Samantha Markle can’t believe what Meghan ‘has done to the Royal Family’

Something is going on in Isla de Saltines. In recent days, they’ve been pushing a lot of weird stories about the Duchess of Sussex and almost none of those stories have new information. It’s giving desperation, it’s giving “pay attention to me!” Speaking of, the Mail found some change at the back of the sofa, and they decided to pay Samantha Markle for another interview. When we last checked in on this c-u-next-Tuesday, Samantha’s defamation lawsuit against Meghan was being dismissed with prejudice back in March. Then Samantha and her lawyer gave some interviews about how they were not giving up and they’d find some way to continue to abuse the legal system to harass Meghan. So what’s new? The script Samantha is being paid to perform, I guess. Some lowlights:

Samantha’s mother died: Samantha Markle’s mother died six weeks ago. They had been estranged for many years. Things had been rocky anyway, but the nail in the coffin of their relationship, Samantha claims, was when her half-sister Meghan got engaged to Prince Harry, and the whole world turned its attention to the Markle family, in all its dysfunction. ‘And everyone sucked up to Meghan, even on the fringes of the family,’ says Samantha. ‘It was like the Emperor’s New Clothes. Unfortunately, my mother fell prey to it.’

Samantha talks to her father: She speaks to her father Thomas ‘every day, sometimes several times a day’, but Meghan has not been in contact since before her wedding. Thomas Markle has had two heart attacks and a stroke. He is 80, she points out, ‘and we don’t know how long he has’. Her anger returns. ‘Meghan has no idea what she is missing out on because when my dad goes, it will be too late. Believe me, I know. You can’t get back that time. It leaves a hole in your heart. When my father passes away, I hope she can feel, and remember he loved her more than life itself – or she will never be able to look in the mirror.’ She hasn’t finished. ‘Maybe Harry can learn something from me too,’ she continues.

The Sussexes’ interview with Oprah: ‘I don’t know the Royal Family. I’m just a human, watching from across the pond, but I couldn’t believe it.’ In particular, she was incensed by Harry’s implication he never had fun with Charles, and wasn’t able to go bike riding with him as a child. ‘Then we saw all those pictures of him rolling in the grass with Charles, laughing, riding on the back of his bike. I want to say to him “Why did you say it? Do you know what a gift that is? Maybe you didn’t get that every day, but you had it, and your family gave you those experiences”. I’d ask Harry “What did you give them? Heartache? Grief?”.’

How Meghan treated the Queen! ‘I never thought I would see Meghan do what she has done to the Royal Family. She’s done what she did to her own family to so many other people, too. I knew my dad had suffered, but I thought she would stop at the Queen.’ Samantha tells me ‘a line was crossed’ when Meghan mimicked curtseying to the Queen during the couple’s 2022 Netflix docuseries. ‘What a flagrant, nasty mockery of lovely royal protocol. And Harry sat there smiling, like a buffoon. He allowed it. In counselling [Samantha is a trained counsellor] we call this “enabling”.’

Her evolving view of Harry. ‘I used to think Harry was the victim here, that he had arrested development over the death of his mum and Meghan manipulated it. But there was no excuse for the things he said in his memoir Spare. There is no excuse for hurting people like that. Now I think of him as the teenage delinquent who throws stones at the windows of the school then sets it on fire, yet has the audacity to play the victim and say, “Oh I’ll come back to school on these terms”.’

On Meghan’s American Riviera Orchard line: The subject of American Riviera Orchard and Meghan’s lifestyle venture comes up – so far we’ve seen some jam and dog biscuits. ‘Is it in the shops? I don’t think it got beyond the PR stage,’ she muses ‘In the 70s, Tom [Samantha’s brother] and I would spend our summers with Grandma Markle and she did make jam, but that was long before Meghan was around. By the time she was interacting with Grandma Markle, she was in a care home and she certainly wasn’t making jam.’

