Prince Harry will likely attend a UK service for Invictus’s tenth anniversary

During last year’s Dusseldorf Invictus Games, the Windsors and their media handlers pouted, cried, lied, screamed and tried to pretend that Prince William and Kate’s sad events were in direct competition to the global headlines the Sussexes were getting. The Windsors also refused to acknowledge Invictus entirely, and they blanked the entire British Invictus team. No tweets of support, no well-wishes from the king, nothing. There were even a few pieces about how the British Invictus team thought the Windsors were being petty and mean-spirited (true story). The whole thing became even funnier when NATO Joint Force Commander General Guglielmo Miglietta turned up in Dusseldorf and he brought a NATO delegation of 1100 personnel, military family members and students. The Sussexes did a photo-op with General Miglietta and the NATO group, and you can guess who was incandescent with rage about all of that.

Interestingly enough, the UK’s Minister for Veterans’ Affairs Johnny Mercer did turn up in Germany halfway through the games. He even sat with Harry and Meghan for the volleyball final, and Mercer and Harry were seen deep in conversation several times. Mercer also went on the record about how Invictus is “genuinely life changing” and “You can’t underestimate or underplay the huge impact [Harry has] had on veterans’ care in the UK over many years. As a veteran myself, I’m incredibly grateful, but I know that the nation is incredibly grateful for everything he’s done so far.” Mercer didn’t even play both sides for the domestic audience – he said Harry is doing amazing work and Invictus is wonderful. I bring up Johnny Mercer because I think he’s largely behind a new effort to bring the 2027 Invictus Games to Britain. Oh, and Harry will attend an Invictus event in London in May.

The Duke of Sussex is expected to return to Britain in May for a service at St Paul’s Cathedral to mark the tenth anniversary of the Invictus Games. The milestone has prompted an effort by the government to bring Prince Harry’s sporting competition for wounded servicemen and women back to Britain. A multimillion-pound government bid, backed by private finance, has been made to host the event in Birmingham in 2027.

The team at the Cabinet Office who are behind the plan hope to finance a four-year programme, which would improve rehabilitation prospects and sporting opportunities for veterans and civilians. The scheme has won the support of the Ministry of Defence and the Royal British Legion. Leading the bid is Johnny Mercer, the minister for veterans’ affairs, who was flown to Birmingham for treatment after being medically evacuated from Afghanistan.

He said: “It feels like the right time and the right place. The biggest power of recovery has always been in sport, has always been in Invictus and the Duke of Sussex led the way when he set these Games up ten years ago. It feels like a natural rounding of the circle to come back to the UK and we’re going to do everything we can to win the bid.”

Mercer will host a symposium at the NEC in Birmingham on March 21 to discuss the plan with potential donors. Among those speaking at the event will be JJ Chalmers, the television presenter and Invictus Games medallist who was injured in a bomb blast while serving with the Royal Marines in Afghanistan in 2011.

Harry, who this week made a 25-hour trip to Britain to see his father after the King’s cancer diagnosis, is expected to announce the winning city for the 2027 Games later this year.

A source close to the project said: “Harry has indicated that he is comfortable coming back for a British-based Invictus Games and we understand that the Games have always had the support of the rest of the royal family.”

Others hope that Britain hosting the Games could help to soothe tensions between the duke and his family. A supporter of Birmingham’s bid said: “I and many others very much hope that this could provide a timeline for a way in which the duke and the rest of the royal family might find a way to come together in support of a worthwhile cause.”

If Birmingham beats its US rival bidder of Washington, it will bring Harry and Meghan back to the UK together for the first time since the late Queen’s funeral in September 2022.

[From The Times]

So it’s between Birmingham and Washington? Didn’t New Zealand plan to make a bid as well? In any case, I absolutely hope that Harry rejects any and all efforts to bring Invictus back to the UK. This is so obviously a trap – the press, the government and the royals are all salivating at the idea of three years of “what will happen when the Sussexes come in 2027” storylines. Harry would be giving them too much lead time to plan out how they could hurt Meghan and everyone else. It’s fascinating though, to watch as the British government openly longs for the Sussex sparkle. Remember how all of those royal reporters and photographers ran to Dusseldorf to cover them? Yeah. As for the Invictus service in May… it would be funny if Meghan skips it. God, the tantrums, I can hear them now.

