Prince Andrew views Royal Lodge as ‘his children’s inheritance,’ he’s not moving out

Last weekend, there was yet another convenient deflection to the situation with Prince Andrew and his lease on Royal Lodge. Royal Lodge is a 30-room mansion on the Royal Windsor estate, and Andrew is only two decades into a 75-year “sweetheart deal” lease on the crown property. For years now, King Charles and Prince William have been publicly badgering Andrew to relinquish his lease so that William and his family can move into Royal Lodge. I don’t even believe that Charles cares that much, but William is on the warpath about it, and Charles mostly just wants Andrew to be less visible. Well, last weekend’s story was that Charles was considering cutting off Andrew’s funding. Charles uses Duchy of Lancaster funds to finance Andrew’s security bills and his general living expenses, at the cost of something like $5 million a year. I wrote about what I think is really going on here – Andrew wants to be bought out of his lease and Charles has balked at his terms. Something to keep in mind as you read these highlights from the Daily Beast’s latest exclusive.

Andrew will not move out, despite Charles’s threats: One friend said: “Andrew has no intention of moving out, and it’s extraordinary that his brother has chosen to reopen this battle via anonymous briefings to the press. It’s like they [the Palace] have learned nothing from the whole Harry and Meghan debacle. Andrew does not have a huge amount in his life any more, the house is one of the few things keeping him going, and the idea that he is going to throw that away along with his children’s inheritance is just absurd. The place is perfectly well maintained and the notion that Andrew is in dire financial straits is not remotely accurate. He still has the support of plenty of friends and has plenty of business interests.”

Royal Lodge is Andrew’s forever home: Another friend said: “He was given the lease on the house on favorable terms by the late queen. He has been living there with his family for the past twenty years. It is his forever home and he won’t be leaving. Charles has more than enough houses to go round, and should drop this distracting argument with his brother. I find it hard to believe many people in the U.K. would give the issue a second thought if Charles’ camp stopped running these cruel eviction plans up the flagpole every few months.”

Sarah Ferguson supports Andrew’s decision to remain at Royal Lodge: “Sarah has never sought to rock the boat. She has said very publicly that she is grateful to have been brought back into the family by the late queen and she is of course very grateful that has carried on under Charles. That’s a different thing to selling out her family,” the friend said, “She is fiercely loyal to Andrew.” Asked if her double cancer diagnosis last year had affected her position, the friend said, “Not really because her position has always been that Royal Lodge is the family home. That hasn’t changed.”

Historian Andrew Lownie’s take on the situation: “It’s very clear that Charles is now completely fed up with him and would very much like him to move to Frogmore Cottage, but it all still comes down to the fact that Andrew has the lease. That means there is not much anyone can do. There is evidence that work is going on there, and sure, some of it should have been started last year, but that is hardly going to be grounds to evict him. He has plenty of money. He sold his Swiss chalet, he continues to go out to the Middle East for work, and he inherited money from his grandmother. Sarah Ferguson bought a £5m ($6.4m) property in Mayfair in 2022. The whole dispute really stems from the fact that that the brothers have never got on, and the households don’t get on either. No-one is coming out of this very well, but if Charles is really serious about getting rid of him, he should stop paying for his security—but the problem there is that Andrew is the one royal who perhaps needs it more than any other.”

[From The Daily Beast]

This is what I keep saying too: “Charles has more than enough houses to go round.” Charles currently splits his time between seven homes, right? Buckingham Palace, Clarence House, Highgrove, Balmoral, Birkhall, Sandringham, Windsor Castle, and I’m not even counting the royal properties where he only stays for a day or two every year, like Holyrood Palace. Beyond those homes, there is a vast network of crown properties. These people are acting like Royal Lodge and Frogmore Cottage are the only homes up for debate. It’s insane. Like, I’m not even on Andrew’s side or Charles’s side – they’re both despicable people. But I totally understand why Andrew is playing hardball here and why he’s disgusted with Charles and William’s bonkers eviction campaign.

Photos courtesy of Avalon Red, Cover Images.

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

65 Responses to “Prince Andrew views Royal Lodge as ‘his children’s inheritance,’ he’s not moving out”

Comments are Closed

We close comments on older posts to fight comment spam.