[From The Daily Mail]

As a long-time reader of the British press/tabloids, I’m quite familiar with their talking points, Britishisms and worry-stones. Which is how I know Samantha was either operating from a script written by a British person, or she was being fed these lines by the Mail. No American says “is it in the shops?” No American gives a f–k if Meghan mocked the curtsy. No American thinks Spare was the story of a delinquent who constantly plays the victim. Between Samantha’s scripted interviews and her nuisance-suit harassment, Samantha is playing a really dangerous game. Also: with all of this talk about “family,” it’s good to remember that Samantha is estranged from her children, and Meghan is very close to her niece (Samantha’s daughter).

Photos courtesy of WENN.

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

92 Responses to “Samantha Markle can’t believe what Meghan ‘has done to the Royal Family’”

  1. Tessa says:

    Samantha us trotted out to distract from bad royal press. Who is paying her. Dad did not gave heart attacks or stroke. He had a camera crew with him when he had alleged stroke. Stroke victims are rushed to emergency. Then Samantha spreads fake stories. Meghan and harry need to file restraining order. She is such a disgrace as is tom sr and tom jr.

  2. Tessa says:

    A low point for the royal family when scam is used to praise them .

    • I agree that they have trotted her out to cover for their bad press. It’s what they do but I have said this before it just makes them look bad. Scammy is unhinged and people with brains who think for themselves see what she is doing. Was it Peg or Chuckles who wanted to drag her out?

      • Tessa says:

        It’s like when Carole pushes uncle Gary out to the media.

      • 809Matriarch says:

        They say it’s William who met with media bosses and asked them to use the Markle to harass Meghan. Any true journalists would dig deeper and see Sammie as she truly is.

      • Susan says:

        I Always check your comments to see if you have a ‘peg’, ‘chuckles’ or some derogatory name for Camilla or Catherine in your post.
        You never disappoint. Consistently consistent.

      • @Susan I aim to please or if you’re not really happy with them then such is life lol.

  3. lamejudi says:

    No one in the States calls a nursing home a care home.

    • Who Were These People? says:

      Second. US = nursing home. UK = care home. Canada = long-term care (LTC) home.

      • TOM says:

        Yeah, maybe run these scripts through Google Translate British English to American English before you publish, British Tabs. The mum-not-mom thing alone gives away the game.

      • Nic919 says:

        In Canada we will use nursing home or retirement home if it’s less medical intervention needed. We don’t ever use care home.

    • Barbara says:

      Same with using “mum” and “across the pond.” Americans don’t use those terms at all.

    • BeanieBean says:

      Um, er, yes, we do. At least at Kalaupapa. There’s a care home for the patients. That’s its official name & that’s what we call it. Oh, sorry, that’s here in Hawaii.

  4. Elizabeth Kerri Mahon says:

    Perhaps Samantha should spend more time trying to have a relationship with her own children instead of bashing Harry and Meghan.

    • Tessa says:

      I understand Sam is in back of spreading cruel rumors about the Sussex children . The sussexes should sue her then file a restraining order. Sam us being funded. The source should be investigated.

    • Nanea says:

      I guess dissing H&M pays better.

      And it seems the Fail is proud to be associated with Scammy, the way they’ve resurrected her. Which also finally explains who’s financing Scammy’s lawsuits. It’s not like we haven’t suspected it, but this looks like a reveal and an admission.

    • aquarius64 says:

      Scammy is obviously broke so she took the check to trash the Sussexes. She resents them because she and the rest of the Markle Monsters expected a come up when Meghan married into the BRF; something similar to the Middletons. Scam’s pamphlet of Diary of Princess Pushy’s Sister (should have been titled Diary of a Mad (i.e. unstable) White Woman) didn’t any
      money and she resents that Harry’s
      Spare made millions. And with an active bogus lawsuit against Meghan
      why is her lawyer letting her run her
      mouth to the press? She’s suing based on what was said on Oprah. The court ruled Meghan’s statements are opinion. But Sam can criticize what the Sussexes said there? If that idiotic lawsuit goes to trial anything Scammy says or have said is admissible in court. That includes tweets. Proper lawyers advise their clients to shut up during an active lawsuit. Also, Bad Dad volunteered to testify against Meghan in this foolishness and Scam had him named as a witness in court filings. Any contact with Toxic Tom by Meghan can be construed as witness tampering. Scammy boxed herself in and it will come back to bite her.