PS… I was trying to do the math on the games, traditionally the games are 14-16 months apart – wouldn’t the next games, after Vancouver (Feb. 2025), be held in the late summer of 2026?

Photos courtesy of Avalon Red, Cover Images.

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

74 Responses to “Prince Harry will likely attend a UK service for Invictus’s tenth anniversary”

Comments are Closed

We close comments on older posts to fight comment spam.

  1. I think it is a trap too. Invictus was held in London I believe in 2014? I hope they don’t take the bait and I hope it goes to some place else. Can you just imagine the crap that would go on. For Harry and Meg’s safety it should be held elsewhere.

    • Lau says:

      That and the royal family would find many ways to make it all about themselves and pretend they have anything to do with IG.

      • Krista says:

        I was thinking this wouldn’t be supported by the royals? They would be in a tough spot – either show up and support it as it’s in their backyard and be seen as supporting Harry, or ignore it and look like total a-holes.

      • Just Jade says:

        I am afraid for Meghan in that Island. Hope Harry doesn’t fall for whatever it is they are trying to accomplish. I smell BM Rats all over this IG bit.

      • Christine says:

        Yeah, they are desperate for all that reflected glory.

    • Princessk says:

      I just love the way the three of them in the picture are all happy to drink from the same mug. Shows how natural they are and reminds me of how Kate recoiled in horror when Meghan wanted to use her lip gloss.

      • Celine says:

        @PRINCESSK – Only Meghan and Harry were drinking from the same mug, which is normal since they are a couple. Johnny Mercer drank from his own mug, and there are other pictures show that.

    • Shawna says:

      If the bait is truly a four-year program for veterans, Harry may have a hard time turning it down.

  2. Midnight@theOasis says:

    Weren’t there other countries interested in hosting the 2027 games? I thought South Korea and Italy were also interested. Sounds like the BM wants to create a narrative where Harry chooses a U.S. location over England so they can rant and create drama.

    • Anna says:

      I hope South Korea gets the bid, the trolling that would come from the BM vs kpop stans would be ridiculous

      • ecsmom says:

        I hope South Korea also gets the bid but because in the Netflix documentary the SK vets were so moved because in their country they felt like they had to hide and the games gave them a sense of pride and purpose. it would do wonders to help a country change perceptions of the disabled. I feel like having them there would give the biggest impact not just on the vets but the nation.

      • Anna says:

        @ECSMom – that is a much better reason, I really hope they go with South Korea especially with their military service there being mandatory

      • Christine says:

        I’m with you, I really want South Korea to get it, because there is a lot of work to do there in terms of anyone with any differences.

        Hard pass on the U.K., you all have made it VERY clear how unsafe it is for Meghan. You probably should have thought of this before you riled up all of the bigots, to the point where they are wishing death on her.

    • Lawrenceville says:

      The Invictus Foundation has its own board of directors, trusties, committees and whatnot, it is no longer up to prince Harry to accept or reject a bid. So, if Britain bids and wins, the games will return to the UK regardless of what prince Harry might or might not want.
      But having said that, prince Harry loves his fellow British vets and would never refuse them a chance to shine if this was meant for them. I don’t know how many vets are wanting and are supporting IG coming back to the UK but I suppose this bid is supported by many of them. They not only love IG and what they have done for them but they love and respect the man behind the creation of Invictus Games and I believe the feeling is mutual. If bringing IG back to Britain means so much to the British vets, prince Harry would put aside all animosity between him and his shitty family and support the bid.

      • Kingston says:

        Britain has proven that it does not have the capacity or the will to ensure the safety of Harry’s family.

        And by that I dont just mean ensuring that theres no mercenaries sent directly to harm H and especially M and their children by those who have declared themselves enemies of M and their kids and who have expressed their desire to see them dead, including enemies in the british shitmedia, the Met police and the royal institution.

        Lets just say it as it is.

        I am therefore sure that this will be a major consideration that H will make sure the board gets.

        A main feature of the games held everywhere else in the world: canada, australia, the netherlands, dusseldof, has been the tier 1-level security and red carpet that have been rolled out for H&M and the entire games in general, such that they could walk freely and without fear, within crowds.

