Like Wendy’s, Coke tried dynamic pricing but got backlash


Last week, Wendy’s set off a bit of a social media sh–tstorm when it confirmed that, beginning in 2025 they would be testing out a dynamic pricing model. The dynamic pricing module is what Uber follows, with surge pricing going into effect based on demand, time of day, or location. Naturally, everyone dragged the hell outta their greedy corporate asses. Wendy’s quickly backtracked, claiming that they were planning on using the ”other” definition of dynamic pricing! You know, the one where companies charge customers less money during off-hours, not more money during busier hours. Silly us for not realizing they were using that lesser-known definition that companies are always known for using.

As it turns out, this isn’t the first time that a company within the food industry has had the idea to implement dynamic pricing. 25 years ago, Coca-Cola thought they could get away with a little bit of blatant price-gouging of their own. Back in 1999, Coke toyed with the idea of vending machines that would automatically raise the price of their products on hot days. Their chairman at the time even justified charging more because the demand for a cold drink goes up when the weather is hotter, literally saying, “So, it is fair that it should be more expensive.” And let’s see just how that worked out for them.

Burger chain Wendy’s is in damage-control mode following reports that it would be testing surge pricing — a mostly reviled strategy of raising prices during busy times made famous by Uber. The whole debacle seems very of-the-moment, but actually mirrors another PR crisis from 25 years ago at the Coca-Cola Company.

Back then Coke considered raising vending machine prices when the temperature rose:

  • People thirst for a cold drink on a hot day, “so it is fair that it should be more expensive,” the company’s then-chairman said.
  • People hated the idea.
  • The word “gouging” came up a lot, wrote the NYT’s David Leonhardt more than five years later. Pepsi quickly took the opportunity to say it would never do such a thing — and Coke walked it back.
  • Coke framed dynamic pricing in a way that was certain to get backlash, says Vicki Morwitz, a professor at Columbia Business School who teaches the episode as a case study.

  • The semantics make a big difference — you don’t want to highlight the idea of raising prices. The best practice is to set your highest price as a base price in an algorithm and offer discounts from there.
  • Many private colleges and universities employ this sticker-price strategy, as Ron Lieber details in his book “The Price You Pay for College” — though parents and kids trying to make choices don’t love it.
  • The bottom line: People don’t like when prices are high or seem unfair or capricious. Companies should tread carefully.

    [From Axios]

    I mean, framing it as being entitled to charge more for a cold soda simply because more people drink more cold sodas when it’s hot out is certainly a strategy, all right. And most companies do that thing where they set their base prices high to offer discounts. I feel like every single time I buy clothes at a store that isn’t Costco, my 20% off coupon is merely bringing my sweater back down to what they’d charge anyway. All together now, let’s give a collective, “Meh.”

    Also, LMAO at Pepsi for taking advantage of that to troll their longtime rival. I wonder if they’d do that today or if they’d sit quietly and see if the strategy ends up working out so they can implement it themselves. I saw Burger King and Arizona Iced Tea had sassy Tweets about Wendy’s controversy. Burger King also offered free Whoppers to taunt Wendy’s, too. It would have been hilarious if more companies’ social media accounts had gotten in on the roasting. It’s always fun watching companies gang up on other ones for terrible PR moves. Let’s call it “surge trolling.”

    photos are screenshots of Jared Leto in a 1991 Coke commercial, video above

    You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

    17 Responses to “Like Wendy’s, Coke tried dynamic pricing but got backlash”

    Comments are Closed

    We close comments on older posts to fight comment spam.

    1. Flowerlake says:

      I think every country should have charity shops like in the UK.

      -The money goes to charity
      -Things get used again instead of thrown away-> environmentally friendly
      -cheap

      • Kokiri says:

        Goodwill, Salvation Army, Various others, in Canada.
        Churches have the too, open to the public.
        Lately goodwill raised its prices. I got a brand new banana republic sweater a few years ago, $8. Brand new, tags on.

        Not only did they raise prices, but they surged brand names. So now BR stuff is at least $20.
        It’s so SO disgusting & disappointing.