  5. Camomile says:

    Scammy didn’t say a word of that. It’s all made up bs, she just collects the cheque.

    Sure Scammy, you’ve got something to teach Harry?

    • SarahCS says:

      Quite, given all the US/UK inconsistencies that are being called out this sounds like they had a brief chat where she shared some family info and someone else wrote it all up to include the UK anti H&M talking points.

    • Debbie says:

      That’s why I thought it was very appropriate for Kaiser to describe Scamantha’s current effort as the BM “deciding to pay her for another interview.” It says it all, including their recent habit of trying to lure Harry to separate from his wife and family to return to England. It’s no surprise that in their script to Scamantha, she also has a change of heart about Harry. Surprise!

  6. Em says:

    No one cares anymore those who hate them will continue to hate them and those who like them will continue to like them. It’s hard to muster sympathy for the queen who has been dead for two years now so sorry to the british press but they won’t be winning over any new haters.

    Meghan must continue to pay them ( press/ her family / Harry’s family / British people) no attention

  7. Harla says:

    It’s truly frightening to find out that Samantha is a trained counselor! Omg! I really worry for anyone who goes to her expecting help and healing, I hope that she’s not practicing anywhere!

    • Kingston says:

      I strongly doubt that clown is a trained anything. She barely got her GED. That wh0re started hvng babies when M was an infant. She prolly started courses in diff fields & stopped before completion. Rmbr she tried being a model then tried being an actress. Failed.

      • Anonymous says:

        Petra here (still can’t post under my name)

        Apparently Yvonne Marie Markle (who changed her name to Samantha) attained a master’s degree in mental health and vocational rehabilitation counseling in 2008, and worked as a mental health counselor as per Wikipedia.
        Pity her patients.

        I find it even more funny that the haters who call Meghan “Rachel” as if she were the only person in the world going by her second name, never mention that Scammy uses a fake name. At least Meghan was named Rachel Meghan by her parents and was never called Rachel.

        Yvonne was called by her own mother a liar who was always jealous of Meghan. Wonder why her mother would “suck up to Meghan”. As the first wife of Thomas I seriously doubt she ever met the baby he had with his second wife, after she lost custody of her teenagers. A really great family, parents losing custody, children NC with their parents. The only normal ones seem to be Doria and Meghan. The rest ist even more dysfunctional than the RF.

    • Debbie says:

      Yeah, that word they used, “trained” is doing a lot of work in that sentence. Usually, an article would tell you the subject’s actual title and the place they worked in, or at least the type of place, such as a Speech Therapist, Marriage Counselor, or Mental Health Counselor in a Florida hospital or clinic, for example. Or they would say that she’s a licensed counselor with such and such degrees in the field of whatever, with 30 years experience, before retiring. Instead, all they say is that she’s “trained”, use your imaginations. Hmm.

    • kelleybelle says:

      She’s not a trained anything. All lies for her phony Twitter bio. She also has seven Facebook accounts. She got her GED in her early 40s. Always an epic fail, always.

    • Anonymous says:

      She’s not a trained anything. There’s NO evidence that Scammy has ever had a job. The woman only has a GED!

    • Deborah1 says:

      @Harla – I seriously doubt Samantha is a “trained counsellor”. Counsellor in what? In fact it’s the first I’ve heard of it. The fact that she is estranged from her own children should tell people all they need to know about her. She’s nothing more than a lying scumbag and a horrible human being. As a British person it’s embarrassing to have that part of Meghan’s family associated with the BRF. On the other hand her mother, Doria, behaves with extreme dignity.