        They cant have that in the UK, given that H is in the courts fighting for that very security for his family.

    • Cessily says:

      Anyplace would be better. I can’t imagine subjecting veterans who suffer from ptsd to that hateful country that is run by the press that literally target anyone near the Sussex’s. I know it’s their foundation and choice but I can’t support a return to Britain. The bashing leading up to the games will be traumatizing alone I can’t imagine how horrific the British media would make the actual games. Just the thought that they are considering it is upsetting.

  3. SussexWatcher says:

    I don’t know if I’m just not reading clearly enough but why is there a church service to celebrate the tenth anniversary? And why would Harry need to return for that? This reads like wishful thinking on someone’s part.

    And please, for the love of Sussex safety, do not hold the next Invictus Games in the UK. I sincerely believe neither Meghan or Harry would be safe there. They also just do not deserve it after completely blanking the veterans during the Dusseldorf games. The article says the royal family support Invictus? Lies. Not one of them expressed any support for the UK competitors!

    • Lawrenceville says:

      Contrary to what the BM wants people to believe, there is actually a lot of love and respect for the Sussexes in Britain. And not all the UK blanked the vets at Düsseldorf, it was just the miserable royal family and their minions. Personally, I believe if the Sussexes were to return to the UK for IG, they will be protected.

      • Kingston says:

        @Lawrenceville

        It may be true that, by and large, the citizenry love and respect H&M. HOWEVER, elements in the state apparatus – including the government, the Met Police, the media and the royal institution – have shdemonstrated that they present a clear and present danger to Prince Harry’s family.

        FGS!!! there are elements within each of the named institutions that have SAID that Harry’s wife and their children are A THREAT to the royal family!!!!! and that they should be murdered!!!!!

        And the citizenry is too cowed to come out and say, in numbers that cannot be ignored, that this is unacceptable.

        None of this can be taken lightly.

      • Celine says:

        If there are many Britons who actually adore Meghan, Meghan wouldn’t have had such a difficult time in that country. Even Meghan said in the Netflix documentary that she was afraid of the public’s reception when she returned to the UK for the farewell tour. There’s a reason why the Sussexes now live in America.

  4. Steph says:

    This sounds like a warning shot to the left overs. The govt might have a different agenda than the BRF and BM.

    • Lawrenceville says:

      This is what I think too, there’s been a shift. I believe the royals are being put on notice that moving forward, the British government and the vet affairs and all the community surrounding the vets in the UK are moving on and away from “let’s all collectively support the royals in their hatred for the Sussexes regardless of whether it benefits us or not” to “each person for themselves. You royals do you and will over here will now do what we believe benefits us whether you like it or not.

  5. Mary S says:

    I hope the 2026/2027 Invictus is held someplace other than the UK. Whenever the RF and its mouthpieces have had the choice of civility or hostility, they have ALWAYS chosen hostility when it comes to H&M. I shudder to think of the attacks and untenable choices they will use against H&M if the UK is selected to host the Invictus.

    • Christine says:

      All of the collective wailing and vomiting any time Meghan did anything remotely considered “formal” at the German IG should be a massive red flag. There are still derangers posting photos on social media, bashing her for thinking she had any right to be involved.

    • SpankFD says:

      A**holes. Given a choice, the BRF will default to being ruthless A**holes.

      To Lawrenceville’s point, the Invictus board is independent, but they are also subject to political pressure. KC3 “works the levers” of influence even if dootus PW can’t. So might the BRF scheme to undermine veterans —- normally a sacred cow —- just to score points (in their own minds) over H&M?

      Maybe.

  6. Magdalena says:

    I also think it’s a trap. Firstly, they are hoping that as Harry and Meghan run a TIGHT ship, if Invictus goes to the UK then there will be leaks about which hotel they are staying in, what they ate, whether the children are there, which solo events Meghan will be doing, etc. And then they will hound them to bits with their nasty hateful takes on every single thing. Remember that this was what pissed them off about the last two games? They had ZERO idea of where they stayed and where they had dinner and lunch etc., so the narratives they attempted to foist upon the public did not stick.

