‘Global’ Prince William ‘realizes you have got to have America on side’

Prince William has been “focused” on “winning” America for a few years now. He keeps showing up uninvited and uninspired, like he expects to get a rock star reception simply because of his title. This has led to some hilariously janky Britsplaining of American culture, as royal commentators struggle to explain why dull, ashy, awkward William would ever appeal to Americans. “Americans love that William is dutiful! They love Earthshot! They can’t get enough of eggplant emojis!” Now, following his New York trip, William has convinced himself that Americans truly want more of him, and his office is clearly telling royal reporters “William plans to be spending A LOT of time in America now.” Which is why we get sh-t like this:

Prince William is letting himself be more relaxed and “open” with the public when out and about on official duties, a royal commentator noted. The Prince of Wales has taken on an increasing number of duties since succeeding his father the King in the new role – and part of his strategy includes winning over the American public.

Mail on Sunday Assistant Editor Kate Mansey argued the new approach follows William’s realisation that “you have got to have America on side” in the aftermath of Prince Harry’s multiple blows to the Royal Family’s image over the past three years. Mansey suggested the Prince and Princess of Wales “will be maintaining that [aura] of ‘majesty’ – why they are separate and why they are different, whilst also being ‘of the people, for the people’,” as part of their new approach.

She added: “They know very well what they do well. This is the authentic couple that we have been waiting to see for years. Like William letting slip he went for a run in Central Park one morning. Obviously, people will draw that comparison with the paparazzi chase with Meghan and Harry in New York. This is really interesting to see, that William is allowing himself to be more open.”

Speaking to True Royalty’s The Royal Beat, Mansey also welcomed reports suggesting that William and Kate are now seeking to trademark their Royal Foundation in the United States. She noted philanthropy remains a key area where they could reap considerable approval and win over support across the Pond.

She added: “The issue of philanthropy is so developed in America… it’s more part of the setup of how American communities and businesses work. So you do have to have a foothold in America if you are starting a big global initiative. I think Prince William realises you have got to have America on side. He is very serious about the fact that his role is global. He is on the world stage, and he is going to make the most of it.”

And the King is expected to invest in William and Kate’s popularity by urging them to travel abroad more extensively, according to a source. They told OK! magazine: “The King is very aware of the role the younger members of the Royal Family play in spreading the word to a wider and younger audience. Media and audience tests demonstrate the success of William and Kate’s engagement with the younger generation through social media and public appearances. So it’s important that they continue this success into 2024 and beyond.”

[From The Daily Mail]

“I think Prince William realises you have got to have America on side” and “So you do have to have a foothold in America if you are starting a big global initiative.” So this man was in his 40s before he realized that the monarchy’s relevance is directly tied to American tourism money, American philanthropy and American media? They’re saying it like it’s a good thing, that William has finally gotten this key part of the British monarchy’s relevancy formula. Too bad William didn’t realize this when he was smearing his American sister-in-law as “too American” and “a soap opera actress” and “a sociopath.” Too bad William only developed an interest in all things American as soon as Harry and Meghan escaped. And it’s really too bad that William only gives a sh-t about America now, to the exclusion of Commonwealth countries and everywhere else.

Photos courtesy of Backgrid, Cover Images.

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

175 Responses to “‘Global’ Prince William ‘realizes you have got to have America on side’”

Comments are Closed

We close comments on older posts to fight comment spam.

  1. Escondista says:

    The United States’ existence hinges on the rejection of monarchy.

    • Truthiness says:

      And we’ve beaten them in 2 wars to prove it. Weren’t the boos they got at the Celtics game loud enough?

      • Taytanish says:

        Yeah William, when in New York, wears waders to the Hudson River to go clam chasing while Harry, while in New York, wears his business suit and meets important people and holds Healthy Minds summits. I like that William is keeping America to side, LOL.🤣🤣🤣.
        Can I make a suggestion dear prince William? Why not try and stay in your country and try to “make it” there? At least that’s what Harry is doing!! Harry is staying right here in his adopted country and trying to “make it” here, he not trying to clout chase? Aaahh, William, William, the one most obsessed with aubergine🍆🍆emojis, the most ever booed prince of the realms, at 41 years old he has no idea what to do with his time? He is the Prince of Wales, FFSs, like its so sad!!!

      • Shoesies says:

        PeggySue despises Americans. The only reason he wants to be here is to get our $$$ and be more popular than Harry. TOB stays incandescent.

      • Mika says:

        Sure hope that second war you are referring to isn’t 1812 because.. while I will say the treaty of Ghent favoured American territorial gains in the north east… Canada does still exist…

      • Where'sMyTiara says:

        LMAO – that Celtics game will live in infamy.
        The Other Brother’s obsession with Harry, Meghan, their doings, and where the live is nothing short of pathological.

    • MyCatLovesTV says:

      Exactly right!

    • StillDouchesOfCambridge says:

      i can’t wait for the announcement that Eggplant Willie and KKKhate have been pulling a Will&Jada on us for do many years

    • AnnaKist says:

      How;s the plan to become a global statesman coming along, Bill 😂😂?

      • Kathleen Williams says:

        That’s on hold. He is too busy trying to be the sexy beast that the UK media tell him that he is,.

  2. Lau says:

    Why does it sound like he’s going to get his tenth house in the us ?

    • JT says:

      It does sound like he’s going to need a home here, so that he can be a global statesman in America. This should be embarrassing for the monarchy and the British government. The future king of the UK is trying to live out his American dream in NYC, while doing fuckall for his own country. Pegs is never this excited about anything having to do with the UK. To me it sounds like he’s about to start a whole new life in the US and leave the UK behind. Sounds familiar.

      • Macky says:

        Jt it does sound like he is about to pull a harry. At least harry tried in a UK country first. Maybe William tried Africa first and it was undercover. Apparently he was always visiting there. That didn’t work out so now he is coming to the usa to beg and get away from Kate.
        Kate couldn’t survive here. Kate can barely survive windsor and where ever that country house is. I wouldn’t be surprised if she lived with her parents.

    • CaliGirl says:

      All I can say is, William, stay out of California. We don’t want him here. Of course, he’s already in the state of cluelessness.

  3. Lucy says:

    America be like “I don’t know her”

    • Julie says:

      😂💯

    • Geegee says:

      Poor sad Peggy. Why don’t they love me? Everyone always loves me best. I’m the heir. Love me dammit!

    • Darlington says:

      “…the Prince and Princess of Wales “will be maintaining that [aura] of ‘majesty’ – why they are separate and why they are different, whilst also being ‘of the people, for the people’,” as part of their new approach.”

      Never change. I mean, I don’t think I need to add anything to this mess of misunderstanding about the US, and where all this “effort” will get them. Okay, I’m laughing. I’ll add that.

    • Feeshalori says:

      They are so, so out in left field in the way they perceive us, and think how we perceive them. They must believe they can swan in and retake the colonies. You know where they can put that belief and their “aura of majesty.”

  4. equality says:

    Aren’t they supposed to be ‘of the people, for the people’ who are actually under the monarch’s rule? This makes it seem like they see the US as W&K’s Saudi Arabia and they will fly over for big bags of cash. Does that really endear them to people?

    • BeanieBean says:

      Hmm, now I’m thinking they deliberately left out the ‘by the people’. Can’t get too carried away! People might think they don’t need the monarchy!

  5. Izzy says:

    Are these people for fcking real? They really think that comparing his “jog in the park” to a car chase reminiscent of the one that killed his mother is a good look?

    America knows which royals are worth their weight and which ones are rubbish. Willy Wanker should focus on the Commonwealth countries, else there won’t be any Commonwealth left by the time he takes the throne.

    • AnneL says:

      That line was nuts! William goes for a jog in Central Park and they think anyone will naturally start thinking about a car/pap chase?! No. Sometimes a jog is just a jog. Also, it’s New York. There are a lot of famous people there, not to mention a lot of busy, distracted people. If I’m in the park in NYC and I see a tall, bald guy with a clenched jaw running along, I might think for about half a second that the guy bears a passing resemblance to Prince William. Then my mind is on something else entirely.

    • Robert Phillips says:

      William is never going to take the crown. The English people hate Charles and Camilla. And they despise William. The only people propping them up are the wealthy over there now. And the reporters whose only source of income is reporting on the monarchy. But the worse their economy gets. The more there will be a call to get rid of them. And if they honestly think they are going to just go away with all those castles and jewels they better think again. There just might be an homage to the Russian revolution.