    • BeanieBean says:

      That shocked me, too! Trained counselor, my Aunt Fanny!

  8. somebody says:

    In other words, Sam’s mom didn’t attack Meghan and told the truth about the scum that Sam and Thomas are. She has her nerve attacking PH over writing a book. At least his was truthful.

  9. Eurydice says:

    Huh, that first bit is interesting. So, Samantha’s mother “sucked up” to Meghan? More jealousy there?

    And Tom may have loved Meghan more than life itself, but he didn’t love her more than a check from the Daily Mail.

  10. Boxy Lady says:

    I distinctly remember the curtsey part of that documentary. Harry was NOT smiling during that part. In that moment, I don’t think he was sure if Meghan was mocking herself or his grandmother. But at the end, she said something like, I had no idea what I was doing, so it became clear that she was making fun of herself.

    I also caught that “in the shops” part. British media does that all the time, unfortunately. If I had a dollar for every time I read an interview in a British publication where an American supposedly referred to their mother as “Mum”, I would be a multimillionaire.

    • somebody says:

      Whether it made PH unhappy or not, bowing and scraping to a monarch deserves mocking.

    • Tessa says:

      The queen was curyseyed to. So how could Meghan mock queens curtsey s
      The bots claim harry was unhappy with it. Meghan made fun of how she herself curtseyed.

    • Camomile says:

      If Harry wasn’t happy with that part, it would have been edited out or redone. Does he have to smile 24/7 to avoid people crowing how unhappy he is because he’s NOT smiling?

      Obviously he knew she wasn’t mocking his grandmother. He also knew he was at fault not explaining things adequately.

    • Deborah1 says:

      @Boxy Lady – Yes, Harry raised his eyebrows when Meghan did that exaggerated curtsy in the documentary. He definitely was not smiling. I found it to be a bit of an awkward moment to be honest.

      • Nicky says:

        And yet Harry allowed the Meghan joke to make the cut and remain in the documetary. Harry “Big Red” did not seek to clarify the statement, because he was okay with it. A man willing to take on rupert murdoch, lord rothermere is nor coward. When people assumed the two royal racist were Queen Elizabeth and Prince Phillip, Harry was sure to go on record to correct the assumption. I assume he has not seeked to distant himself from the joke… is because he has a sense of humour.

  11. Fastgran50 says:

    I would like to know who’s paying her legal expenses. She had several lawyers had her case dismissed 3times.she has now went to appeal courts. I don’t know much about the cos of US Courts but here in the the UK she would have racked up a fair bill. Is the BM paying her costs?

  12. AlexandraS says:

    Samantha is NOT being trotted out to save the royals from bad press. Shes been given a microphone to smear Harry’s latest appearance at Invictus related matters, an entire arena cheering him, the hilarious tattoo skit and meghan’s dinner with Afrghan refugees. The Rota wont be able to keep this up, esp when Invictus hits in Feb. They cant “build up” will and kate because there is nothing there, so they have a go at harry/meghan. this will get old and ppl who arent 100% demon will eventually get bored.

    • Tessa says:

      It’s interesting though that Meghan and dad all of a sudden appear when royals get criticized like the,slum lord stories. I would be surprised if dad appears soon. And when Kate disappeared the dm made big deal about so called work separation of harry and Meghan

    • Tessa says:

      I don’t get why sam is allowed to publicly defame harry and Meghan.

      • AlexandraS says:

        I simply enjoy that Harry/Meghan, for the most part aside from defending themselves from Sam’s scammy defamation suit that got tossed.

    • L4Frimaire says:

      This! The Sussexes have been out and about promoting their causes and investments. They are looking happy, not mentioning the royals at all, and getting good press. Scammy is there to be a big bloated cloud raining on their parade. Seriously who cares. Especially with the same old tired attacks.