    Secondly, those countries provided top-notch security for them. Can we really see the UK doing the same? And could they be trusted NOT to leak any security arrangements to the UK media?

    Thirdly, there are people in the UK who, as recently as last autumn, attempted to smear the games with a series of negative headlines. I am convinced that one of the main reasons for wanting/plotting to bring the IG to the UK would be to seriously sabotage it then claim that it’s because H is unsuitable to be the face of it.

    Fourthly: the absolute NERVE of these people! After ignoring their own veterans who were representing the country and attempting to co-opt them in the smear campaign, they now want to use the games to bring publicity to salt island?

    And finally: Have they found a host country for the next Commonwealth games yet? Surely THAT would be a bigger priority for the UK. This plan did not come from Mercer. Someone, somewhere, with deep pockets, has decided that the only way to get inside information on H + M is to bring the IG to the UK. With people in the UK having insight into the planning and arrangements the stage would be set for sabotage and harassment of anyone associated with the games for at least two years. I hope the shortlist does not just have two countries on it. And I agree with Kaiser – the games should be kept well away.

    Oh – and why do they need to have a *church* service for the 10th anniversary? And why does it need to be held in the UK? They’re going to keep coming up with reason after reason to try to drag Harry back to the UK aren’t they? And then write screeching headlines about H snubbing IG and veterans if he does not turn up.

    • Gabby says:

      “Someone, somewhere, with deep pockets, has decided that the only way to get inside information on H + M is to bring the IG to the UK.”

      Lord Rothermere? The Murdochs? Bloomberg? Round up the usual suspects.

  7. Chantal1 says:

    Definitely a trap. Esp after alternating between ignoring IG and bashing it and everyone surrounding it for the past several years. They are desperate to get the Sussexes and esp Meghan back on UK soil for a longer period of time. Harry’s microwave appearances have traumatized them and their bs narratives.

    Now, all of a sudden, they want to host the games. But if they are seriously bidding for it, they’d better get and keep the hateful and ignorant BM in check. Publicizing wet dreams of obliterating and dismembering the founder of the IG and his wife by the RRs is terrible PR, hate speech, terrorist level threats and raises serious security issues for everyone who attends. Esp bc most countries send various delegations and high ranking military officials to these events. They’re also going to have to deal with the LED prince who won’t be able to restrain himself or control his jealousy of his more accomplished brother. Hopefully other countries are also bidding and that info becomes public soon bc this UK vs US narrative they’re trying to set up is troubling.

  8. Cynner says:

    Can you imagine the gleeful stories about how the Meghan and Harry cannot stay in royal housing and the rehashing of all the awful things they’ve been subjected to? Painting the Sussexes as the perpetrators of their own victim hood. Never realizing how the awful treatment of this lovely family makes the BM look like the narcissistic a$$holes they are.

    • Christine says:

      Or the opposite, they will claim the ONLY safe place for Harry and Meghan to stay is some royal property or another, thus trapping them with all of the people who leak endlessly.

  9. Jais says:

    Harry’s visits to the uk have been very short. He has said he does not feel safe there. Going to a one day anniversary event is not the same as a weeks long event. Until the security case with RAVEC is concluded, this bid is wishful thinking. Add to that, the fact that the uk tabloids would set a nasty tone to the games, even if Harry had proper security, I just can’t see it happening. The participants don’t want to be in a country where the papers are writing negative stories about the games. It’s actually a mental health issue for all involved.

    • Tina says:

      And even if they did choose the UK (they won’t) Meghan would not go. And Harry might not stay the full week. This makes no sense at all. They just know that there’s going to be worldwide attention this week on the IG kick off and want to tie themselves to it. The only times that I’ve seen the King and other royals mentioned here in Canada in the last few years are the a) Queens death/funeral b) Coronation and c) the recent illnesses. They are complete non-entities here and we are a Commonwealth country.

      • Celine says:

        How do you know that Meghan won’t go? Do you mean Meghan will never set foot in the UK? If so, then why would Harry waste his time fighting for the security of his family in the UK if Meghan doesn’t want to go? Also, we are talking about an event after THREE years. No one knows what will happen during these three years. Just as no one expected in 2018 that the Sussexes would step back as senior royals in 2020.