      • Aunt Agatha says:

        I think you’re onto something here. If England kicks out the Tories after the mess they’ve made of the place, William could be next

    • TigerMcQueen says:

      Also “let slip” that he went for a jog. My eyes rolled so hard I hurt myself.

    • Jaded says:

      Most Commonwealth countries couldn’t give a good jackshid about Will.I.Am, aka Peg. Canada has no love for those two and if it was an easy task to unload the Wanker Family and rewrite our Constitution we would do it in a heartbeat.

      • TheFarmer'sWife says:

        Is it just me or is Bill starting to look like a Sponge Bob Square Pants character? Chuckles and Bill are so bad at their “jobs,” that maybe they will implode and we won’t have to rewrite our Constitution! The “royals” (I can’t capitalize it–a bottle of Crown Royal has more class) are making a strong, very public, case for disowning them or whatever one does with the leftovers from a bygone era.

  6. Jais says:

    See, if Harry hadn’t moved to America, I don’t think William would care about getting America onside. His creepy obsession with his brother is pathological.

    • SAS says:

      100%

      Such a weird look. Do any other European royals give a fuck about their popularity outside of their own country?

      • notasugarhere says:

        Some do, others only go the the US for specific events and don’t care about popularity.

        Years ago Mary and Fred of Denmark hired two Aussie PR companies to try to boost their US profile. Honest to God, they made a website for one of their short trips to NYC named ‘FredandMaryinNewYork(dot)com’ or some nonsense.

        Felipe and Letizia go to the US every couple of years to interact with the Spanish diaspora. One of the groups Letizia works with for bilingual education is based in the US iirc. Didn’t Felipe address the UN?

        Maxima works with microfinance for the UN so she shows up in NYC sometimes.

        Daniel and Victoria went a few times related to promoting Swedish business. Not promoting themselves, promoting Swedish business.

        The three Scandi royal families go to NYC to support the Scandinavian culture group there.

        The Luxes have been to Wisconsin a couple times to visit the Lux diaspora. Something like 1 in 5 people left Lux and settled in the US during economic hard times in Lux.

    • Scooby Gang says:

      Exactly, @Jais!

      Can we start a rumor that H&M are leaving America and moving elsewhere? I’d love to see how fast W drops his interest in America and shifts focus to wherever he thinks H&M’s new home will be.

      Oooh! We can say H&M are moving to the moon. Yes. Let’s do that. Bye, William!

    • jemmy says:

      @Jais -This has ALWAYS BEEN THE ISSUE & WHY WandK did not want H to marry SIL – because with SIL in the picture , the accolades from the US would ALWAYS BE DIVIDED . On one hand they want access to the US & the undiluted adulation but on the other hand they do not want someone like SIL in the family -racially & intellectually. Hence the reason at trying to drive SIL out, along with smearing and destroying her that she ends up totally useless – a living dead. Well times are different and MM has refused to be silenced. Since their plan hasn’t clearly worked, they are now resorting to their current tactics.
      The RF DOES need the US given US’s place in the world as the pre eminent country in the world. Without the US affirmation , then what U have is a diminished RF since they would not have that platform to blow up the RF propaganda. Had TOB / RF had a different orientation, he would have realised this and welcomed SIL. They probably thought they could roughshod SIL and get away with it but hadn’t bargained for H’s response and more importantly that times have shifted – the idea of a “M” is on a downward slide.

      It would take a true heart of sincerity on Wand K’s part to acknowledge their wrongs and then perhaps get H& wife back on track, treat them nicely with respect & then put in the work.. Only then perhaps can Wand start to gain popularity in the US.

      As an aside , had H married anyone else ie an English Rose, they might not have been any issues as H would not have been able to leave- the English Rose would not want to bring shame and disgrace to her family not to talk of the hounding her family would have received . H was able to get awy with leaving beaucse of MM

      • Taytanish says:

        Let’s get real here, shall we? First of all, Meghan has a name, its Meghan DoS or Meghan Markle, her name is NOT WanK SIL or Harry’s wife or even “the wife” and some like to call her.
        Secondly, the notion that “….. WanK’s part ………and then perhaps get H& wife back on track” is simply preposterous. WanK have absolutely NO power to “put Harry and Meghan back on track”, none.
        And I’m cackling at “William should put the Harry ‘n wife back on track and treat them nice then gain popularity in the US”, LOL, is this for real?
        And you really got to stop blaming Meghan for Harry leaving, this is just absurd. Harry was going to leave that family either way, he said so many, many times and many, many, years before he even met Meghan. Harry is on record saying, while he was in Afghanistan, that the only time he is happy is when he is away from that country and that family, period. Meghan did not make Harry leave, this “Megxit” $hit has got to stop right here, Harry is a man with his own agency. You folks have drunk the “Harry is dumb” coolaid for far too long your perceptions are so twisted. Even if Harry had married a English rose, he would have left, he was very unhappy way, way before he met Meghan. What are you even talking about?

      • jemmy says:

        @Taytanish – I dont know why I am doing this as I do not owe you an explanation. This is a forum where people who defend Harry & his wife air their opinions. It’s a FREE WORLD AND I CAN WRITE AS I WISH TO

        To call what I have said ( or anyone for that that matter) twisted is indeed a POOR REFLECTION ON YOU & UR POSSIBLY BEING AN UNPLEASANT AND UNSAVOURY CHARACTER – I would suggest that you take a leaf from other commentators on this site as well Harry & Meghan whom you so vigorously defend and learn to be courteous to others

        However to put you out t of your misery I would say 1STLY -I think U are taking what I have written THE WRONG WAY

        2NDLY -I AM NOT BLAMING H’s wife for H leaving the RF . H may have well intended to do so.it’s one thing for Harry wanting to leave the RF and another to actually put that into action .

        Given UK’s influence in the world& ties to Europe, I very much doubt H would have been able to “escape the RF without these countries betraying him – worse still if H married an English Rose. I say this as someone who is intimately knowledgeable of the UK having lived there for decades.

        He has in great part been able to pull this given his wife’s ethnicity and the broader considerations even with the Commonwealth countries who see H’s wife as one of them – again due to her being biracial . At no time I have suggested anyone is dumb for that matter

        I believe & I am entitled to have an opinion just as you have that he has been able to pull this feat due to his wife – her being an American & Biracial . The RF are treading very carefully given the wider implications of the disagreement on its relationship with the commonwealth nations as quite a number of the citizenry of these nations see H’s wife as one of theirs. Case in point, WandK’s disastrous tour of Jamaica.

        In terms of H steeping back into the RF, H has mentioned that H believes in the monarchy . He left as its been widely reported due to him being the scapegoat ie being used to improve the media profile of more senior royals whilst negative stories were planted about them. Nothing suggests that that narrative cannot be changed . However as most people have noted TOB’s actions have in no measure contributed to H & his wife leaving the UK. Whether you like or not H is a Prince and at no time has he said he does not wish to serve. Should that include coming back to the UK , then it stands to reason that the current state of things would need to change for that to happen . I haven’t said anything that in you mind may be construed as being “twisted” .If is is twisted in your mind ” then perhaps U may need to go check out your mental health . I would also suggest that you try to read and understand what is being written before jumping to stupid conclusions Thanks

      • Christine says:

        But really, does it physically hurt you to type Meghan’s name? Or just M, since you use H for Harry? You get how it is extremely off putting for anyone to be referred to as so and so’s wife, right?

      • jemmy says:

        @Christine- Generally people ( on this side of the Atlantic at least) use abbreviations / acronyms for LEGAL reasons not and not in any disrespectful to the persons being defended.

        One does not wish for one tube sued for libel… maybe you do . I don’t.

      • Christine says:

        And the M? You’re fully capable of using H for Harry.

