Some studios have pushed back certain films’ release dates because of the SAG-AFTRA strike, and the need to have actors promoting the bigger films. But the mid-budget and indie films are mostly being released regardless of SAG-waivers. That means that un-waivered films need to be promoted somehow, which is why there are suddenly tons of interviews with directors. I don’t know the last time a men’s magazine interviewed David Fincher, but here we are. Fincher spoke to British GQ about his new film, The Killer, starring Michael Fassbender. It doesn’t sound like Fassbender will be doing much or any promo. So we get Fincher talking about AI and sh-t. Some highlights:
He loves making B-movies: “I’ve always liked B-movies. And Fight Club to Panic Room, what’s that about? I don’t know, it’s kind of where your interests take you. And I spend a lot of time developing three or four things for every one thing I end up doing.”
On Fight Club: “I haven’t seen it in 20 years. And I don’t want to… It’s like looking at your grade school pictures, or something. “Yeah, I was there.”
The Killer’s soundtrack is heavy on The Smiths: “I always knew that I wanted to use “How Soon is Now?” because I love the guitar. And I love the idea of somebody going, “what Johnny Marr is doing here is my meditation.” I just thought it was amusing. But originally, we had an entire soundtrack that was Joy Division, Siouxsie and the Banshees, full-on pre-goth. It was really cool, and really interesting, but you kept asking yourself, “Is he a music critic?”…I love the idea of a guy who has a mixtape to go and kill people. But if we have all of these disparate musical influences, are we missing an opportunity to see into this guy is? So The Smiths became a kind of stained glass window into who this guy was.
His thoughts on AI: “I think AI’s a really powerful tool. And for my money, I have not heard an AI Beatles song that compares to “Eleanor Rigby.” So until somebody plays an AI song that knocks me out… maybe that’s just where we’re at now, and I may be eating my words in a year, but I think ultimately, the thing that we respond to in poetry, and writing, and songwriting, and photography, is the personal bent. The thing that’s making it…[human].”
On AI for actors: “As it relates to actors… look, we had a few lines of dialogue in The Killer that we had looped but we couldn’t get right, with Michael, so he said it into an iPhone in an environment that was not conducive to being used as a voiceover, and we could take it and process it through the hours of voiceover that we had, and spit back out, and it was clean, and it was the music of his voice. And that’s incredibly handy to have.
This goes to the heart of something I have never understood about AI – “so he said it into an iPhone in an environment that was not conducive to being used as a voiceover, and we could take it and process it through the hours of voiceover that we had, and spit back out…” Like, how inefficient is that, honestly? You could make an arrangement for Fassbender to speak the dialogue you need in a better situation (into an iPhone!) wherever he was or you could spend hours and hours coming up with this funky AI work-around? That’s what I don’t get about using AI actors in general too – would it not be simpler and more reasonable to just hire actual actors? As for never watching Fight Club… that film was well-made, but I would imagine the fans’ cultish devotion to it is a turnoff for Fincher too.
Photos courtesy of Avalon Red.
IMO, Fight Club is one of the best movies ever. *Shrugs
Yup this imo it can be viewed and analyzed one million ways.
When I was in high school in the late 80s we didn’t consider Siouxsie and the Banshees and Joy Division “pre-goth” we considered it actual goth. We were goth and it’s what we listened to. That and The Smiths, The Cure, Bauhaus, The Jesus and Mary Chain, Echo and The Bunnymen were all goth to us.
EXACTLY! To me pre-Goth would be Punk…since that’s where the MAJORITY of Goth G-ds came from❤️
I honestly find it suspicious they wouldn’t just send Michael Fassbender an email or text asking him to act out the requested dialogue and send it back to them and then provide notes if they want it done a different way. Its quick and has no extra cost.
Who runs a voice through a machine for a couple of hours instead of asking someone to re-record? This tells me its directors who like the idea of AI. They like the idea of not having to deal with actors and using machines to make their movies.
Good luck with getting people to watch when movie attendance has steeply declined because movies have become soulless profit driven bloated messes.
Mr. Whatever is a recording engineer, and frequently does looping and voiceovers for tv and film. My understanding of how it works, from what I’ve gleaned from everything he’s told me about his job, is that Fassbender just being able to call that one line in over the phone would be a million times easier. If they’ve completed filming, then Fassbender probably isn’t even in the same country anymore. To rerecord the one line in a studio, first they’d need to find a studio close to wherever he is at the moment, coordinate everyone’s schedules to get him in there, pay for minimum studio time (usually an hour), send files over to sync on a video monitor, etc… -or- Fassbender can just speak into his phone for a second whenever and wherever he wants.
I think the whole AI thing is ridiculous too, but on closer reading of Fincher’s comments I think he was saying that because they already had hours of good quality voice over work from Fassbender, they could have him fix a line of dialogue simply by recording it onto an iPhone, feeding it into the AI system so it could immediately clean up the raw take and make it sound like the pro takes. This is definitely easier than any other way of recording. He was not saying that the process TAKES hours, but that they HAD hours of pro voice over for the AI to match.
With the accompanying photos all I see is KFC Colonel Sanders.