      • Christine says:

        It’s been 7 years of relentless, daily media attacks on them. Four years since they left, so I have zero hope anything will have changed three years from now.

      • Tina says:

        @Celine this is just my two cents but I don’t think Meghan would go back. At least not for a long period maybe she would fly in for WellChild or something but she’s not staying for a long period like for the funeral. Nothing has changed in fact its gotten worse since QE2 died and it will get even worse under William. I think that Harry has fought for his security for the same reason he is fighting the tabloids and the same reason he wrote Spare. He is a big believer in a) tell his story and b) showing how these really toxic and rotten institutions work. The story from Diana’s time was that she refused security. Is that true? We don’t know but Harry has made sure in black and white legal papers that he did not. Just like he’s made it clear in legal documents how the tabloids and the palaces work together. He said in one of his interviews that history is told by the victors. In his case thats the palaces and the papers as they have always had the power to tell his story. But now people will always have his side told both through his book but through his legal fights. Just my thoughts….obviously I don’t know these people and they will do what they feel is right for them. But the hysteria and the desperation from that island is off the charts. Everytime I think they have hit rock bottom it gets worse.

  10. Tina says:

    This is just wishful thinking on the UK’s part and trying to tie Harry and Meghan back to that country. IG will not pick the UK. It isn’t safe for them and there is no upside for the Foundation. The press would not be able to stop themselves from smearing the Sussexes and completely distracting from the Games.

  11. s808 says:

    I also hope UK doesn’t get the bid. It’d be a nightmare from a security and PR standpoint. My “vote” is for South Korea. Haven’t they hosted the Olympics? They should have the infrastructure needed already. No need to go back to the UK when new countries are placing bids.

  12. Amy Bee says:

    The next invictus games would be in 2027 as it’s now being held every 2 years. As for the UK bid, the Tories are probably going to be booted out by the end of this year. Is the Starmer Government going to support this venture given that Labour pledges not to spend money on anything? Plus this bid is probably a ploy by the press and Tories to try to get Harry back in the UK for more than 24 hours.

    • Robert Phillips says:

      What I would like to know. Is if anything Harry & Charles talked about last week would impact any decision IG has. Like If Charles is trying to dump William somehow. Would Harry again try to use the games to cover for them.

  13. L says:

    Also, one objective of IG is to have games on all continents. Harry said so in some interview so South Korea would be a great choice

  14. Nanea says:

    The delulu Derangers are already gleefully champing at the bit just thinking how close they could get to H&M.

    We were in Düsseldorf for a few days last year, and it seemed so relaxed, with people happily sharing successes while consoling those who did not win. (they are not using ‘lose’ because for the participants it’s considered a win to be well enough to be chosen to go)

    We did notice security around H&M, in some situations more tightly than in others, but I can’t imagine what kind of nightmare it would be to have to deal with the rabid anti-Sussexers and the evil, toxic British media – and Bulliam the Incandescent and his “friends” spilling to the likes of Tom Sykes, or the Moron and others like him openly inciting hatred and threatening the lives not only of H&M, but indirectly of anyone there.

  15. YeahRight says:

    Until they get proper security and the press prove they can behave the UK doesn’t deserve the 2027 bid. Why not give the bid to his new home country.

  16. tamsin says:

    The BM is saying that Harry is not opposed to appearing for a church service. i assume its to celebrate their own veterans. Are they inviting the whole Invictus family? The church service is very British- they are trying to reclaim Invictus. Especially if Charles attends- and Harry has to give precedence to the king. Their bid for the next games is a bit of Johnny come lately. I think Korea and Italy made their intentions known right after the Invictus Games. I join everyone who is opposed to a UK Invictus. The BM and Windsors would make a complete circus and take focus away from the competitors and purpose of the Games. The current Windsors contaminate everything they touch. They are bad karma. After ignoring their own veterans and the last two Games, they have their nerve. The BM and the Windsors are two big reasons why Invictus should not be held in the UK. I think one of the big factors in Canada’s favour was because of the inclusion of winter sports and Vancouver Whistler is already set up for it. After two Games in Europe, and a return to North America in 2025, Invictus should burnish it’s international credentials by going to another continent. Invictus is not British- it’s international. If Covid had not happened and the UK had supported its veterans, having the Games in the UK for its tenth anniversary would have been great! The petty and childish behaviour on the part of the royal family and the government is really hard to believe.