      • Taytanish says:

        @Jemmy, please don’t get angry, my post wasn’t intended to get you this upset, sorry. And, please don’t feel like you owe me anything, this site doesn’t belong to me and I’m not even a mod so……I responded to “As an aside , had H married anyone else ie an English Rose, they might not have been any issues as H would not have been able to leave- the English Rose would not want to bring shame and disgrace to her family not to talk of the hounding her family would have received . H was able to get awy with leaving beaucse of MM”
        You yourself said if Harry had married a “English rose” (meaning a white English woman I suppose), “they would not have had any issues as H WOULD NOT HAVE BEEN ABLE TO LEAVE…ENGLISH ROSE WOULD NOT WANT TO BRIND SHAME AND DISGRACE TO THE FAMILY etc, etc (I guess Harry leaving brough shame and disgrace to the BRF is what you mean here)”. Don’t get mad because you get some pushback on typing twisted perceptions that Harry only left because he married a black woman and that black woman MADE Harry leave. Once again, Meghan did NOT make Harry leave, Harry left on his own, he is a man with his own agency and can make decisions on his own, not based on what color of skin the woman he married to is. Why are we still even touting this British tabloid hogwash that Harry left because of Meghan, Meghan stole Harry from his family etc, etc in this day and era? Hold Harry accountable for all the decisions HARRY has made for himself and his little family, Meghan did not make him leave.

      • jemmy says:

        @Christine- I really dont have time for the to and fro re how I choose to write. Not really concerned if it offends your sensibility . Those in the know would understand. You don’t like what and how I write, then sod it!!! . I would suggest u take the advice give to W on this platform & restrain from the nitpicking aka pettiness – it’s different if I was writing derogatory stuff about those being defended.

        @Taytanish- It seemed as if u were offended. Apologies accepted. I wasn’t in any shape blaming M for H leaving. I was only stating that this was possible Primarily because M is an American – the only country the brits TRULY respect is the US . The RF Know this and understand they need to go “gently ” with dissing M as they also want the other benefits that the stand to gain with their association with the US ie bragging rights of being loved by the US- I believe this is one of the reasons for W’s obsession with H . H &M HAVE ” Stolen his thunder.

        Could H have left successfully if he wasn’t married to M ? DOUBTFUL. Why? Any other country would likely have buckled under the “pressure” from RF not to associate with H and would have made life very difficult for the couple. Take a look at the post at no 40 of this thread to get a full picture .(he said to effect that the US govt officials were asked not to be seen with H & M)

        If the US govt could be subject to this pressure, just imagine other countries that are less powerful and then you may be able to gt the picture.

        H’s saving grace is that his wife is a US citizen with a strong backingfrom her fellow Americans [ not all I must add] and the Brits know better than to toy with a US citizen.

      • Wannabefarmer says:

        What Taytanish said.

        And to add to that, stop infantilizing Harry. This is a man who rose to the rank of Captain in the army (and by all reports would have gone higher if not for the institution who decided he could not outrank TOB. In other words, dimmed his light), who has travelled the world representing that wretched firm; he is a global figure/statesman because of this work, not to mention all his other achievements). This is what the adorers of willy and kate don’t seem to get as well. They claim they love these people but constantly infantilize and hence disrespect them. They are all grown azz people, some more evolved and mature than others, but adults nonetheless who are make choices.

      • JEMMY says:

        @Wannabefarmer et all- I can see you speak as an American so would have a different outlook since you are based in the US.
        I SPEAK AS A UK Citizen with a British perspective- I stand by what I say. You may not agree with what I say but us brits would say the same thing- not because we think H is incapable of independent thought but rather because of the reach of the State Machinery -nationally and Internationally. Say or instance if H had married an English Lady and had “eloped” to the US, the machinery would put “pressure ” on the wife , her family , friends and get them to spill the news on H . Non consent by H’s wife would lead to some form of censure , backlisting of the wife’s family & after a while would ” betray” H & his whereabouts . Now extend that thought to other nations except the US and u get the picture. However the US is different given its geographical size and also your relationship with the BM.

        H may have wanted to leave the RF but without M’s input of putting herself out there , exploring on how to make a life out of what they have been dealt , H would have found it hard to sustain the departure. M’s resilience is a major contributory factor to H being able to settle in the US. I cannot see an “English Rose being able to take the pressure from the media /RF as we have seen- she would have capulated.

        This would also explain Wilnot and Cannot’s obsession with M – they know she’s consequential to H & M being able to call the bluff of RF & cannot take her down as she is miles ahead of them in the “game”. She is intelligent , articulate and resilient . They reckon she is the one to overcome. And there is nothin wrong with M being a person

        Although H may be liked in the US, I am not so sure he could have roughened it out in the US if he was married to someone else who wasn’t an American with M’s disposition.

        This is all I would say on the subject- I am not against the couple. I am only saying that H has been able to achieve is objective due to his marriage to M as M as a biracial American has a huge backing of her community & country behind her, I dont this I have said anything derogatory . So this is where I would leave it. Thanks

  7. RoyalBlue says:

    Why doesn’t he focus on the Duchy business and learning to speak Welsh?

    • Athena says:

      Why are they talking about America? Shouldn’t William priority right now be the Middle East as a great statesman whose life mission is to bring peace to that region.

      • RoyalBlue says:

        And while he’s at it, could he please fix the homelessness problem in Britain and heal Broken Britain.

        So much on his to-do list, so little time.

      • AC says:

        Yeah exactly. we already have the weirdos like Santos, Greene and Boebert etc in our news cycles. And Trump and his MAGAs.. ugh…. I don’t know if the American press will care if W is here but the US-UK has this very close love/hate relationship, I think if he’s here a lot, it would just put the US pretty much in the middle. It’s all about his own personal ambitions.

    • Ohwell says:

      Bill has no interest in the Duchy business or learning Welsh or any other language. His interest is in harassing his brother and gaining popularity based on his status.

      He is a very odd man. I wonder if he was raised to have little to no emotional intelligence.

  8. Roo says:

    Look, haven’t we Americans suffered enough? We had Trump for four years and he’s threatening to come back, Covid is rising and so are all the antivaxxers who didn’t learn the first time, and they’re bringing RFK Jr along with them. We have the short end of the stick. Do we really deserve more William and Kate!? I’m pleading with the Universe for a break.

    • Pip says:

      Come on: we have all that plus Brexit, Johnson, Truss AND lousy weather. You can keep him!

      You’re welcome 🙂

      • Truthiness says:

        Liz ” I couldn’t outlast a head of lettuce” Truss was just visiting Ted Cruz in Texas. And here I thought Texas didn’t want foreigners trickling in. Pretty pathetic if the most hated politician in the senate is the best you can do here.

  9. Eurydice says:

    Nowhere does he ever explain why the British monarchy needs America on its side. The only thing I see here is that William, yet again, wants something Harry has. And yes, philanthropy is well developed in the US, but for causes people care about, not to raise money to benefit the richest people on the planet. US billionaires are pledging half their wealth to charities – let’s see the RF do that.

    And I have to laugh at Charles encouraging W&K to travel and “spread the word.” What word? “Look at us, we’re wonderful”? What in the world is he talking about?

    • SussexWatcher says:

      I have 2 working theories on his obsession with America. The first is his mistress and future second wife lives here so he needs a reason to be here often. The second is sort of related, he’s trying to get the US press on his side so when he does divorce his first wife, (he thinks) the press here – who are not under his super injunctions and can’t be bullied like the RRs – will go easy on him and not report his cheating and other dirty deeds (specifically the thing that would turn our stomachs if we knew).

      We’ll see soon. I feel like his house of cards will be falling down any day now.

      • Eurydice says:

        I don’t know about an American mistress – a booty call once a year doesn’t seem like devotion. Maybe she’s super secretly traveling to the UK?

        As for the US press, I’ll just go by what happened with Charles – lots of sordid details were revealed and reported, but Charles still married Camilla and still became king. Unless the monarchy collapses or William turns out to be a serial killer, nothing will prevent him from becoming the next king. Kate is the one who will fade away

      • AC says:

        @sussexwatcher – I don’t know about an American mistress now, but IMO finding a 2nd wife here is not that far off from your original statement(or trying to get attention from someone in the past).
        We all know that he wants what Harry has that’s for sure and he lives here now with his American family.

  10. Flowerlake says:

    I think this obsession with the USA is ridiculous.
    He is not a singer trying to ‘make it in America’.

    It’s also very unstateman like in my opinion.

    • Debbie says:

      He’s very much not a statesman though.

    • Flowerlake says:

      I am very much aware of that, thanks.

      Calling him a statesman was one of the ways they propped him up and that was what I was being sarcastic about.

  11. This is just I need America to like me better than Harry. If he wishes to make even more of a fool of himself than he should continue down this path of nonsensical bull💩. America made it clear they didn’t even know who he was when he came here and those that showed up at the fire house thought it was his brother who would be visiting but ok Peg keep believing the yes men you hired who tell you that this is working just fine for you.