  1. bb says:

    do his children even want it?

    • Talia says:

      If they can sublet, the lease is likely to be worth tens of millions. I don’t know if they can but that would normally be possible on a long lease. They don’t have to want to live there to be OK with inheriting a multi million pound asset.

      • Libra says:

        A sublet might be the only way they can afford to keep Royal Lodge. It must be terribly expensive to maintain, even with costs split between the two girls. By the time Andrew passes, the grandchildren will be grown and away at school. Perhaps one or both girls will be divorced. Royal Lodge may turn out to be an albatross that neither one wants.

    • OliviaOne says:

      Everything within the crown is not subject to normal laws and conventions.
      Once Pedo is dead, it doesn’t matter what they know about CHarlie and the rest. They are not getting a thing.

      • Mrs.Krabapple says:

        I’m pretty sure Andrew has the dirt on Charles. His kids can keep royal lodge if he also has dirt on William that he passes down to them. We’ll have to wait and see.

  2. Tessa says:

    Sarah is still divorced from Andrew. The queen did not bring her back into the family. She did not even get invited to Williams wedding . Charles is going to leave Andrew alone.

    • Barb Mill says:

      I thought once Phillip died Sarah was invited to Balmoral again and a few other events.

  3. Leena says:

    If it’s a lease, how can his children inherit it? 🙄

    • Talia says:

      In the UK long leases are the way some properties (like flats) are owned. They can absolutely be inherited.

    • Tina says:

      Its a 75 year lease and can be passed to direct family members so the girls could have it for the majority of their lives as there is 50ish years left on it. Not sure if Bea and Eugenie would want it but the rent is (I believe) $250 a week which is pretty sweet for a mansion. The upkeep costs would be enormous though.

  4. Scout says:

    So why does William want it? What are the advantages versus other available properties?

    • Wagiman says:

      It’s big, it’s private and he and Kate can still pretend to live together.

    • ML says:

      Look. I’m sure W wants this property, but PA showing up in the Daily Beast, a site with a strong William-sourced writer, screams to me that William is desperate to change the missing Kate narrative.

    • Lizzie Bennett says:

      If PA can’t afford the upkeep of RL and the repairs needed are as extensive/expensive as they say wouldn’t it be a slap in the face to Bea and Eugenie to inherit an estate that’d cost a fortune to fix? What’s so special about RL and FC? Surely there are tons of huge estates on royal grounds or in particular Windsor that William and PA could choose from and no need to force H&M old home on anyone. If William moves into RL would the tax payers be paying for its renovations?

      • Saucy&Sassy says:

        Lizzie Bennett, we don’t know if QE2 made sure that there would be money to keep RL maintained. It wouldn’t surprise me.

  5. Chica says:

    What work is Andrew doing in the Middle East?

    • Monika says:

      That was my first thought as well. He is working in the Middle East? Interesting! What is his job?

      • Tina says:

        Nothing good I’d imagine. The line about “plenty of friends” and “doing work in the Middle East” made me laugh out loud. I read that as a giant threat from Andrew’s camp that he can still do plenty of embarrassing things for money if he’s forced to.

      • ljnd says:

        Andrew Lownie is no friend of Andrew’s – he’s writing a biography of him and Sarah, and from interviews and his podcast, it’s quite clear that the bio is going to be full of skullduggery. Lownie is no Sussex fan (he’s Lady Colin Campbell’s literary agent, which would have put me off his podcast permanently, but he shares the pod with Phil Davis, who is pro-Sussex, so I just skip the episodes I don’t like), but he’s also not a pushover, and I find it difficult to believe he’s parroting Andrew’s or even William’s talking points.

    • sevenblue says:

      Oh no need to get into that. We have info on how H&M water their grass, but the royal reporters are not interested in any info on Andrew’s activities.

      • MsIam says:

        Maybe he’s Charlie’s money bags smuggler and a few euros or pounds manage to fall out and into Andy’s pockets? Or maybe he’s making milk commercials? At any rate whatever he’s doing probably won’t pass the smell test. Seems like all of the York’s are prone to running off to the Middle East for some reason or another. Interesting.

    • equality says:

      Maybe he fetches bags of cash for Charles.