    • Christine says:

      If I’m remembering correctly, South Korea said they were going to bid while the Dusseldorf games were ongoing.

  17. Eurydice says:

    I don’t think Harry and the foundation will let personal issues get in the way of what’s best for the Games. If choosing the UK will produce a better Games, they’ll do that. But, if they want the mission to go more global, I think they should choose a venue not in Europe or North America. There are other parts of the world that also need focus on veterans’ and disability issues.

    • Moniquep says:

      But it’s not a matter of personal feelings. There is no way that the RR, RF, BM and the cadre or deranged haters won’t use the opportunity to denigrate IG in the effort to hurt Harry. They couldn’t even let up for 10 days to mourn their supposed beloved QE11. They are so blinded by their hatred for Meghan, that nothing else matters in their pursuit of trashing 2 people who have done nothing but try to help improve the lives others.

      • Eurydice says:

        I don’t think so, because Charles and Camilla will want their big ugly faces to be front and center of anything like this in the UK. And, if they approve, the RR will approve. Those who persist in trashing H&M will continue to do so, no matter where the Games are held.

        In any case, I still think the IG should be more international.

  18. LadyE says:

    I don’t see this happening because the RF would have to go on the record multiple times praising Harry and IG without any wink wink insults peppered in. And they simply can’t do that with their relationship with the tabloids. “A source said the King is very proud of Harry” with multiple “palace sources” bashing Harry at the same time is not going to work at all and they know this. IG has ceremonies with public remarks and KC and other Royals would have to actually speak in public instead of hiding behind their bs sources. If its a trap for anyone it is the Royal Family in my view. Any petulance, any disrespect, allowing the tabloids to attack Harry or Meghan and remaining silent as their usual MO during IG would be a huge international incident and show that the Royal Family is not “fit for purpose” to represent the UK and British people.

  19. Wisdom45 says:

    Until you do right by Harry and Meghan nothing you touch will go right. With the King suffering from cancer and William and his wife suffering from who knows. They are hard pressed to have a feel good story coming out or the UK.

  20. Suzan says:

    My prediction: Harry will go to the UK in May to attend the tenth anniversary of the Invictus Games. He will bring with him Meghan and the children to meet their grandfather, King Charles. I know people will now cry over my prediction, but both Meghan and Harry have said that they will raise their children to know their royal heritage, and Harry said in the Oprah interview the reconciliation with his father is one of his priorities. At some point, he wants his children to meet their grandfather.

    • Moniquep says:

      Take a look at what just occurred last week when Harry visited his “darling Pa ” and you have your answer.

      • Suzan says:

        For me, Harry’s visit last week was a hint of reconciliation between them. He literally flew from continent to another continent just to visit Charles and that’s saying a lot. I find it normal that he didn’t take the children to visit his father, especially since Charles was suddenly diagnosed with cancer and the children are now in daycare/ school and have their own routine. But by May I think things will settle down and Harry will bring his family to visit his father. I truly believe that 2024 will not end until the Sussexes have reunited with Charles. Time will tell.

    • LauraD says:

      @Suzan – Unless the issues with security are sorted out there’s not a snowball’s chance in hell Harry would risk bringing Meghan and the children to the UK. There’s also the problem of where they would stay. It’s one thing Harry evading the press but, a family consisting of two pre-schoolers will be nigh on impossible. Then there’s the problem of William throwing untold number of tantrums until he knows exactly where they’re staying so his henchmen can leak their whereabouts to the press. The only way your prediction will come true is if KCIII pulls out all the stops and going on his past behaviour I won’t be holding my breath.

      • Christine says:

        Can you imagine if Willnot is king by the? Absolute nightmare scenario.

      • BeanieBean says:

        I don’t understand how people can look at how the BRF & tabloids & etc. have treated Harry & Meghan and their kids these last several years & still think there’s going to be some weepy, Lifetime movie reconciliation. It ain’t gonna happen, people!

