Buckingham Palace claims they didn’t ask Boris Johnson to beg Prince Harry to stay

Boris Johnson’s memoir will be out on October 10th, and his publisher is trying to hype the book by releasing choice excerpts and previews. One of the big excerpts – the one which has gotten the most attention in the UK – is Boris Johnson writing that in January 2020, he was tasked with prevailing upon Prince Harry to stay in the UK. The timeline: BoJo became prime minister in the summer of 2019, and Harry and Meghan left the UK for a “Christmas holiday” in Canada in December 2019. By early January, they announced their intention to step away from the royal family, and by January 13th, Harry was meeting with his family and the courtiers alone at Sandringham and working out the terms of Sussexit. Then, just days later, Harry and Boris both attended the UK-Africa investment summit. Boris pulled Harry aside and they spoke alone for twenty minutes as Boris tried to convince him to stay in the UK. Boris apparently writes that the meeting was not his idea – that Buckingham Palace and Downing Street asked him to speak to Harry and make the last-ditch appeal. Now Buckingham Palace claims that they didn’t ask BoJo to do anything.

Boris Johnson was not asked by Buckingham Palace to try and persuade Prince Harry to stay in the UK, The Telegraph understands. The former prime minister claims in a new book that he was asked to give the Duke of Sussex a “manly pep talk” to convince him not to step back from his royal duties. He says that officials from Buckingham Palace and Downing Street made the request in the belief that a last-minute intervention, in January 2020, might encourage the Duke to change his mind.

In Unleashed, his memoir which will be published on Oct 10, Mr Johnson describes “a ridiculous business… when they made me try to persuade Harry to stay. Kind of manly pep talk. Totally hopeless”. The pair enjoyed an “informal” 20-minute meeting, which took place behind closed doors on the margins of a UK-Africa investment summit in London’s Docklands, on January 20, 2020.

Sources close to the Duke confirmed that the then prime minister did suggest that both he and Meghan remain in the UK.

However, sources with knowledge of such meetings at the time insisted that the Palace did not ask Mr Johnson to intervene. While it cannot be ruled out that a member of the Downing Street team suggested that it might be worth mentioning to the Duke, there was no specific formal request. By that point, all involved had realised that any attempt to persuade the Sussexes to stay would be futile. The following day, Prince Harry flew to Canada to be reunited with Meghan and their son, Archie.

The previous evening, the Duke had delivered a speech at an event for Sentebale, his charity based in Lesotho, in which he said he had “no other option” but to step back from royal life and spoke of his sadness that it had “come to this”. A week earlier, on Jan 13, the Duke had joined his grandmother, Elizabeth II, father and elder brother for the so-called Sandringham Summit, to thrash out the terms of his exit.

[From The Telegraph]

The current “Buckingham Palace” saying this is not the same as the “Buckingham Palace” in January 2020. Different courtiers, different CEO. It’s possible that QEII and her courtiers did request it, but then-Prince Charles and Clarence House did not. We know for sure that Kensington Palace didn’t request jacksh-t – they were doing the most to push Harry out and leak everything that was said during the summit. This is a beef between Charles and his dead mother about what to do about Harry – QEII clearly wanted Harry’s exit to be handled with more sensitivity, more delicacy and more warmth. But the whole point of the “hard Sussexit” was, in Charles’s mind, to force the Sussexes to capitulate and come back, broke and broken. The fact that it now looks like the monarchy asked the whole-ass prime minister to beg Harry to stay is not the image the current monarchy wants to project.

Photos courtesy of Avalon Red.

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

58 Responses to “Buckingham Palace claims they didn’t ask Boris Johnson to beg Prince Harry to stay”

Comments are Closed

We close comments on older posts to fight comment spam.

  1. Pinkosaurus says:

    I hope this turns into a petty she said-he said between the Tories and the crown. They all have so many secrets, none of which are to the benefit of the taxpayers funding them. The royals need the government leadership to keep paying them and not requiring them to meaningfully report what they are doing with it all, and the Tories need the royals to give them “prestigious” titles and well paid no-show jobs when their terms are over. Nothing but petty stupid grift.

  2. Jan says:

    If I recalled, the Queen said, “they took the dogs, they’re not coming back.
    If the Queen couldn’t get them to stay, you think racist BoJo would have any chance of changing Harry’s mind.

    • Where'sMyTiara says:

      Cluck doesn’t want this narrative to prevail because it messes with his narrative that “Harry must be punished for leaving by removing his security, his UK home, and his royal charities. Harry must be punished b/c he didn’t immediately set aside his soulmate and kids, and come crawling back on his knees to beg for scraps from the monarch’s table”.