    • lululubrown says:

      That Mansey woman is trying to make some coins from her article. She doesn’t even believe this bullshit that she’s typing. Like most RR’s, they are there to blow smoke up the Windsor’s ass. The last time Will was here, he was left with eggs on his face. How embarrassing it was for him to have the Mayor cancel on him and for everyone on the internet to make fun of him for wading in shitty water and not getting an invite to sit at the adult table and engage with the World leaders at the UN Summit.

      Finally, a few royal reporters admitted it was a Bust and called it a “damp Squip”. They know that the reminding royals suck, but they have to pay their bills.

  12. Mslove says:

    No, America does not need to fund Peg’s vanity projects. Nobody knows who he is, even. Ronald McDonald is more popular than Pegs could ever dream of being.

  13. K8erade says:

    If it weren’t for this site, I’d never have known about William’s movements in America. Even if I didn’t pay attention to the gossip, I just don’t see how the average America cares about this. Now I do think the conservative elements in the media do care about William as more of an anti-woke counterpoint to Harry and Meghan but all that means is that William is a useful tool in America, that’s all.

    • Eurydice says:

      Even conservatives don’t care that much about the RF. Some talking heads trying to be current might bring up H&M because of their name recognition, but there are no battles to be won in the US by fighting Harry and Meghan. Just as there are no battles to be won by embracing W&K. The only use for the RF is as content for the gossip sites and Will can give them plenty of that by just staying home and getting a divorce.

    • Gabby says:

      Well he certainly is a tool, but that “useful” part is debatable.

    • Cassie says:

      I have noticed our friend Mary Pester is absent from the conversations .
      I hope she is doing ok ❤

  14. WithTheAmerican says:

    I struggle to try to keep an open mind, but I have to say the years of this family bashing Meghan for being American really stay with me. being so open about it in all of their media and then this guy wanting to court Americans at the same time is a lot.

    they’ve just gone so publicly rabid with their hatred of Americans. We all get that their work ethos is different and I’m sure Americans can be annoying in that sense but if you want America on your side, probably should have kept that stuff to themselves.

    And tell Camilla to stop making fun of our president, as if she’s got anything on Dr. Jill.

    • jemma says:

      @WithTheAmerican – it’s for people like you whose perception of WandK is now negative that they had wanted to destroy the marriage & then make SIL look bad as if it’s her fault. Had H not married his wife , then the affection that the US had for Diana their mother would to a greater extent be transferred to WandK as the future heir and to a lesser extent to H. However given what has transpired, that pool of affection is now been shared more than it would have been because SIL is American & being one of yours, you would naturally gravitate towards your own.

      TOB’s obsession would still be rabid even if H married an English Rose given the belief that nobody should be more popular than the king of which TOB would be some day . The difference with the English Rose is that she would have understood & would have submitted to the rules. Even if she rebelled, all of that would have been contained with the UK and would not have had any impact on TOB’s appeal in the US or if it did then it probably would not have as much as it now the case with SIL.

      Also H would not have been able to step back as he has as the English Rose would not have had the boldness to follow through wit h the plan. Her parents standing in society would completely be obliterated and would therefore not follow through with it. This would also explain why English Roses who want their freedom would rather not marry into the RF in the first place.

      • Feebee says:

        @Jemma where it concerns America, I don’t think Diana’s popularity would automatically have been extended to William and Kate. Diana’s personality, people skills and her commitment to issues was what made her popular (along with her fashion and a beauty that came with within too). William has none of that. Where as Harry has his military service, charity and humanitarian work, ease with people and perhaps getting naked in Vegas all those years ago in the plus column. It would have been interesting to see how it may have played out without Meghan but obviously with her he is living his best life in the US and a much happier man for it. He is Diana’s heir.

      • BeanieBean says:

        This makes English women sound rather pathetic. It also assumes Harry’s many issues with being ‘the spare’ would suddenly & magically have disappeared had he married someone English. No, he just doesn’t seem like the kind of guy to continue to sublimate his wants & needs to his abusers.
        And truly, if you can type W, K, and H, surely you can type M. This libel issue is nonsense.

      • jemmy says:

        @BeanieBean – No actually if H had married an English Rose , chances are that t he issues would still be there as they currently are but would have made worse as he probably would not have been able to step back from front line duties & if he did , her English family would be painted as traitors – I’m not sure anyone would want to go through that harrassment from the BM/RF. Hard to believe / Yes but it is what it is. The class system is truly still alive , well and kicking the UK

        I also addressed W as TOB/ Wilnot, K as Cant and M as SIL or wife – others have also done on this website – It is a non- issue as the descriptions as far M is concerned reflect who she is ( except perhaps in the minds of those who are super imposing their own inadequacies on whatever acronyms/ abbreviations that are being used- in which case deal with it). I will continue to write as I deem fit . There are more important things to squabble over.

      • Becks1 says:

        No one else on this site calls Meghan the “SIL” like you have been doing in these posts. You are reducing her to Williams SIL and nothing else.

        Multiple people now have said that they have an issue with how you refer to Meghan. Why not take that feedback and reflect on it rather than doubling down?

        You are fairly new here as far as I know and it is always a good idea to get the general feel for an online forum before posting and pushing back against any feedback.

        Frankly I think all the nicknames on here are overdone and are getting old but alas, I’m not the queen of the world.

      • JEMMY says:

        @Becks1 – Thanks Queen Bee. Perhaps I should bow or curtsy to you or the powers that be as defined / dictated by your royal highness b/4 having the audacity to post stuff.. get a life!!

        PS: I stand by what I have previously said. The only rules of engagement I am ware of is being polite – none on the use of language. If you are unhappy I suggest you go take a dip in a pool/ river closest to you. No need to be salty.Thanks

  15. Becks1 says:

    I admit, the britsplaining of US culture makes me laugh. The part where she’s talking about maintaining the “majesty” and being a little “separate” and “different” but also “of the people” – the vast majority of Americans, even the more royalist among us, don’t believe in a monarchy. We don’t believe that someone is better because of their birth status.

    I don’t think the British press realizes how strong the American dream still is today. we LOVE self-made millionaires because it makes us all think “hey that could be me.” We love stories of companies starting in a garage or Papa John selling his camaro or whatever to start selling pizzas (I mean he’s a shit person, but Americans do eat that shit pizza in truckloads, LOL.) There is nothing about a hereditary monarchy that is obtainable for a person who isn’t born into it. Okay yes you can marry into it but we see how they treat the married-ins, and you’re still not of “royal blood.” Phrases like “blood princesses” are just not something that is part of our culture.

    There is nothing about William that is aspirational because there is nothing that William has earned. Harry has worked for things in his life, Harry has earned things, Harry’s status as a prince is a quirk in terms of his appeal, its not his whole appeal. William seems to think that he can waltz into NYC, wave his arms around and go ‘I am the prince of wales!” and people will clamor to meet him. Nah, we’d rather meet Jose Andres.

    • Eurydice says:

      Yes, in a way, Harry is part of that American dream – an immigrant whose home country is no longer hospitable for some reason or another and who finds the opportunity to make a new life in the US. Of course, a prince and rich and a celebrity, but still the same storyline.

      William is part of the group that gets along just fine in the home country – the right class, demographics, politics, education, expectations. If he weren’t a prince he’d blend right in with all the others.

    • MF says:

      I had the same thought: if W&K think remaining “majestic” and “separate and different” is a good idea, they fundamentally misunderstand our culture here. We despise people who are born into privilege (see: the whole nepo baby conversation) and we despise class barriers.

      • Christine says:

        They really don’t understand why Americans loved Diana, and now Harry, at the most basic level. It’s definitely not “majesty”.

    • Nic919 says:

      William of course doesn’t understand history or how the current Americans are either descendants of the revolutionaries or immigrants who came to the States for a better life because they believe that a better life can be obtained based on hard work and not who you married.

      The Loyalists went to Canada after the war and even in canada, the desire for monarchy now is not high. It is inertia more than anything. And Quebec in particular seems to be avoided by them when they visit.

      It also helps to not trash your American sister in law if you want to be viewed positively by them.

      • AMTC says:

        @NIC919 there are also indigenous Americans and descendants of slaves, colonisation and slavery of course being key contributors to the current wealth of the RF.