  13. Osty says:

    I love how you say some ” lowlights”😂😂😂😂

    • paintybox says:

      And “change from the back of the sofa” – 🤣🤣 🤣 – mental picture of Scammy picking the lint out of the few dirty coins in her palm.

  14. Lau says:

    Trash-talking your recently deceased mother … stay, classy, Samantha !

  15. Jais says:

    Was Meghan’s niece Ashley close to Samantha’s mom? If so, I’m sorry for her loss. All I can tell from this is that Samantha got paid.

    • Camomile says:

      Didn’t Samantha’s mum bring them up once she and her brother were removed from her care?

      • Jan says:

        Noelle, Scammy’s other daughter went to live with her maternal grandmother at age fifteen, after she was removed, because of abuse by her mother and partner.
        Once in awhile the court documents are posted on X.

    • Jan says:

      Ashley and her brother were adopted by her Father’s parents and they live in Virginia.
      Scammy’s mother, I think lived in New Mexico or California.
      I think she gave up the children for 10K, after she was caught drunk driving with them in the back seat.

    • Nanea says:

      @Jan: when I started typing, your reply to Jais hadn’t appeared yet.
      —————
      Ashleigh Hale was brought up by her paternal grandparents, who adopted her.

      I have no idea about her relationship with her maternal grandmother.

      But it’s clear that she’s better off not having had contact with Scammy.

  16. 809Matriarch says:

    @Em
    ITA. All this will do is generate more people to view Meghan and Harry with sympathy. That’s why I became a supporter.

    This woman practically described her mother as an immoral and loose unfaithful wife.

    Her “memoir” diary of Princess Pushys Sister was an exercise in MADNESS.
    https://thespectator.com/book-and-art/hellcat-loose-samantha-markle-meghan/

  17. Amy Bee says:

    Looks like the DM asked Scammy if they could use her to write article criticising Meghan and Harry and she said yes. The entire “interview” is just regurgitated British press talking points.

    • 809Matriarch says:

      @Amy Bee
      Sure is the truth. What gets me is the headlines saying Scammy’s ramblings are “fresh blows” to Meghan

      Meghan ain’t got that fruitcake on her mind.
      PERIODt.

  18. TN Democrat says:

    Good lort. I just love the archives on this site. Scammy first appears in the celebitchy.com archives in July 2018. Harry just gained access to the NGN and palace emails from 2013 to 2019. Think those emails will reveal who and how she was recruited as a tabloid source and who has been paying for these stories, feeding her content and paying for her frivolous lawsuits? Harry is positioned to reveal all about the invisible contract and receive a settlement so huge that the “Harry’s broke and returning with his tail between his legs” spin will be a thing of the past.

    • Kingston says:

      @TN Democrat
      Don’t count on that settlement being huge. The fact that H pushed to go to trial & has so far tefused to settle, could mean that he could very well hv to be the one to pay his opponents’ legal costs even if he wins his case. Yeah….the brit legal system is fucked-up.

      It’s a kind of rap on the knuckles for the winner of a civil trial for pushing for a trial, thereby “wasting” public money when the opponent had already virtually admitted defeat by offering a settlement.

      But for H, it’s not about money (even thos he doesn’t hv unlimited resources.) For him, it’s about pulling back the curtain & allowing the public to ser the nasty underbelly of how the british media employ criminality & hold powerful entities at ransom which, in order to protect themselves, they pay the ransom, thereby becoming complicit in the corruption.

      And these entities are the very ones that the public depend on for safety, security and the protection of the public interests.

    • Jais says:

      Hmm. It’ll be interesting to see what turns up from that time pd. I do think that certain key words are used as they go through emails. So I don’t think he has free reign. Could one of those key words potentially reveal something about the markles? It’s possible but not necessarily a sure thing.

  19. ThatGirlThere says:

    I don’t think Duchess Meghan has done enough to the royal family.

    I can’t believe Meghan’s dad chose the abusive grifter loser over the daughter who would have taken care of him till his dying days. The smarts and decorum clearly come from the Ragland side.