      I mean, Mission Accomplished, King Cluck. Heckuva job, Brownie, as Dubya would say.
      All Cluck has managed to achieve is the permanent estrangement of himself and his youngest son. Harry isn’t coming back, ever, because there’s no reason to come back. There’s nothing to come back to. They’ve taken away everything they dare take away, without causing an aristo revolt in the process.

      Face it, Fred & Gladys: you have well and truly stepped in the poo. And your courtiers are flinging even more on you, every time they run to the tabloids to tattle on your behalf. You’re all covered in poo. The smear campaign doesn’t smear Meghan and Harry, palaces: IT SMEARS *YOU*.

      They won’t take H&M’s titles away, even with an act of Parliament that it requires, because then other family members might be in the line of fire to have theirs removed – and how many people does Cluck want out there, outside the tent, telling tales out of school to book publishers, so to speak? You just know Andrew & Fergs are chomping at the bit to spill the tea on Camilla, Charles, et al.

  3. equality says:

    Of course there was no “formal” request. Just like there aren’t “formal” statements to the press on some matters, just “sources”. BP does over half of its business in a sneaky, underhanded manner.

    • Eurydice says:

      Exactly, I imagine formal requests are relatively rare – they leave a paper trail.

    • Jais says:

      Yeah, I can believe someone asked Bojo to talk to Harry but it wasn’t a formal request. Mostly, it’s just funny to watch Bojo get the palace treatment of half-truths. Saying there wasn’t a formal request doesn’t mean there wasn’t some kind of request. And isn’t going to the Telegraph about this complaining and explaining? Which they claim not to do🙄

    • ML says:

      “Formal” is doing heavy lifting, but the litmus test is if BoJo’s memoire is pulled from the shelves. If BP says that this never happened, then expect an issue with publication. BoJo cannot publish this if it’s untrue. My guess is that he might have proof, because we all know how the RF reacts to news they want to suppress.

      • Mrs.Krabapple says:

        Well, since Elizabeth is now dead, it would be difficult for Charles to claim a conversation she had with Boris never happened. Because (1) how would he know what was said between two people years ago during a conversation that didnt involve him, and (2) if there were only two people in that conversation and the only surviving person says the conversation happened, how can the palace ever dispute that?

    • Jay says:

      Yes, but the order must have at least carried the weight of the palace in order for Bojo to act, right? I can’t see him going on this errand because someone in Downing Street told him to – he’s the PM, he’s not some messenger boy, even for the queen! I could see him wanting the monarch to owe him a favour, but I can’t see him giving a “pep talk” to Harry on the say so of some lowly aide ( I’m thinking particularly of the “revolving door” of palace aides who became civil servants). Bojo does not strike me as the kind of person who would do that without being absolutely sure that if he carries water for the Windsors this time, he can call on them for something later.

      • Eurydice says:

        Oh, absolutely. Johnson would have been meeting with Elizabeth every week and H&M leaving was a major crisis for the monarchy. He might not have been given an official order, but we know that royal suggestions are pretty much the same thing.

      • Proud Mary says:

        100%. He did it because he expected to leverage the errand for future favors. He’s Trump incarnate. This was purely transactional for him. That’s why he has no trouble monetizing his involvement to sell his book.

    • kirk says:

      I love this whole conversation thread. Everyone sounds incredibly astute. Sounds like Michael Cohen book where he’s comparing tRump to the Mob. No explicit instructions, but everybody understands.

    • BeanieBean says:

      They’re rather like the mafia in that way–put nothing in writing, all conversations face to face, cash only.

      Ha, @Kirk, only just now read your comment! Great minds, etc. etc.

  4. Tina says:

    Will be interesting to see what Boris says when he asked about this in an interview. Will he give more details or will the current BP convince him to keep quiet?

  5. TN Democrat says:

    Glad that Harry/Meghan got out and seem to have a happy life. Willy and Chuck would have never allowed Harry joy and would have openly tormented him in the UK. Both still openly brief against him, but at least he is not directly in their clutches and financially dependent on the them. Elizabeth tried… She was in her mid 90s and in failing health. She was no longer in charge and Charles chose to flex his power by bullying his younger son. Chuck and Willy have no character or common sense. Denying this story isn’t the flex Charles thinks it is. Bojo is a horror story, but Elizabeth knew that the Windsors needed Harry more than Harry needed them and tried to intervene even if it wasn’t in Harry’s best interest to stay.