      • Nic919 says:

        Sorry I should have been clearer that it is the white Americans that come from either of those groups. William wants their attention because it is clear that he does not care about anyone who isn’t white.

    • jjva says:

      “There is nothing about William that is aspirational because there is nothing that William has earned.”

      Damn, Becks1, you put that so succinctly and so well. Thanks.

  16. SussexWatcher says:

    OMG he is just so grotesque. The epitome of getting the face you deserve! Get some frickin chapstick, for god’s sake! Stop looking at people like you hate them and are about to unhinge your second jaw and bite their face off.

    And also, no, no and no. Go away, Penis With Teeth. As evidenced by you and your Gopher-haired bewigged first wife being booed in Boston and you being completely ignored (repeatedly) in New York, it’s obvious we don’t want you here.

    Does your second wife live in the US? Is that why you’re trying to normalize your appearances here? We started a revolution to show you how much we don’t want you here so just go harass some unlucky folks in the UK and save us all from your gross, bullying, obsessedwithmybrother self. Shoo.

  17. girl_ninja says:

    Will is like that guy who can’t take no for an answer. Leave us alone Will!

  18. gimmeabreak says:

    He’ll only “make the most of it” in terms of benefiting himself. He’s not fit for the role he was born to and he’s failed to rise to the occasion.

    • WaterDragon says:

      If Wills isn’t snarling ferally like a shark, his facial expressions seem to reflect either smelly farts or distaste at forced interactions with his “lessors” which in his micro-brain includes everyone but HIMSELF and blood royals. He is the epitome of unpleasantness and lack of charisma.

  19. Snuffles says:

    This is going to blow up in Peggy’s face. You can’t roll up in here, take bags of cash and think the occasional photo op and pretending to be keen is going to cut it. These Americans are going to want a return on their investment. And British honors and titles won’t mean shit to them.

    • MoxyLady007 says:

      That’s the thing. Americans want actual tangible results for their investments. Even the billionaires.

      Why the hell doesn’t he go to China? Billionaires everywhere and I bet many of them would find it amusing to take photos with him.

  20. Miranda says:

    “will be maintaining that [aura] of ‘majesty’ – why they are separate and why they are different…”

    Oh my god, just f–k the f–k off. You need muck boots just to read this horseshit. The whole point of America is that we decided many, many years ago that the British monarchy is NOT special. We don’t care whose inbred balls you swam out of.

    • Feeshalori says:

      Yes, we Americans don’t tug at our forelocks at people who consider themselves to be our betters. That went out with the American revolution. And if William and Kate come swanning over here expecting us to be bowled over by their so-called majesty, oh boy, they’ll have a rude American awakening. Stay home, Willie, and take care of your own messes and stop chasing your brother and his wife.

      • MoxyLady007 says:

        Americans do tend to “worship” our favorite celebrities. But we also hold them to standards. Some of them probably quite horrible and probably terrible for the mental health of the celebrity people we “love”.

        But we also respect their work. And their hustle. And their tenacity. Hearing that they tried for years and years before “making it” or that they are close to their families, that they raise money for people experiencing homelessness, stand up and protest against pipelines or for union rights, care about climate change, get their vaccines, promote voting and being a part of the solution to the problems facing us all….

      • Feeshalori says:

        That’s the difference between William and the popular celebrities in our country. We like their talent and their efforts, especially if they started from the bottom, and spent many years breaking into their craft. We also call them out when they do wrong. However, William expects a glow up here based on who he is and not what he does. He needs to put his money where his mouth is and make the effort in his own country rather than looking here and trying to gain popularity, which is a lost cause. And everyone damn well knows what his motivation is in his sudden interest in America, because of the presence and popularity of the Sussexes.

  21. Brassy Rebel says:

    America tossed their sorry asses over 240 years ago. Now, William has decided they’ve got to have us “onside”? Has any nation, after decolonizing itself, decided they want back in? This whole narrative is serious delusion.

  22. Blithe says:

    I think William is confusing “America” with People magazine. Countdown to a rude awakening — especially if they slip outside their carefully curated “new approach “. I’m just waiting for the moment when an adorable school kid asks one of them about Meghan, Harry, and “Spare”.

    • Christine says:

      You really nailed it. Judging by People, and their excessive use of exclamation points every time Cannot and Willnot successfully leave the house, he could have the impression that he is well liked here.

  23. s808 says:

    Weird, he didn’t give a damn about America until both of his obsessions relocated here after he ran them out of the UK. She may be being blocked from these America trips, but at least Katie girl is putting her wiglet to work in Britain.

    • zebz says:

      i know right. this obsession with america is all william and his fixations. he is the only one that gives a crap about this in the BRF. he refuses to give it a rest. he chased the sussexes away from the uk, and now is trying to invade their space and lives on the other side of the world. if he could, he would’ve bought a home in montecito by now.

      his obssesion with meghan especially is beyond the pale. he has made his “relationship” to her more then it ever is or was in his mind and bullied her to be important in her life. he is giving kate a run for her money in the stalking department.

      • jemmy says:

        @zebz – SPOT ON

      • jemmy says:

        @zebz. Some one on the thread commented that it seems the Daily Fail is going easy on Meghan as they seem to have eased up on writing negative stories about M. For instance , The UK Daily Express ( part of Daily Fail) are now saying that M has more in common with Cant.

        Having realised that perhaps their negative campaign against M is not as effective as they had hoped, I think they are trying a different tactics of boosting Cant’s reputation by tagging Cant along with Meghan so as to “transfer Meghan’s shine on Cant by association and once their goal has been completed revert to their nasty selves.

        I hope Harry & Meghan do not fall for any of this nonsense.

      • Jais says:

        Eh, the DF and the express and whatever other tabloids write not terrible/positive stories about Harry and Meghan sometimes and they always have. They’re offering equal opportunity clickbait. They’ll take the clicks how ever they can get them. But at the end of the day, Harry and Meghan sued the DF. There is no real concern that they will fall for anything. They’ve made it clear they don’t deal with the rota tabloids and block them from their events.

  24. Lara (The Other) says:

    No!
    He is goingt to be the head of state. Imagine another (elected) head of state claiming he needs the US to start a global initiative. Imagine another head of state coming to another country and starting an initiative without partnering with the gouventment of this state first?
    Thats terrible diplomacy. His only job outside the UK is state visits and shaking hands. Maybe start a joined international initiative with other heads of stated (if asked).
    The highest art would be trying to negotiate peace treaties as a honest broker between enemy states (but thats way too far over his head).
    He might appear to be a dump celebrity trying to make it in the US, but he will have an official fuction and I think its embarrasing behaviour for the future head of state and the US gouventment is more than polite to tolerate him.

  25. @BelizeEmpower says:

    This writer is really unhinged making giant leaps to draw crazy conclusions like this one: “Like William letting slip he went for a run in Central Park one morning. Obviously, people will draw that comparison with the paparazzi chase with Meghan and Harry in New York.” This being an apparent example of Willy being more “open” to the common people whilst keeping his “aura” of majesty? Well I be darned.

  26. Ohwell says:

    American money, American philanthropy and American media.

    This is it.

    Particularly the US money and media.

    • kirk says:

      More like
      “American money,”
      “American money” redirected from “American philanthropy” to royal pet projects, and
      “American media”, but controlled and throttled.

  27. Cel2495 says:

    Haven’t we suffer enough?! What have we done to deserve this limp 🍆 ? Please stay over there and focus on eradicating homelessness, food and housing insecurity in the UK, learn Welch for Pete’s sake and leave us the heck alone. We have enough problems as it is to deal with this nonsense.

  28. Kingston says:

    Perspective, folks! Let’s apply a bit of perspective to this wet dream.

    First of all, whose wet dream is this, i:e this sudden desire to shamelessly start courting America out loud?

    I’ll remind you. Do u recall who holds the RF puppet strings? Hint: it’s the same folks who used to bleat that H&M neeeeeeeeeed the monarchy and titles to succeed in america; the same ones that bleat that H&M neeeeeeeed to show their kids more in order to be popular; the same ones who order WanK to bring out their kids on demand; etc etc etc.

    WanK know who their puppetmasters are and so do we. Said puppetmasters hv been bleating at H&M, trying to get their attention. To no avail.

    So they’ve now resorted to goading the cowardly, manipulable bully, who only asks “how high” when his masters tell him to jump.