    • Eurydice says:

      The only thing Meghan “did” to the royal family is marry one of their own. Worse things are said about the RF every day – that they’re lazy, petty, lying, grifting slumlords – and that’s from their own tame propagandists.

      I don’t know that Tom chose Samantha so much as he got stuck with her once the dust settled. To me, he’s like those dim-witted petty crooks you see in movies, who always have some half-baked idea to score big and always end up being caught instead. I figure he thought he’d cash in the way people do in the Hollywood celebrity world – just give some insider gossip, collect a check and move on. But he didn’t get that the British tabloid agenda was different, much bigger and also fueled by the RF. And then, like stupid people do, instead of backing down he doubled down, again and again, until all he was left with was Samantha.

      • Gabby says:

        One would think Meghan’s dad would have told Sam to bug off and shut up in 2017-2018 when she first started blabbing to the press. He didn’t and then became even further intwined with her schemes, including those staged pap shots.

        This leads me to suspect Samantha had some dirt on their father that she was holding over his head. “Take my side or I’ll tell the press….”. I remember Tom Jr. saying something about his father taking sex trips to Asia, and I wonder if the half-siblings had some receipts on this.

      • BeanieBean says:

        Excellent assessment of the Tom Markle issue, @Eurydice.

  20. L4Frimaire says:

    Don’t put much stock into what Scammy says, or is paid to say. It’s weird seeing her pop up again. She’s been dormant for a while. This rehash of old tabloid fodder shows the level of desperation to distract from the Royals current messiness. Queen is dead, Meghan never mocked her, it’s been 5 years and they can’t seem to move on, because they need her as scapegoat. I will say, however, that Meghan’s situation with bad dad seems very unresolved and wonder why there was never a direct confrontation, because there’s so much I’d want to say to his face. Of course he’d just turn around and sell it to the tabloids and has no remorse so it’s an impossible situation. She said still a lot to unpack with what happened in UK.

  21. Lady Digby says:

    Does anybody know when Scammy last did an honest day’s work because she’s claiming her estranged half sister has somehow “damaged” her career?? I am doubtful that this whack job has ever worked as a counsellor or had any type of consistent work. The Fail article does cite her estrangement from mum and both daughters. One daughter goes on to say how SM always was jealous of Meghan and trash talked her, then tried to suck up when PH came on the scene. I found it interesting that they included this because it is obvious SM is problematic and Meghan has every reason to have nothing to do with an older half sister who has always been nasty to her

    • kelleybelle says:

      I believe it was that hack acting “job” on Matlock where she had to play dead. And she didn’t even do that well. So well over 35 years?

    • Anonymous says:

      NEVER! Scammy has NEVER had a job. Meghan use to send money to Sr & Sr. use to give some to Scammy. When Meg cut Sr. off he more than likely cut Scammy off. The degrees she claim, are lies. The picture she has w/ Meg was Scammy getting her GED.

  22. slippers4life says:

    Maybe William promised her a drafty dilapidated shack if she helped distract the news from he and Kate clearly negotiating the terms of a divorce. Funny how random nothingness from Samantha about Meghan from half a decade ago gets more attention than the obvious marital separation of the future king and queen.

  23. Hypocrisy says:

    When the family member you think destroyed your life will only acknowledge you with an attorney to speak for her, she isn’t the problem you are. These people have zero respect for her boundaries and obviously someone really is playing a Hail Mary to deflect from something going on over there. May be the king or waity are truly dying, or Willy is humping the rose bushes or Camilla is bedding the stable hands who knows with that family. What’s clear is they have doubled down the attacks on Meghan for doing absolutely nothing to them or even mentioning their existence.

  24. kelleybelle says:

    I can’t finish reading about her vile lies. The years have been kind to her: she is the same vile, lying slag she’s always been. She is 60 years old today and still a putrid pile of jealousy and hate.

