say it? What’s a Lizzie Cundy?

  23. Tessa says:

    Another faux friend who crave s attention.

  24. BizzatchExtrordinaire says:

    She’s telling other people to be “real”? With THAT face???

  25. Tarte au Citron says:

    Oh Lizzie can sit the eff down. She is only known for being married to a footballer. I couldn’t even tell who what he looks like or who he played for, but Lizzie loved being a football WAG and milked it. I am sure she was in some crappy reality shows too. I have not seen her in a while, so yikes at that surgery. She looks like an oligarch’s 1st divorced wife.

  26. JCallas says:

    These woman can’t stand that a black American divorcée married into royalty. That’s why they’ve desperately clamoring for a divorce.

    • Lorelei says:

      Yeah, I think that many of them are delusional enough to think that they actually have a chance if Harry’s back on the market. As if

  27. aquarius64 says:

    This harassment of Meghan is exhausting but it identifies the Karens and Kens. These women are mad the Princess Diaries/Hallmark movie fantasy is shattered and these women are delusional to think they would have faired better.

    • Lorelei says:

      @Aquarius, you’re exactly right. It really is an excellent barometer.

      Another way to easily identify people to avoid is seeing who insists on calling Kate “Catherine.” It ALWAYS means that person blindly worships her and despises M…and usually they’re raging racists.

      • aquarius64 says:

        These women also don’t understand that royal life comes with tolerating disrespect from your royal spouse, and that includes a side chick. Although she would have just cause to leave she better not reveal him as the reincarnation of Henry VIII if she knows what’s good for her.

    • Jais says:

      Yeah, Meghan not being up to the job of being a princess is not the dog they think it. What they really mean is she had some self-respect bc the Windsor idea of a princess is a joke.

  28. Jeanette says:

    It’s amazing to me that with all the advances in science they still have gotten beyond the plastic hatchet race, slap fish lip look in cosmetic surgery.

  29. Kingston says:

    Never forget: every brit who tells us, in various ways, that H&M should hide themselves in California and not be seen or heard from anymore, do so because when H&M are seen and/or heard from, they make everyone on Shidthole Isle, including the lazy, good-for-nothing scammers in the royal mafia gang look bad, pathetic, try-hard, ugly, grifting, worthless……..all the things.

    LMFAO

    • EBS says:

      I really think that people should try very hard not to make guilt by association arguments. This idiot woman does not speak for me or anyone in the UK other than herself. (I have no opinion on Harry and Meghan beyond that I am pleased for them that they are free).

  30. ⁷Tree says:

    The british have taken over entertainment and now there is nowhere left to go. They can’t blame h&m. They was running out if material long before harry decided “enough”. That’s why they are still using megan.

    Cundy is just talking. She has no idea how sussex marriage is going. If a divorce was happening it would’ve happen in England.

  31. C says:

    …I think if I saw this woman pronouncing against Meghan in public I would just smile and nod and run for my life.

    • Sugarhere says:

      Same! Have you ever seen that movie starring Leonardo di Caprio, The Man in the Iron Mask? What was back then a historical injustice might come in handy here.

  32. Hail says:

    Ah yes, the woman who claimed to have introduced Harry and Meghan even though we know that that’s an outright lie still lying about her “friendship” with a woman she met once!

  33. Chaine says:

    Who – da – WHO??? based on this nonentity’s comments, I suspect everyone is misspelling her surname by one letter…

  34. QuiteContrary says:

    I’m guessing that — like most of us — Meghan could not pick this woman out of a police lineup.

  35. Kingston says:

    Theyve been gagging for a H&M divorce since it became obvious that the marriage would happen.

    Read R.S. Locke’s article on this which she wrote in Feb 2021:
    “Will the House of Windsor Turn into a House of Cards?”
    What happens to British society when the class structure that underpins it is challenged?
    tinyurl[DOT]com/52v5uv3m

  36. Ameerah M says:

    This woman’s whole “career” seems to be a publicity stunt. I still have no idea wtf she is.

  37. Patty says:

    This. Person is 55 ?

  38. L4Frimaire says:

    This lady has been going on for years about Meghan and Harry and they resurrect her every once in a while. Still have no idea who she is or what she does. Can you imagine taking marital advice from this hot mess!? Like who cares what she thinks.

  39. BeanieBean says:

    54, 55? Add ten years & I might believe you.

  40. Twinkles says:

    Her face looks like a mask that would be worn by character from Brandon Cronenberg’s Infinity Pool.

  41. HeatherC says:

    Way way back in the day I was a crowd extra during the filming of “Age of Innocence” when it filmed in Troy. Michelle Pfeiffer said hi to me. That was back in 1992. Obviously we’re besties and I can be counted as a reliable source of information on the Great Ms Pfeiffer. Just saying.

    • Granger says:

      OMG still one of my favourite movies. I’m so jealous! What scene? Did you get to wear a beautiful costume???

