Shakira has been all over the place these week, doing some extraordinary good deeds. Her main focus is education – but it’s not some vague interest or just some celebrity getting a quick press hit. Shakira is focused on the UN Millennium development goals, which have been a moving target for the past decade. Initially, the goals were basically some dreams for how the UN wanted to focus money in the developing world. Over the past decade, they’ve taken on more meaning, and they’ve become at once broader, and more focused. Just one example – someone like Jeffrey Saks began working with the UN development goals program to create UN Millennium Villages, and they’ve become a model of efficiency and self-sustaining localized economies.
Anyway, Shakira’s focus is with the UN Millennium education goals – namely, to ensure that every child in the world has access to primary school education by the year 2015. Shakira penned an interesting essay in The Economist about the subject:
Nine years ago, at the Millennium Summit at the United Nations headquarters in New York, heads of state from around the world agreed on the Millennium Development Goals to reduce global poverty. One of the key goals was to ensure that by 2015 every child, boys and girls alike, would be able to complete primary school. This means that all those finishing primary school in 2015 will be entering school in 2010. It’s a daunting challenge, but if the G8, the G20 and other nations join together to establish a Global Fund for Education, we can make real progress towards this deadline.
Barack Obama promised America’s support for creating this $2 billion new fund just over a year ago. A similar model already exists. The fund will be an independent and innovative institution similar to the Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria. It will include representatives of civil society and developing countries as equal partners alongside donor nations in its governance structure. It will link funding to results—ensuring accountability in the way that funds are spent.
A lot is at stake. In the past two years over 600 schools in Afghanistan have been bombed, burned or shut down by extremists. Eighty percent of these have been schools for girls. Why? Because the education of a child is the most powerful form of national security—and that’s why it is such a threat to militants everywhere.
This isn’t theoretical to me. Growing up in Colombia after decades of conflict I saw that the people who are born poor, die poor. With rare exceptions, they never have the chance to improve their lives.
These people have difficulties finding decent jobs and making a decent life—and they often end up involved in doing things they never imagined. No child dreams of becoming a militant or a drug trafficker. But in developing countries sometimes life doesn’t give you any other option.
Education is the only way to break this cycle. But in today’s world there are still 72m children who are denied the opportunity to go to school and 226m adolescents who don’t attend secondary school.
My foundation in Colombia, Pies Descalzos (“Barefoot”), has proved that the poorest children can be educated. For less than $2 a day per child, our schools provide food, education and counselling services to thousands of students. Our schools help underprivileged children grow in sustainable ways and provide them with the tools they need to break out of the cycle of poverty.
Many people don’t realise that Colombia has one of the largest internally displaced populations in the world. Over 3m people in the country (out of a population of 49m) have fled their homes because of conflict. For this reason we decided that our programmes in Colombia should specifically focus on serving displaced children.
Our work in Colombia combines high-quality academic instruction with recreation, health care and psychological support. We operate six schools in three diverse regions of Colombia: Barranquilla, Quibdó and Altos de Cazucá. Over 5,000 students are directly served in our schools—but approximately 30,000 people benefit from our programmes. For example, in working to combat malnutrition we not only provide students with nourishing meals and evaluate their nutritional status, but we also provide their parents with critical information on health and nutrition.
In addition to physical-health services, the foundation’s programmes support emotional health through counselling and exposure to the arts as well as through advice for families and parenting classes.
We also support the broader community. On any given day our school buildings are hubs of activity—providing a range of services, including adult-literacy classes, youth-leadership development, access to libraries and computer training. Perhaps most importantly, we have also begun to form parent co-operatives focused on teaching parents and on income-generating activities aimed at ensuring that families are financially secure.
We are now in the process of taking this success story to other parts of the world through our non-profit Barefoot Foundation, based in the United States.
If our foundation can bring quality education to some of the poorest children in the world there is no reason why governments can’t do the same thing. Our schools in Colombia are proving each and every day that no matter where a child is from, no matter how poor children are, they can thrive if given the chance.
I refuse to believe that it isn’t possible to educate every child. By establishing a Global Fund for Education in 2010 we will invest in these children’s future—and help to secure our own.
[From Shakira’s essay in The Economist]
In addition to the essay, Shakira gave a speech at Oxford University on Monday, and made a call to “send 30,000 educators to Afghanistan, not 30,000 soldiers.” She also set her own goal: “That in 2010, world education became more important than world domination.” Um… Shakira, we’re not interested in world domination anymore. We’re just trying to get by at this point. But bless your heart. Though her goals are lofty, her heart, mind and wallet are in the right place!
I guess that I’m extremely cynical, but I remember that, when Shakira started, she was far from this Angelina Jolie/Bono proto-clone who makes lofty speeches about the suffering of others, in an attempt to promote themselves and achieve political and social prominence. She was an ordinary pop starlet, and only started using this Messianic pap when she saw that her main public (a.k.a. middle class Latin American girls), like to hear these sorts of things.
Yes, it’s noble that Shakira wants to spread education around the world. It would also be noble if she didn’t just do her “I’m a Christian, I want to have babies and I want World Peace” little number whenever she is promoting a new album.
Lofty goals indeed, but her mind and heart are only in one place: her wallet and looking for ways to fill it even more… Even if it requires using the suffering of others to improve your public image.
Wow, that is the most cynical thing I’ve read in a loong time. Some people do good works & help others because they actually want to help others. Shaki can hardly be called a fame whore
I think shakira is doing a great thing, her foundation Piez Descalzo has been doing great things since 2003 , they have gave education ,nutrition ,..etx to over 15,000 people in latin america.
I remenber hearing one of her speech for a award she won for her charity and she said something along the lines that she accepted the award has a represantive of the nuns and anonymous volutarys.
She’s such a tiny person! See you dont have to be an amazon to be A GODDESS! She doesnt pretend to be anything either, she does care.
Im not liking the heels though…eh.
didn’t she give a substantial amount of $$$ a few years back to the poor or something of s.america. (no ? b/c I’m sure of it….it was in the millions) I think this chica is actually legit. I don’t think she does it to look good or for pr. Like she said, she lived it (I know she wasn’t poor growing up, but I’m sure she witnessed much more first hand then us here in USA) And so what if she’s a Christian, who the f**k cares. Like Soul2soul said, “educate your mind, free your soul”
The Economist is making a mockery of serious journalism by allowing hipshaking Shakira to pen an article for them. As far as I know, she never even graduated from high school, so since when is she an authority on world matters? She belongs in music industry magazines only. Not even fashion, since she rarely gets it right, and that pleated grandma style dress is hideous and she needs her roots done.
I love Shakira: an intelligent, talented, beautiful, independent woman! I’ve respected her ever since she insisted on learning English so that she could write her own lyrics for her first English-language CD. She’s done a lot of charity work in the past, and I don’t think it’s for the PR. Plus, she looks adorable in that dress (don’t love the shoes, though).
Wow. Lot of haters here. Can’t we just say “good job” for helping out people? Whether it’s for fame or some other reason, the reality is that there are children who can afford to go to school now because of her and her money.
@pont neuf: as much as i personally dislike her music, shakira was ALWAYS known as an activist in south america/colombia and has always done charity work… she is well-respected in the hispanic community for her activism on behalf of children and the poor WELL BEFORE becoming a pop star in america when she crossed-over…
/rant over 🙂
She has been doing so much behind closed doors for so long, I can’t believe anyone would call her a fame whore now. I am glad she is as active as she is, and if she can bring light to a sh…situation, well more power to her. Not everyone has the desire to adopt a kid from every country you want to spotlight.