    • BeanieBean says:

      What gets me is, there’s nothing new! Nothing in this stupid article is new information; the DM has already published all this BS under Scammy’s name as well as their own. Why? Why? Why? Meghan’s been gone for years, the Queen’s been dead for quite some time, what is the ever loving point of all this???

  25. bubblegum dreams says:

    This bitch again? Ugh

  26. trillion says:

    I listened to Spare only because I thought it would be juicy and damning against the BRF, but you know what? I thought Harry was restrained and even polite in his observations. No family is perfect and “royalty” is just invented b.s.: Thinking you’re better than others doesn’t make it so. When people complain about how Harry portrayed his family in the Spare, I just don’t get the pearl-clutching.

  27. Hypocrisy says:

    I hope Meghan is writing everything in her journals.. every slimy detail of what that family did and is still doing to her. Someone blew the moth balls off Scammy to use her name to bash Meghan once again, Peggy must be having tantrums … oh the money I would pay for Meghan’s book on everything is Chanel purse prices at this point

  28. b says:

    As a person who recently lost her own mother, the first excerpt hit me so hard: Samantha was estranged from her mother because when Meghan was being mistreated, her mother took Meghan’s side and not Samantha’s. Her hatred of her half-sister was so great that she wouldn’t accept that her mother liked Meghan, and so lost the final years of her mother’s life to her seething hatred. What a terrible shame for her. If she had any self-awareness, she would regret that.

  29. Saucy&Sassy says:

    Every time I read the phrase “across the pond” I find it an affectation and pretentious. I’ve never heard an American use the term.

  30. aquarius64 says:

    I have a tin foil tiara theory about Scammy and the rest of the Markle mutts: they are paid little or nothing by the BM. Meghan, an American, was about to marry Harry, the younger son of the future king of England. You try to tell me MI5 did not do background checks on Meghan and her families? Meghan came back clean, otherwise QE2 would not have given consent to Harry to marry Meghan, but Scammy, Toxic Tom and Jr. came back with problems. Some of it was released in the press, probably hoping to scare Harry off into marrying Meghan, but the real bad stuff was held back at the urging of the palaces. However the really ugly stuff was used by the BM to manipulate the Markles into doing these press hit jobs. Bad Dad would be the worst: seeing hookers in SE Asia, and any knowledge of Harry Weinstein’s s3xual assaults. Back story, when TT let it slip about his role in stopping the wedding on Aussie TV, he claimed the guy he was suing for the Pap gate pics had ties to Weinstein and set up compromising pics of the victims. How would TT know that and did he play a role? Imaging the Fail having that kind of payload, threatening TT with exposure that the US justice system can’t ignore. For its silence the Fail forces Bad Dad to do these interviews and pay him a pittance. That way he can’t cry victim because he was paid money. Scam and Jr. get their chump change for pushing Bad Dad to go along with the interviews but they have exposure too for conspiracy to extorrion.

  31. Kay Dozier says:

    When is this parasite going to permanently crawl back under her rock?

  32. tamsin says:

    Does anyone know what this woman’s source of income is? I shouldn’t think the BM is paying her handsomely for her bile.

Commenting Guidelines

Read the article before commenting.

We aim to be a friendly, welcoming site where people can discuss entertainment stories and current events in a lighthearted, safe environment without fear of harassment, excessive negativity, or bullying. Different opinions, backgrounds, ages, and nationalities are welcome here - hatred and bigotry are not. If you make racist or bigoted remarks, comment under multiple names, or wish death on anyone you will be banned. There are no second chances if you violate one of these basic rules.

By commenting you agree to our comment policy and our privacy policy

Do not engage with trolls, contrarians or rude people. Comment "troll" and we will see it.

Please e-mail the moderators at cbcomments at gmail.com to delete a comment if it's offensive or spam. If your comment disappears, it may have been eaten by the spam filter. Please email us to get it retrieved.

You can sign up to get an image next to your name at Gravatar.com Thank you!

Leave a comment after you have read the article

Save my name and email in this browser for the next time I comment