  42. Jaded says:

    That face is the stuff of nightmares. You could use her nose as a bottle opener. And what’s with the broadside that “Harry’s got none of his friends…Harry has no family”? Lizzie dear, he has a wife and 2 children he adores. He’s still close with the Spencer side of his family AND Eugenie and her husband Jack who have visited them several times in Montecito. Not to mention the numerous close friends he and Meghan continue to have, some of whom are mega-celebrities in their own right (hello…Oprah, Serena, Steinem, Tyler Perry, I could go on and on). So go back to your Z-list, pose-hard life of going to the opening of an envelope and getting bad plastic surgery.

  43. Libra says:

    Megan’s friends don’t talk .

  44. B says:

    Ewww! Will every botched wannabe starlet start crawling out of the woodwork claiming they know Meghan?? I don’t want to see them! I didn’t want to see this! I was eating lunch!

    Please God I beg let no one else crawl out of their plastic surgeon’s office desperate for relevancy. Kate’s half melting face and wandering eyebrow is the limit of what I can tolerate.

  45. smee says:

    Can’t take anyone with decal eyebrows seriously

  46. AC says:

    I and majority of the world have no idea who this b$&@;tch is. And it’s obvious she wants her 15 secs of fame back 😀

  47. KentBrockman says:

    The part about being a royal is “hard work” made me laugh. They show up in expensive outfits, wave at a crowd and rarely come prepared. How many times have we heard them proudly proclaim that they’re “still learning! Heehee!”
    Then after all that exhausting work they take weeks long vacations, using helicopters and private jets, taking the nanny along to one of their many residences. Please, sign me up for that kind of hard work.

    The hardest part of being a royal is navigating the tabloids and their constant sniping and leaking stories about each other to win that week’s popularity contest, or whatever poll is out.

    AND!! One of the main things that H&M bring to charity work is raising attention and awareness to the organization they are supporting, allowing that org to get more donations from the public. Hello?!

  48. Janice Hill says:

    I don’t know who Lizzy Cundy is, but all that bad plastic surgery sure looks like a publicity stunt.

  49. Roast says:

    I know I’m not supposed to undermine other women…but, DAMN!!!, what’s going on with that face???

  50. Is that so? says:

    I would love this woman to name one philanthropic organization that has a celebrity, with a loyal following, and a stellar reputation working with them, and that organization don’t want the public to know that celebrity’s name.

    Perhaps Lizzie isn’t famous enough, or doesn’t do enough philanthropic work to fully understand the importance of a celebrity’s name to these organizations.

    While the celebrity’s work, and their donations are important, it’s a tail that makes a difference. It’s the people who admire them, and are loyal to them and trust their opinion, and are willing to get involved with the organization because of their endorsement. Once the celebrities have, by their involvement, indicated an institution is a noble cause what they bring to the organization is invaluable.

  51. Lady Digby says:

    Yes it’s hard to believe that Elizabeth Jane Miller was once an attractive young woman. She is now 55.

    A trained actress and broadcaster she can be found on any number of discussion shows airing her extensive ignorance on a wide variety of subjects.

    Having seen her in action I can confirm she is indeed a living example of the aphorism: The emptiest vessel makes the loudest noise.

    That this woman can be described as a friend of Meghan beggars belief. Do not believe a word she says.

  52. satish more says:

    good god. if i were this woman, i’d get myself on the show Botched, STET. also, what a stupid woman. one of the BEST things that the Sussexes do, is give publicity to the charities that theyre involved with. that publicity is worth its weight in gold, and i guarantee that there is not a SINGLE charity was mad about the cameras. ask them what their average donations were, pre and post the Sussexes coming with their cameras.

    what a fool this nightmare-ish looking woman is.

  53. Robin Samuels says:

    Her plastic surgery is a failed publicity stunt. She looks as if she is trying to reimagine herself as Melania Trump.

  54. Likeyoucare says:

    Did she have a photo taken together with meghan.
    If not?
    This is piers morron 2.0 claiming having a relationship with meghan.

  55. jferber says:

    She rivals Jocelyn Wildenstein with the atrocious plastic surgery. She probably ruined her chances of a job in the entertainment field with that unfortunate face and is now jumping on the hate-on-Meghan-and-Harry train, a train led by Harry’s own brother and sister-in-law. Talk about betraying ingrates. Will and Kate are the worst offenders against the Sussexes. Those two are UNFIT to represent England in ANY capacity, much less as future king and queen.

  56. blunt talker says:

    Burnt to a crisp-she told everyone who she is-ypu bother people that don’t bother you or have any effect on your life professionally or personally-go jump in a lake.

  57. DaisyMay says:

    Pinched nose and pork chop cheek implants. That lady’s scary, Mommy. Why do they all want to look the same anyway??

  58. Londongal says:

    I am *screaming* that you’ve done a whole piece on Lizzie Cundy. Guys… she’s not even ‘Z’ list over here. You may as well as the man that runs my local fish and chip shop what he thinks!

  59. Kitten says:

    Salma Hayek is a year older than her O_O