    Getting bully to focus on America is their way of justifying their continued voyeurism on the Sussexes.

  29. notasugarhere says:

    William needs a history lesson. The United States dumped these people starting in 1776. May the 15 remaining countries who keep them in their ‘jobs’ follow that example.

    Get over it, Bill, and move on.

  30. Amy Bee says:

    I still remember when these same people were saying that William and Kate’s focus was the Commonwealth and the UK and that they had no interest in being global or in the US. How things have changed? William and his advisors are stupid.

  31. Jay says:

    Yeah, I don’t think Americans care about the “majesty” of the Wales.

    If TOB really wants to win over America, he’ll have to do a full court press – morning shows where he answers personal questions without reservations, late night shows where he shows he is game and not too stuffy, or straight up poking fun at himself at Saturday night live or the like. I cannot imagine him acquitting himself well in any of these venues, can you?

    • MoxyLady007 says:

      I cannot imagine this stiff 💩 being able to be casual, relaxed or affable in any setting.

      I know I’ve said it before. But the man doesn’t have any friends. Any. Neither does his wife. Yes probably because he’s abusive and has isolated her but she’s also a terrible human being. Not that that seems to be a negative trait in their circles – more of a pre requisite.

      But besides the Jason goon he hired and the people he does “clubbing” with – just thinking of rich people past times – he’s not golfing or playing polo or shooting or hunting or having house parties with anyone who wants to share what a great fun guy he is with the media. Now he’s a crack up. Etc. it’s all from these stale “sources” who sound like they haven’t seen the sun or the outside world since the 1950’s.

      • jemmy says:

        @MoxyLady- He does have friends some / many of which are also friends with his brother .I think I read in one of the national newspapers that they were warned not to publicly comment on the on going feud b/w the brothers . The BM were also asked not to speak negatively of the RF.

      • aftershocks says:

        @Jemmy, how do you know whether the friends H & W shared in their teens and twenties, are still friends with both of them today? I highly doubt it. Harry said in Spare that he lost friends. The true friends of Harry are still in contact with him, such as Charlie van Straubenzee, Nicky Scott, H’s mentor, Mark Dyer, et al. Likely, most of the hangers-on around Willy are still there because of his heir status, and/or perhaps they are snobby aristo blowhards with little common sense, mirroring Willileaks’ worst character traits.

      • jemmy says:

        @aftershocks says: H said he has lost SOME , not all of his friends
        Information as published by the British press often cite Willian & Harry having friends in common even going back to both KC and friend parents being friends- being British , I should know perhaps better than you.

        You may want to take a look at this link
        https://www.hellomagazine.com/royalty/20220904149898/who-is-in-prince-harry-close-friends-find-out-his-inner-circle/

        The royals normally have a tight circle of friends whom they have known since childhood , with the friendship often starting from the time of their parents and then passed down / on to the children

  32. QuiteContrary says:

    I have to force myself to click on a story that has William’s face on it. He’s just so relentlessly DULL.

  33. Blackapinay says:

    He’s got an entire Commonwealth to be concerned about and not a former colony that flat out rejected the Crown.

    • Lily says:

      Kate and William seem more concerned about the area around London and America than the Commonwealth or the rest of the UK. That shows me influence, status and wealth is so much more important to them than other people who can do nothing for them. Just makes them you run of the mill humans with money.

  34. ariel says:

    In my mid 20s- my family was together for Christmas. It was the 90s and my dad had a great plaid green shirt on. And i said – spontaneously- i like your shirt. May i have it?
    And he said yes, and i’m sure later washed and hung it up and gave it to me.
    2 days later my sister said to my dad- hey i like your shirt. Can i have it?
    And he laughed and said no. Because it was obvious she didn’t actually want it- she just wanted it because i had gotten something- and while, when we were kids, my mother bent over backwards to make sure we got the same/equal things- we were now in our mid/late 20s (she’s older) – and he just thought it was ridiculous.
    He died when i was 29. I’m 51, I still have that shirt.

    When i think of william- i think of this. He is only interested in having things that Harry has, getting things that Harry got.

    He is a grown man with a family of his own and a batsh*t family legacy wherein he has already inherited immense wealth and will eventually obtain OBSCENE wealth.
    And what he really seems to want- is to be more successful at any thing harry is already successful at.

    GROW UP!

  35. Eliora says:

    “They know very well what they do well. This is the authentic couple that we have been waiting to see for years. Like William letting slip he went for a run in Central Park one morning. Obviously, people will draw that comparison with the paparazzi chase with Meghan and Harry in New York. This is really interesting to see, that William is allowing himself to be more open.”

    LMAO!!! What a weird way to acknowledge that the heir to the British throne is a none MFing factor to the majority of Americans, lol.

    Nobody cared about Wills in CP because nobody cares about Wills in America. He isn’t our Prince and he looks like an inauthentic, mean-spirited, elitist a-hole. Kate isn’t any better either. William’s new found obsession with all things America is clearly an H&M obsession. Only the toxic British press pretends not to see that.

  36. MrsH says:

    I have so many thoughts on this.

    The ego on this Creep. You are not a global statesman! You are, sadly, the future king of a few countries. America is not one of them. America does not need OR want you. I hope that this leads to your downfall because not only will most Americans reject you, but if you keep focusing on America and ignore your countries and commonwealth then that will likely start pissing off more of those citizens- you know, the citizens that pay for your @ss and who can vote for their independence from your stupid toxic family.

    Also, I don’t think WanK have ever studied as hard in their life except for now – when they created a school for themselves called “Harry and Meghan University ” and have decided to become honor roll students in that curriculum. I swear to god I totally see them having full fledged lessons on Harry and Meghan wardrobe, comportment, interests, gestures, etc… the probably also have a Harry and Meghan’s Favorite things list of objects they too need to obtain.

    Would not be surprised if they have a full time PI watching HandM

    I have never seen two people of such elevated stature constantly showing their issues to the world like these two.

  37. Mads says:

    This ridiculous, petulant fool is going to be the king of 14 countries and, possibly, the Head of the Commonwealth yet his prime focus is on smearing his brother and sister-in-law and a one-sided PR battle. He is enabled by Charles, the institution and a client media. I know why the media do it but not Charles or the institution because, ultimately, it’s damaging the monarchy with his lack of attention toward those other countries.

    • Unblinkered says:

      And his lack of attention to the people of the UK.
      Why isn’t he being made to run the really excellent organisations his father created, The Prince’s Trust and The Prince’s Foundation? They both did so much good for ordinary folks throughout the UK especially youngsters.
      William is out of control and in real danger of devaluing the UK overseas. He is not a politican: start doing some actual useful royal work like his father did when PoW

      • aftershocks says:

        Cain has no interest in the Prince’s Trust. That’s why Chuck named his cousin, David (2nd Earl Snowden) to oversee his pet project. I believe David took over managing the Prince’s Trust sometime before Chuck became King. I’m not sure who manages the Prince’s Foundation. Willy has the RF, which others manage. He surely don’t need nor is he interested in his father’s Foundation.

      • Lily says:

        William was offered the Prince’s Trust and rejected the offer.

  38. L4Frimaire says:

    Maybe he’s interested in America, not just to stalk Harry, but because it doesn’t seem like Charles wants to send them on too many royal trips. Except for Rugby matches , they haven’t really done anything on behalf of the crown recently. Strictly UK only day trips. They’re sending Sofiesta and Edward’s, and even the Gloucesters on short state trips abroad. Also, this tells me that he’s a bit bored with Earthshot. That trip is next month and there is no hype or build up. Instead they’re talking about some nonexistent run in Central Park and comparing it to a car chase.

    • Jais says:

      Hmm. It’s interesting. Does Charles not want them to go on trips? I actually can’t tell and think he might want them to and William is the one avoiding trips. Bc he doesn’t want to travel with Kate and bc the last one was such a disaster.

  39. Saucy&Sassy says:

    Ohwell above said “American money, American philanthropy and American media.”

    I think that’s part of it. The problem Wont has is that Americans are not going to give money to you and then never know how it is used. We NEVER hear whether WanK get money for the Royal Foundation, and if they do, how is it spent?

    Another problem Wont has is that he won’t allow American media around him. The only way he would is if he controlled what questions they could ask. American media isn’t going to agree with that. Well, there are a few tabloids which might let him do that, but who will read that? Not the masses.