  21. Lulu says:

    IDK, I’m wondering if there are power players in the UK gov’t who are sick and tired of the rf and rr games. This might be someone letting the rf know they made a huge mistake driving Harry and Meghan out of the country and delivering nothing but flop tours. I do not think this is an olive branch or any nonsense about Harry returning as a working royal. Just the gov’t making an end run around the rf to recapture a little of the Sussex superstar magic.

    • sevenblue says:

      The Tories are dependent on the tabloids. It is the tabloids’ desire to bring them to UK, so they can make some money on the photos and the made up stories they are gonna write. I am guessing, there will be hundreds of articles about RF will or won’t attend the ceremony and how H&M got snubbed.

  22. Mary Pester says:

    OK, you all know I’m a veteran, you all know I have met Harry a couple of times, but I have also met JJ, who is a VERY close friend of Harry’s, so I’m a bit worried if they are trying to co-opt JJ into all this.
    My take is, the church service I can understand as it will bring back to Harry the memories of happier times with his gran. That famous skit with the Obama’s and the Queen was a joy to behold, and the closeness between Harry and the Queen was so obvious, Harry always made her smile.
    No, no invictus in the UK! Harry it’s a high Jack, don’t do it. You know willy has wanted to grab it for years, now your biggest champion, your nan has gone, he is trying to come again, they already have the RBL knee deep in it, and look at who not only the commander in Cheif is, but also the head of the RBL! Then we have the sleazy politicians becoming involved, even mercer has just had to repay funds!
    If they now want to start taking an interest fine, put their money where their glory hunting is, turn up in whistler, turn up in either Washington or south Korea and maybe then and only then, should Harry and the invictus team consider Birmingham but KEEP BILLY and your father WELL AWAY from it

    • Lawrenceville says:

      @Mary Pester, if Charles truly has cancer, I doubt he will be around in 2027. I’m truly very doubtful he’ll last for another 2 years. And I strongly believe William did something to his wife and I think he’ll be in jail in 2027.

      • Cessily says:

        Even if Peggy was guilty he is never going to jail or going to be tried. He is literally above the laws of that nation and will still be crowned unless they abolish the monarchy or force his abdication which would be highly unlikely.
        As for Peggy being crowned that is another very good reason for the games to not be there.

    • BeanieBean says:

      Yes! Let’s see if they show an interested in Whistler. You can’t ignore Invictus all this time & then say, we love vets! Bring the games here!

  23. Izzy says:

    Mercer’s comments are nice, but I still hope the games don’t go back to the UK. And that statement about the royals being supportive of it is BS, they couldn’t even put their petty grudges aside to congratulate – or even acknowledge – their war veterans.

  24. bisynaptic says:

    …In a church?

  25. Advisor2U says:

    I really hope that Prince Harry doesn’t fall into the obvious trap of this bid, but I fear that (members of) the British-based Invictus Foundation Board, or the members of the committee that selects the next organising country, will fall into it will, get blackmailed or bribed with royal titles/honours. Sorry guys, but I don’t trust the class and royal-subservient Brits. Many are hungry for any proximity to the royal family, and will tend to fall for any offer or pressure from the royal courts.

    • Advisor2U says:

      And why a service for a ten year anniversary!!. Jeeez! That sounds like British stiff and boringness. I hope the IG Foundation / Games comes up with a better idea.
      Why not something festive like a ticketed pop concert, or a fundraising Gala and reception?

      • anon says:

        Yah a church service is so boring and so British. I’ve been hoping for a coffee table book with photos of the athletes competing from the last 10 years with their inspiring stories. That would be a great fundraiser. I was very moved by Heart of Invictus and watched the 2023 Games for the first time.

  26. BlueNailsBetty says:

    “… and we understand that the Games have always had the support of the rest of the royal family.”

    OH REALLY?!? Please show us any evidence the royal family supported Invictus or the British competitors last year. I’ll wait…

  27. Lulu says:

    So William, you want to go take a loooong leave of absence? Go right ahead, no worries we’ll just bid for IG to come back to the UK, we’ve got it handled.

  28. LynnInTx says:

    Can we talk about this bit?
    “If Birmingham beats its US rival bidder of Washington, it will bring Harry and Meghan back to the UK together for the first time since the late Queen’s funeral in September 2022.”