        Now some of their prices are more, for used, thank Walmart, giant tiger, Costco, for new.

        Face it, poor or working poor people are blamed for their circumstances, rather than the policy failures that are truly to blame.

        • Pochorella says:

          Goodwill is such a scam. Their price increases have been outrageous in the last few years (the prices are getting close to ebay prices at this point). I literally see dollar store crap priced at 4 or 5 dollars, and as Kokiri mentioned, Walmart brands selling for more used than they cost brand new at Wally World. Also, their “charitable contribution” is “creating jobs in the community”, which anybody could do with a bunch of free stuff to mark up and sell.

          They’re pulling in a fucking fortune and probably don’t even pay taxes on it. I feel terrible for families that are reliant on Goodwill for clothing their families.

        • equality says:

          @Pochorella Agree about Goodwill. It actually cracks me up when they have the original price still on the packaging and the Goodwill price is more. I guess, they are like some stores and price upward so that when they do their half-off times, it seems like a bargain.

        • Blithe says:

          Goodwill used to have some great finds. Now they try to pull a lot of the better quality stuff that’s been donated, and, instead of selling it through the local stores, they sell it online to the highest bidders — so people who shop at the stores won’t have access to unexpectedly nice, low priced options. I’ve been donating to local places instead — church run thrift shops, nursing homes, etc — instead.

      • equality says:

        There are plenty of those in the US also. Most of my friends/relatives use them. I haven’t bought newly made clothes in a while.

      • JRT says:

        I choose to donate to WINS in Canada which stands for ‘Women in Need Society.’ Rather give my gently used items to benefit women in need in my city. I would suggest more Canadians research alternate charity shops in their local areas.

    2. Jules57 says:

      This happens every day depending on where a product is sold. It’s not new. Buy x here and it costs a, buy it there and it costs y. It’s the exact same thing

      • SarahCS says:

        This is why I walk to the larger version of the supermarket that’s 25 minutes from my home when i can get the same thing in the ‘local’ version that’s 2 minutes away, I’ve checked and things cost more in the local one.

    3. equality says:

      People do put up with this. Hotels do it based on when certain industries are having conventions. Sit down restaurants do it based on time of day or weekday/weekend. If you get something extra for the money then okay, but if it is the exact same thing for the higher price, I nope out.

      • tealily says:

        People put up with it when there are no other options. If Wendy’s is surge pricing, I’ll just go to Burger King.

    4. Stephanie says:

      Charging less in off hours and more during busy is still surge pricing, Wendy’s!

    5. The Hench says:

      The irony is that busy times at restaurants already make you pay a price – queuing, longer waits for a table, potentially slower service, noise and crowding. To hike the cost too is just rubbing salt into the wound.

    6. Whatnow says:

      Public transportation MTA NYC– you get the senior/ disabled fare off peak from 9:00 to 3:00. Anytime before or after that is peak travel time and you pay full price. You don’t get the discount again until I believe after 7:00 in the evening.

    7. Cheshire Sass says:

      What I love (sarcasm) about this dynamic pricing process is companies deciding, because they choose to be under staffed for profit during their busiest periods (lunch, dinner) that the customer should be willing to put up with terrible long wait service and pay more for it – It’s just hilarious. I wonder where the Wendy’s PR twitter kid with the snappy (truly funny) comebacks is for this one.

    8. SpankyB says:

      In the era of discount shopping everyone needs to feel as though they’re getting a deal, even if they’re not. My business has a website, we charge for shipping. We also sell on Ebay and Amazon where we have free shipping. With all of the fees associated with ebay and Amazon, plus paying for shipping, we have to hike up the prices to make a profit. People don’t care, as long as they see “free shipping” they think they’re getting a deal. And I will always purchase from someone’s website before purchasing from ebay/amazon, especially small businesses, just so that company can make a bigger profit, I’m fine paying for shipping.

    9. tealily says:

      It’s a shame because I don’t really eat much fast food, but I really do love a Wendy’s burger from time to time. Now I will just stop eating there.