    I think we’ve all said at least one time in the past that the bm were doing a real number on the UK and how it’s perceived globally now. They have gone so hard on the fact that Meghan is black AND that she’s American. I believe we all know how American’s are perceived in the UK (I’m not talking about everyone in the UK.)

    Here’s the thing: you simply cannot look down your nose at us, and then expect us to be ‘won’ over. Guess what? One of the ways that Americans are different? We’re more direct. I assure you that you do NOT want to try that crap here. You’ll get more than boos.

    • MrsCope says:

      I don’t think Wills has the attention span or the time to devote to this side of the pond. Come to think of it, I don’t think he has work ethic and he certainly doesn’t have an understanding of the lay of the land. The BM backed itself into a corner with all the pearl clutching, frenzy whipping and hate mongering. The nitpicking doesn’t have legs on a global scale. They may or may not be on a vacation right now. So? Oh heavens, where are there children? Stop it. How dare they utter the phrase “mental health?” The same way all us normies do. They had a seven-car security detail! OK…

      I did a Google news search last week during the NY Summit. H+M headlines were largely how amazing Meghan looked and focused on the substance of that event. Wills and Kate headlines were all about eggplant emojis, spicy food and sweaty bald heads. Who is the power player and who is the celebrity again?

  40. Ameerah M says:

    “GO BACK TO YOUR COUNTRY!” William. We don’t want you.

  41. North of Boston says:

    For some who pretends to be a global statesman and who says words and does vague gestures towards America, he and his team still don’t realize that the entire world can see what he, TRF, RR say and do in Britain.

    Which means that here in America we are aware that Wills and the Family/Firm he’s a leading part of, let’s see, just for starters:

    – trashed talked, oppressed and tried to destroy an American citizen who had done nothing wrong
    – marginalized that same woman and her American citizen children, likening one to an ape
    – did everything in their power to make the Sussexes, including 3 US Citizens and their loved ones (incl Doris) vulnerable to security threats, harm in the UK, Canada, and the US (conspiring with UK security panels to strip or limit the Sussexes protection during visits to the UK, withdrawing security while simultaneously leaking their safe house location in Canada, stalking and menacing them in NYC)
    – trash talked the US President (Camilla blabbering about Biden being gassy)
    – repeatedly used official government diplomatic and national secrets channels to pressure POTUS, FLOTUS and other high ranking officials into the adult version of not sitting with the Sussexes at the school lunch table

    And also, Wills, just FYI, when you, your mouthpieces say things *publicly* like that you have got to get America ‘on side’ – in outlets that Americans will see – you sound like an myopic entitled idiot or a mafioso who either expects others to just line up in support of whatever you’re doing, with a waft of King George-Esqe I’m going to make you fall in line. Onside means certain things in British English, but in American English it is primarily used in sports, a player is ‘onside’ if they’re on the correct position of a play, to receive or move the ball, Outside of sports it is rarely used unless there is some element of coercion, manipulation going on to bring someone onside. (Unless there’s some specialized jargon I’m unaware of)

    On board, in your corner, in support of, or willing to support or collaborate are much better ways to describe having someone thinking what you’re doing is generally worthwhile or worth their while and being willing to support your efforts.

  42. Wellyaknow says:

    This sounds like camp Kate and maybe the RR trying to let William know he needs to bring her because they have nothing to write about on these trips since they are so managed and boring. I don’t believe Charles wants more stupidly of William around the globe it looks bad that will is obsessed with Harry’s every move and he isn’t going to common wealth countries. This is desperate and not the right message of wanting to swoon us garish Americans, home to the “sooooo American” Duchess that only thinks about money, fame and power according to will. He kicked out Harry just chase him around America lol 😂

  43. AC says:

    I’ve actually made a sarcastic/joking comment a month or so ago in which William wants to live in the US part of the year(Harry is here, overall he’s liked in the US, he lives here which makes him more relatable and HM are gaining more influence. Their community in Montecito does like them also). I guess that joking comment was not far off where William does seem to want to live here ..Lolz . Or as someone commented above, If possible live here full time. The whole American obsession has been mentioned a variety of times with Easter eggs here and there, and it just seems accelerating. My take with this article. He’s being temperamental and impatient and wants to do it Now(ASAP).
    And they’re trying hard to justify (esp in the UK) why it’s important he’s going to be here in the US A Lot.

  44. Scm154 says:

    @kaiser, Please post the zoomed out NYC photos of W posing with a couple of other people in the river and with only a few photographers on the river bank. It perfectly exemplifies how everything was a performative photo op and his visit was of no interest to New Yorkers.

  45. Libra says:

    I tell myself to relax; he’s not spending time here. His attention span is so short and memory retention so bad that by tomorrow he will have forgotten all about us. We will go the way of world peace, poverty and housing the homeless.

  46. MyWilliams7@aol.com says:

    Christmas on a cracker am I gonna have to drive an hour an a half to Boston and dump ALL the tea I have in my cupboards in the harbor to get these people to F*** all the way off?

    William is the guy that keeps leaving notes in your locker after you told him YOU DON’T WANNA GO TO THE DANCE WITH HIM!

    If I hear one more idiot in the BM talk about this imaginary jog in the park in NYC like this makes William relatable my head will explode!!! Dumb asses, it means (if it did happen) NO ONE CARES ABOUT HIM! Everyone and their dog had an i-phone on them and no one thought it was worthy to record and egg that runs – just for the memes alone (runny eggs? Come on the jokes write themselves) it would have been worth it! But no one cared – instead they focused on picking up their dog poop which is far more exciting.

    Harry won! Get over it! Harry got ALL the charisma, the better teeth, the empathy, the sense of humor, the looks, the gorgeous wife, the house in California with NINE MILLION BATHROOMS, the dogs, his own money, Diana’s emotional sensitivity and appeal, and his pillows stay on his couches where they belong!!!

    Just stay in England with Mr. Burns in her aluminum foil tiara and watch her eat a bowl of buttons for breakfast with watered down nonfat milk – on VIDEO CHAT since you don’t live with her! You got what you wanted all of England to yourself and a delusional press to worship your every move.

    • Eurydice says:

      Lol, so true about everyone and their cameras. H&M took a quick and quiet vacation to the Caribbean and still someone was able to get a photo of their backs and have it end up in the DM. How could William’s Central Park jog not be noticed, especially since his NYC trip had been announced for months? Either nobody cared, or it didn’t happen.

      • SIde Eye says:

        Spot on Eurydice! It’s one or the other – neither of which looks good. Only the BM would see something positive in that after hitting their crack pipes.

      • Christine says:

        Okay, this comment cracked me up. It’s extra pathetic that Willnot can’t get a photo snapped while he runs through Central Freaking Park, and Harry and Meghan are snapped on an island I had never heard of before today, and I’ve been to St. Lucia, which is kinda close.

  47. HeatherC says:

    Conservative MAGA type will love him. They love mediocre white men who fall up in life even if they’re the worst person for any given job. The rest of us will roll our eyes and ignore them, like we did their NYC visit.

    • Macky says:

      They will like the idea of him but not for to long. I’m an American and I don’t want to help William but he would last less than a year with regular Maga. With the press I can see him surviving a few years. He would always be on thin ice.

      • Christine says:

        I agree. It will never work out between magas and Willnot. Magas will want him to publicly say something to support some agenda or person, and Willnot will want them praising his global statesmanship, which completely undermines the “make America great again” slogan.

        Both sides are enamored with each other’s whiteness, and that’s about the end of it.

        Both sides are frequently incandescent with rage, so it will be funny to watch at least.

  48. JudyB says:

    I am getting really tired of this “English Rose” thing. When we American’s think English women, unfortunately, we think Kate, Camilla, and possibly Margaret Thatcher. So, which one of these is or was an “English Rose”??

    And as far as the insult of saying someone is “too American,” I still can’t see what they mean by that other than someone (mostly women) being too ambitious, too hard-working, too outspoken, and too independent? Or am I missing something about how the Brits see Americans?

    There are some basic insults in each of these names and using them will not get American’s on the side of the royalty or the women they marry.

    • jemmy says:

      @JudyB
      “English Rose” refers to a beautiful lady typically associate with being ENGLISH ie culturally from England whose ancestry dates back to hundreds or thousand of years

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/English_rose_(epithet)

      The emphasis is on being “English” which is different from being “British”. Being British encompasses all other nationalities including Wales, Scots, any non English with UK Citizenship.