    • OliviaOne says:

      Last I read both him and Edward sell military guns and equipment.. small things, like fighter jets and drones etc..

    • Mila says:

      Something charitable, I’m sure.

      /s

    • Thena says:

      Andrew has always had sketchy friends in the oil business who could provide suitcases full of cash…

  6. amy says:

    Harry had a lease for Frogmore Cottage and that didn’t seem to do him much good. How is this any different?

    • agirlandherdogs says:

      This is what I’m wondering. What mental gymnastics are they doing to make this situation different?

    • Talia says:

      Different sort of lease. H&M had a normal rental contract – Andrew has a long lease. The rules for breaking each are very different.

    • Jan90067 says:

      Harry was not given a “lifetime” lease. That’s the difference. It was a year to year, or perhaps up every 3-5 yrs.

      Frankly, I don’t know why Bad Betty didn’t *actually* GIFT him a house, free and clear, as she did Anne (and Willie), or give him the lifetime/80 yr lease, as she did for Pedo and Eddie.

      • KT says:

        I think that was Charles, really. He was already de-facto regent by that stage. He has always been tight. Any ‘private funds’ involved in the renovation would have come from him, and he was the one saying there was no money for Meg.

      • Well Wisher says:

        The funds were already designated within the budget for structural repairs at Frogmore Cottage, after Harry left there were a lot of braying in the media about them no longer being working royals , so the Sussexes repaid the amount and had a new lease agreement with the Queen.
        His father did not honour the agreement, he should have repaid the money.

  7. Laura D says:

    Wow father wants to make sure his children aren’t homeless if anything should happen to him. This type of concern is alien to the king.

  8. Lau says:

    “Charles mostly just wants Andrew to be less visible” so he just let him lead public family events ?

    • Amy Bee says:

      Yeah, Charles has no problem with Andrew being visible at family events. Charles just wants Andrew to give up Royal Lodge so he doesn’t have to spend so much money on him.

  9. Olivia says:

    I actually think this is William passively aggressively trying to bully and corner Andrew, because William wants the whole of the Windsor estate.

    This tactic is exactly what he did with Kate for two years about homes and schools while they were negotiating through the press, the terms of their separation / divorce / Kate’s retirement from public life.

    And the same tricks he used with Harry when he released a forged statement from Harry saying William never bullied him.

    This reeks of William. It’s just more fake WilliLeaks.

    Remember, whatever Will wants, Charles will do the opposite – like invite Andrew (and Rosebush!) to public events to show the King supports them and not William.

    • Well Wisher says:

      Ditto…To William’s passive aggression…
      He really want to have a go at Harry, so he went or Andrew, as per usual…..

  10. TN Democrat says:

    Eton is near Windsor. Odds are George will attend Eton because his father attended (and Charles wanted to go there). Didn’t Will-not regularly spend time with the Queen at the castle and the Queen Mum at Royal Lodge during his time at Eton? This narrative may be pushed in anticipation of a future narrative with George, even though Adelaide is also on the Windsor grounds. The main purpose of this story is about having some tidbit to feed the rota and it is about linking Harry’s name to someone who actually did bad things in the press. The King/Will-not control hundreds, if not thousands, of properties.

  11. Cathy says:

    Royal Rota Rat to their insider buddy at KP: I need a story, what’s happening with Kate?
    KP: oh, look over here! Did you hear about Charles wanting Andrew out of the Royal Lodge?
    RRR changes direction and going running after the red herring
    KP: hehe
    Also KP: Kate who?

  12. Amy Bee says:

    I have no doubt that Andrew sees this house as his inheritance. Everything else went to Charles after the Queen died.

    • Barb Mill says:

      As much as Andrew is a horrible person I am with him on this one. Just to spite Charles and William makes it worth it. He can cause them more problems than him just getting evicted.

  13. Jais says:

    Ooh. Mic drop. These are fighting words. Andrew finds it extraordinary that Charles continues to make anonymous briefings to the press about this. Then asks if he hasn’t learned anything from the Harry and Meghan debacle. Holy moly. Was that Andrew just confirming that Charles was briefing against the Sussexes? Dayum. Did Andrew just confirm harry’s account of being briefed against by family members in Spare? Andrew is ready to rumble.