  6. MrsCope says:

    Such a great point, Kaiser. I forgot that this would have been the Queen’s Buckingham Palace!

  7. Libra says:

    We’re so accustomed to being lied to by BP and KP that nothing they say anymore has credibility. If it’s in his book then his editors have a second source to back him up.

    • Lolo86lf says:

      Agree. You think they would just not saying anything about Harry being asked to stay or not back then. Harry is William’s only brother, and Charles’s other son, would it be so wrong to ask a son/brother to stay? If anything it would make Charles and William look more human and less proud and petty.

    • ML says:

      I wrote my comment before seeing yours, Libra. I also think that BoJo would have fixed what is otherwise a very expensive mistake without our having heard it, if it were untrue and he had no proof.

    • Hypocrisy says:

      I completely agree that BP and KP are not reliable sources especially when it comes to the Sussex’s, but neither is Boris who lies as frequently as Trump does. So unless Prince Harry issues a statement I’m ignoring all this drama.

    • SarahCS says:

      Wow, I never saw a dispute in which I agreed with Boris over anyone else being on the cards but here we are.

  8. Lavendel says:

    Johnson was part of Fleetstreet and still is today, isn’t he? Books that mention the HuM name so they can at least make some money are legion. Every article that covertly, overtly or via the headline attacks the Sussexes with their smear campaign often generates over 1000 – money making – comments that are so nasty, nasty and slanderous that they fulfil every aspect of dangerous bullying and defamation. The last few weeks have been all about attacking Harry’s entire private environment because he himself and his visible valuable work is increasingly protected by more powerful people who recognise and appreciate his great work. I think Meghan is holding back because she is working hard herself and perhaps also because she fears for the safety of Harry and their children. But I really hope she won’t keep quiet in the long run. In my opinion, that doesn’t slow these people down, but rather encourages them to become more and more vicious. The kind of brutal violence that has been publicly and daily perpetrated against the Sussexes, especially Meghan, for years will only stop if the thugs are stopped and boundaries are set.

  9. Amy Bee says:

    So who’s telling the truth? Both Boris and BP are notorious liars.

    • Eurydice says:

      It’s not inconceivable that BP hinted to Johnson. We know they wanted Harry to stay, just not with Meghan.

  10. Eowyn says:

    Narcissists use enablers as enforcers. That was BJs role. Imagine the pressure hearing you need to stay in the cult from the Prime Minister, even if he was (and still is) a clown.
    Wonder if PH recognizes he was raised in a cult.

  11. julie says:

    One of the two is lying and I honestly don’t know which one! 🙂

    • Lavendel says:

      They all win. B because his book is talked about, the palace because it makes him look “clean”, the newspapers because of the many clicks, because they push this contract saga.

    • sunnyside up says:

      I think it is more likely that BP is telling the truth, I never believe anything Bo-Jo says, The world’s second most famous liar, Trump is the most famous.

      • lesley says:

        It is the use of formal request that makes me wonder if Boris Johnson is telling the truth. Why not just say we made no such request.

  12. Pink tutu says:

    What happened to never complain, never explain? I’m so confused by these liars.

  13. Jay says:

    So much for the “non-political” royals, huh? Maybe I’m naive, but I never imagined that the palace would have so much power! If they could get the sitting PM to be their errand boy, what else can they do?

    I also want to know about the “PLCs” mentioned by Boris in the excerpt yesterday. I missed it, but someone else confirmed that it refers to a “public limited company”. Now, Bojo could have been talking about how Harry could work with PLCs, but couldn’t he also have been dangling some kind of financial incentives for them to stay? We already had Andrew’s “pitch @ palace” scheme and we know that Charles is happy to accept bags of cash as his due. Boris himself and his party members aren’t cleared of awarding public funds to their pals. So would it be surprising if they assumed that the Sussexes might work in the same corrupt way?

    • Magdalena says:

      “UK plc” is just another way of saying “the UK” = the country and its wider interests, in this case, locally and abroad.

      So H would have been of great benefit to “the UK and its wider interests” had he remained.

      Someone among the royal courtiers has noted that Sussex Squad and others have picked up on the fact that Johnson claimed to have been tasked with persuading H (only) to remain and are pointing out the racism of it all, in that they were attempting, yet again, to separate him from his wife and child, so later reports have been belatedly tacking M’s name onto it, as in “Johnson thought it would be beneficial for BOTH to remain”, except that is not what he said/wrote.