      • JudyB says:

        I know what the phrase means and did not ask for a definition, but I believe usage of the phrase is ridiculous and insulting in this modern age. The media continually is pointing out that Harry would not have left the country if he had married one of these mythical “roses.” And I also know the English are also British.

        Also, every living human being has ancestry that “dates back to hundreds or thousand of years.” And there is no such thing as certain people having an “old family” because we all have families that link back thousands, if not millions of years. Such statements about upper classes coming from “old families” are phrases that try to maintain a class-based, and possibly racist society. It also sounds as if you are making a distinction that English “roses” are better than young women in Scotland, Wales, and Northern Ireland.

        My personal ancestry includes people from Scotland, Wales, England, Ireland, and Germany, and none of them sprang magically without an older family! They came to America looking for a better life where class structure did not keep them socially stratified by an “upper” class who wanted to maintain their personal supposed “superiority.” And the vast majority of them thrived here from this freedom.

      • Eurydice says:

        @JudyB – I don’t think people here are saying “English rose” is better than any other type of woman, but I can say that people out there have thought so. I’m Greek (don’t know about millennia, but certainly going back to the 1700’s), with blonde hair, blue eyes and an olive complexion. Without the pink cheeks of the English rose, I was considered “exotic” and not quite right in both the UK and the US. Later, I was offered membership in an old Boston institution as part of their effort to become diverse and inclusive. As you say, ridiculous and insulting, and kind of baffling to anyone looking at me today – they would just see another white lady. These attitudes persist, especially when it comes to the monarchy, an institution that’s the antithesis of “modern age” and to the British media that props up the monarchy.

      • Krista says:

        I’d never heard this phrase before Kate, and when I think of British women I think of Kate Winslet, Emma Watson, and The Spice Girls. Before Meghan I never thought about the RF at all.

    • Ohwell says:

      The tabloids want to control Harry. Marrying a woman from outside the UK lessens their control of him. Or, if he marries an English woman then she might of had reverence for the monarchy and would accepted the abuse. Or maybe the tabloids are insulting English woman by seeing them a bland, boring and lame compared to the ambitious, hardworking, outspoken Americans. Or its just pure racism that he did not marry a full white woman. The English Rose is code for a lot of things.

    • Christine says:

      When I think of what an “English rose” is, I think of Diana, since Elton put it in her funeral song. She is exactly what I imagine, but I think it is used by the British media as a dog whistle.

      • windyriver says:

        Diana was the ideal of an “English rose”, with in fact a more aristocratic background than the Windsors. It’s used as a dog whistle where Meghan’s concerned, but it’s also irrelevant to the real issue, which is, both Diana and Meghan naturally attracted the attention the Windsors believe belongs solely to the blood royals, that is their right by virtue of hierarchy. Diana’s fate was sealed early on when people on the wrong (Charles’) side of crowds in Australia were disappointed they weren’t seeing Diana, while things for Meghan went rapidly downhill after the huge success of the Oceana tour. Meghan made it clear in the documentary she had been willing to do whatever it took to make things work, but the attention of the people and the press was something neither she, nor Diana, could control. IMO, any woman Harry married, who had Meghan’s unique personal gifts, would ultimately run into the same problem, even be she the rosiest of roses, like Diana.

      • Christine says:

        Word, windyriver.

  49. Mrs. Smith says:

    This story delights me! Americans know how this is gonna go for him: no one cares. I say he should lean into his USA phase. Really put his back into it. Move to NYC or wherever and see what happens to his “popularity.” It would be hilarious to watch as everyone shrugs, no one bows or scrapes or comes running when he snaps his fingers. $10 says he’ll get punched in the face within 6 months.

  50. Patricia says:

    I will repeat what I said to Fergie last week, we don’t want you or your husband here. So , dear Peggy, we don’t want you and your annoying wife here either.Stay in Great Britain and leave us alone. Thankfully, Benjamin Franklin, John Adams and John Jay gave your country it’s walking papers. We can do it again, you know. I’d be the first to sign up for it.

    • AC says:

      I don’t know. They’re paying polls to tell us W is so popular in the US, they’ve tried to bully a US Govt agency to get Harry’s visa application, and paying trolls to communicate that we here dislike HM (constant hashtags of Harry and Meghan are finished on Twitter. When In reality majority of Americans are neutral or doesn’t even give too much thought. And some actually like HM). But they have a very entitled perception that there’s still some ownership of the US(just as they’re condescending towards Americans there’s also some type of strange ownership that they think they have over.). I think it’s all the countries that they have colonized, it’s not just the US, and it’s already stuck in their mindset.
      My kids love some of the new gen z singers/songwriters who are popular all over the world. With some of our popular gen z artists going across the Atlantic for promos or concerts, I would see some comments on somehow they also have a subtle “claim” to them – I just get dumbfounded by those.

    • Christine says:

      I can’t help it, I still giggle every time I think about Fergie thinking she was really making her case when she said she needed to help Pedo pay the bills.

      I can’t think of anything less appealing, to an American audience. I think she thinks she was being very modern, getting a big girl job, I am woman, hear me roar, but…it’s Pedo.

      The fact that she used this as an incentive to be given a talk show in the U.S. is a facepalm moment, for me.

      You just look like the sad sack that legitimately wants to fix the roof on the giant mansion your pedophile ex got from his mommy. It’s pathetic, and I don’t have bitchy thoughts about Sarah Ferguson, in general.

  51. Feebee says:

    He’s deliberately choosing projects he thinks needs the US in on to be successful. There are heaps of initiatives he could probably get underway with support from Europe, Canada, and Australia. Once proven there then he could take an actual winner of a project to the US.

    But no. Because that’s not really what’s at play here.

  52. Beverley says:

    Pegs, just stay away. We Black Americans haven’t forgotten that you loathe your SIL and her children. We all know why.

    If you try to “win” America, you might have to answer some hard questions from the American press – questions about you affairs, your violent rage, and your racism. They’d probably ask you about assaulting Prince Harry. You won’t have the sycophantic British press to shield you from the difficult questions. And we all know you can’t handle the scrutiny.

    Forget about the USA. We have no prince, and we don’t want you.

  53. J.ferber says:

    What I get from this is William wants to grift off America like Donald Trump. He has the false belief (lie) that he and Kate are “dutiful” and “authentic.”. In what world? Certainly not on this side of the pond. We can spot a fraud in a New York minute (though unfortunately some asinine voters don’t care if you are a fraud). No one here will ever get a hard-on for William or Kate. He can’t fill his pockets with his philanthropy bullshit. Doesn’t he already have the Duchy millions at his disposal? DON’T COME HERE, Will. We see you and we don’t like what we see. Oh, and you never ran through Central Park, liar. And even if you did, so what? No one cares!

  54. Tessa says:

    William needs to pay attention to Wales. He can let slip that he goes jogging there.

  55. Tessa says:

    Take prince keen to see hamilton. He is descended through three ancestral lines from George 3 after all.

  56. Patricia says:

    William must have a new American girlfriend,if he’s wanting to spend more time in the USA.

  57. Lily says:

    The anti-Americanism in William’s criticism of Meghan made me realize the British upper class feels negatively toward Americans in general. That turned me off of them and the monarchy permanently. I’m not going to waste my time liking people who wouldn’t bother giving me a chance as a human being because of my nationality. Then, you add on the class element and I probably would lay down my fork at the dinner table in the wrong location and offend them anyway. They’re simply the most ridiculous type of people. You have to be just like them or you don’t exist. It’s such a middle school child mentality.

    • In Meghan’s case being labelled “too American” has always been and will always be British upper crust code for “too n-word”, which is why Lord Peggy Aubergine sees no conflict whatsoever in the relentless pursuit of his agenda to recolonise you Yanks – complete with a fresh King George (who is being visibly groomed for the job) on the throne.

  58. roooth says:

    Did Willnot actually go for a run in Central Park, or was that just more UK gaslighting? The only released pic of the supposed “run” is an obvious photoshop. First, it shows #WillyWanker running by the Hudson River, with a bridge in the background – that’s NOT in Central Park. Second, the image of Willy running is old, its from the race Willy had with Harry & Kate several years ago.

    Its not just that the UK #HateForHire liars gaslight all the time, its that they are so lazy about it. They don’t even try to be believable