    • Christine says:

      Yep, this is getting good.

    • !!

      “Andrew has no intention of moving out, and it’s extraordinary that his brother has chosen to reopen this battle via anonymous briefings to the press. It’s like they [the Palace] have learned nothing from the whole Harry and Meghan debacle.”

      !!

      • GWiecz says:

        I wonder what Anne thinks about this. I head she is close to Charles, but is she also close to Andrew?

  14. blueberry says:

    “ if Charles is really serious about getting rid of him, he should stop paying for his security—but the problem there is that Andrew is the one royal who perhaps needs it more than any other.”

    Whut? Why?

  15. swaz says:

    I support Andrew in this one, don’t move Andrew 🤣🤣🤣 THE WAR OF THE ROSES!

  16. Mslove says:

    Oh, the indignity of bargaining with a pedo. This is what the Royal family has come to. Family squabbling. Chuck is picking on the pedo & Peg rages about Harry every other day. Meanwhile, the Brits ignore the royal family while simultaneously funding their lavish lifestyle. What a scam.

  17. Renae says:

    Wonder if Andy has picked out HIS burial site.

    What a family!
    These people deserve each other. It is entertaining watching these folks bite each others butts.

  18. Lindsay says:

    This stuffy hoarder just becomes more grotesque as time marches forward.
    One couldn’t write a better evil monarch villain.
    Then there’s that flamed haired sidekick of his.
    They are both detestable grifters who possess incriminating secrets that is their currency.

  19. Kt says:

    I kinda side with Andrew on this one.

    He has a lease, for a home that the Queen clearly intended to be lifelong and to be passed to his children.

    If you’re going to have a monarchy and say that the monarch’s family are special too, then you kinda need to be consistent about it. If Andrew is special enough to be given that lease for Royal Lodge by Liz, Charles should honour it. As he should have honoured the clearly intended gift of a home for the Sussexes and their family.

    No backsies.

  20. Pam says:

    What’s so irritating is that law-abiding, decent people like the Sussexes had their residence and security snatched away, because they aren’t “working royals.” Andrew, with whom I’m sure the FBI would like a word, gets to keep all his stuff, even though he’s (checks notes) NOT a working royal! What the hell?

    • Where'sMyTiara says:

      Andrew knows things about Charles that would bring an end to his reign, I suspect.

      The phrase “keep your friends close, and your enemies closer” is, I believe, applicable here.

      I think Andrew is prepared to write a book that would blow the whole show up if he is cut adrift. The way his brother behaves around him makes it seem like that was the threat delivered.

  21. QuiteContrary says:

    I am TeamNoOne.

    They are all terrible and entitled.

  22. Well Wisher says:

    When ever William want to have a ‘go’ on Harry, these stories appear and the Cambridges moved into Adelaide Cottage, whilst measuring the drapes for Windsor Castle, they got a hard ‘no’ from Charles.
    Andrew is being emotionally punished as a substitute for Harry, there is nothing more to take away other than ‘titles’ and burial……
    None of which will make them look good
    So…..

  23. Kim says:

    Do you suppose William is back end pressuring Charles with the high grove lease?

  24. martha says:

    I think it’s just part of Charles’ pretending to downsize and convince the public that the royal family is a good deal.

  25. sammi says:

    This is about Eugenie and Beatrice…..Katie wants their childhood home and a better house than her sister Pippa. She is the one who is holding out for this ‘promise’ which may have been the reason she agreed to move to Adelaide cottage. A fortune was paid to re-furbish Kenisington Palace on the understanding it was the Cambridges family home and Robert Johnson reported that it caused a lot of trouble when they wanted to move to Windsor…initially into the Castle which was blocked by Charlie and Cammie and the saga continues. Frogmore stands empty with no income coming in but expenses for maintence going out!

    Andrew is a shit and he will not budge unless they pay him a fortune.

  26. Oh come on. says:

    Wait, what the Hell “business” does Andrew have in the Middle East?

  27. Marni8 says:

    Just a hideous “family” by any metric. Royal should mean more than just titles. It should mean the highest integrity and best kind of values, considering the privilege and resources they’ve benefitted from.