    Are the rota/media actually admitting M won’t set foot in the UK until 2027 at the earliest?! And that’s only if Invictus goes to Birmingham? Gee I wonder why that is? Could it be years of absolutely unhinged wall-to-wall press harassment and death threats? They (BRF/media/rota) really shot themselves in the foot didn’t they?

  29. Saucy&Sassy says:

    Well, chickens are coming home to roost. Let’s see, years and years of leaks and stories engendering hate and vitriol against the Sussexes. A printed article that said Meghan should be stripped and paraded naked in the streets so that the populace could throw excrement at her. One person saying in an interview that the Sussexes should be obliterated. Another person on a rant that Harry should be torn limb from limb. Not once did the brf or government call any of this out. Not once. Indeed, their silence seems to indicate complicity.

    There is no way to put that cork back into the bottle assuming anyone wanted to, which I’m not convinced they do. Even if there was appropriate security for the Sussex family, I don’t know if they would be safe. There are too many crazies who will want to respond to the call to action. That’s what this is about. They wanted them hated and reviled. It doesn’t matter that not everyone feels that way–there are plenty that do.

    I have no idea why the UK wants to put a bid in for IG when they’ve made it clear that they want nothing to do with IG or the Vets who are part of it. I suspect someone wants pictures of the Sussex kids and figure this is a way to do that. I, personally, would have problems trusting the Met police, since their racist texts were publicized. I doubt they got all of the people who are racist at the Met.

    As I understand it, one of the leading reasons for Brexit was because of immigration. Does anyone think that those who are opposed to immigrants will WELCOME people from all over the world? Does anyone think they would be treated with respect? I’ve got another leg, you can pull that one, too.

    Why is Washington being used here? Seattle, Washington put a bid in for the 2025 IG. Obviously, Canada was chosen. Italy and South Korea were vocal in wanting to put a bid in for 2027. South Korea would be a great choice because I keep coming back to the fact that the Vet in Heart of Invictus stated that people with disabilities did NOT go out in public. He chose to do so to try to change the narrative. He wanted to win a medal so that his daughter could be proud of him. I think South Korea would be a really great choice.

    • kirk says:

      Actually, the UK government prosecuted and sentenced two ‘neo-Nazi’ podcasters, Christopher Gibbons and Tyrone Patten-Walsh, to a combined 15-year prison term for saying the Duke of Sussex should be killed for treason, and that his son, the “creature,” Archie “should be put down.” Neil Basu, the former head of counter-terrorism policing in UK, said in a Channel 4 interview that the Duchess of Sussex received “disgusting and very real threats” while still a working royal. However, you are correct in pointing out that Harry’s royal birth family ‘Firm’ has been silent about very real threats to Harry and his chosen family.

      Invictus Games Foundation would be derelict in their duty to the organization if they were to disregard the safety, security, and income generating potential of Harry and Meghan in selecting the next site. The UK Cabinet Office team that would like to create a 4-year rehabilitation program could do so without Invictus. The US DoD Warrior Games (which inspired Harry to create Invictus Games) is still conducted annually in US, after taking a COVID-19 break in 2020 and 2021.

      • Saucy&Sassy says:

        Kirk, there’s so much that’s been done to the Sussexes. I totally agree that the UK can create a four-year program for the Vets. The Warrior Games have been in the US since 2010 and still going strong. It is separate from IG, but some of the Vets who participate in IG come through the Warrior Games–not all of them.

        I do think the bm and brf have worked together, but I don’t think we should ignore the UK government. You notice they haven’t said a word about the public death threats. The dynamic between these entities feels very smarmy.

  30. Shoegirl77 says:

    Everyone here talking about this like all the left behinds are all going to be still alive in 27. Anyway, let’s go Invictus. To anywhere but the UK.

  31. VilleRose says:

    I’m a bit confused why there would be a church service for the 10th anniversary? Invictus Games is not a religious organization by any means. I could understand there are athletes from all faiths and all walks of life but a 10th anniversary service in a church seems like a weird way to commemorate the anniversary. I could understand a secular ceremony somewhere? I think that’s my biggest confusion in this story.