    • Deborah1 says:

      @Jay – “UK plc” was just a turn of phrase for BoJo, nothing more, nothing less. He’s fond of using flowery language (and sprouting Latin and Greek) because he thinks it makes him look clever.

      • Jay says:

        Gotcha – I had never heard the term before and thought it was weird that he would admit to dangling a financial incentive in his own memoir! But him trying to persuade Harry (not Meghan; not their baby) to stay in the UK probably just made it easier for both of them to leave! Boris is not particularly known for his delicate negotiating and deescalating skills, lol.

        If it is true that after dodging the issue for months and then refusing to listen to him, Harry’s family sneakily sent out Bojo the clown on a last ditch effort to pressure him to change his mind? I’d be livid.

    • Deborah1 says:

      @Jay – This is what the Sunday Times (Times of London) thinks about Bojo’s forthcoming memoir – full of derring-do, jolly japes and alluring alliteration. “UK plc” is just another example of his bombastic rhetoric when trying to impress his readers. I cannot take anything he says seriously.

  14. Visa Diva says:

    I don’t believe BoJo talked to Harry or that anyone at BP asked him to. Boris is a congenital liar and has all the charm and delicacy of a bull in a china shop. I don’t think anyone at BP would’ve trusted him with a delicate diplomatic task like talking to Harry.

    • sevenblue says:

      BP is no different. They lie too even for small things. Also, they are refuting the story with unnamed sources. If they were telling the truth, they could just do it officially with their spokesperson.

    • Libra says:

      @Visa Diva; a good editor checks facts and gets the details right. This claim in the book was given the okay to publish because there is proof. No editor wants to put their reputation on t he line by printing a falsehood. So I believe BoJo , based on this.

    • Deborah1 says:

      @Visa Diva – BoJo is no diplomat as witnessed during his stint as Foreign Secretary. One of his gaffes resulted in Nazanin Zaghari-Ratcliffe being kept in an Iranian prison for years. Unforgivable!

      • Eurydice says:

        Even if Johnson was a diplomat, what was there for a diplomat to do? It’s not like he could negotiate away Meghan or get the RF to stop being racist.

  15. sunny says:

    Which noted liar to believe?

  16. Kittenmom says:

    Recollections may vary, amirite?!?

  17. Deborah1 says:

    As I said in the other thread on this subject, *if* there was such a request from BP for BoJo to intervene, it would have come from QEII, not Charles. I remember reading somewhere that QEII was appalled by Bulliam’s vitriol towards Harry at the Sandringham Summit. Even her statement “Recollections may vary” had allegedly been suggested by Waity. The late Queen, for all her faults, had a soft spot for Harry.

    • Tessa says:

      I don’t think Kate came up with it probably some courtier

      • TigerMcQueen says:

        Yes, I believe that is what the story was. A courtier came up with that phrase and K lobbied strongly for it to stay in. We all know why now.

    • Ennie says:

      More than a soft spot for Harry, she was wise and knew it was counterproductive to the monarchy to abuse the Sussexes and then let them go like that, trying to erase their names from history.
      It is not the Sussexes fault that the tax dependent royals are such a bunch of do-nothings (heir and family) or short sighted and a terrible emotionally stinted father.

  18. StillDouchesOfCambridge says:

    All lies! 😂 the palace was desperate to keep harry! 💯 they asked him. They lost and are trying to keep face. Losers!

  19. Chantal1 says:

    Ok Bojo, time to be brave and bring out those receipts and show BP for the liars that they are! Or would KC the Petty view such an act as treason and go after Bojo with a vengeance? **Looks at the Sussexes** – never mind Bojo. You should probably keep cowering and simpering before the Lying King and his corrupt court. You and others like you couldn’t handle a tenth of the bs that BP, KP, and their minions have subjected the Sussexes to. This will be just be one more lie to add to your ever increasing catalogue.

  20. Vixxo says:

    Long may they fight 😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂

  21. RoyalBlue says:

    Everyone keeps trying to attach themselves to Harry’s name you would think he is the de facto leader. Best he just continues ignoring the noise from that tiny island.

  22. AC says:

    They are really in a deep mess over there.

  23. Maxine Branch says:

    At this point does anyone really care what this lying buffoon was asked to do? For me this is just gossip to sell a book. Nothing to discuss are see.

  24. Lau says:

    *Pretending to be shocked* What ? Boris Johnson lying ?
    Also he used to work for The Telegraph so you can be sure that they will be the first to call him out for lying.