Guy Pearce has had an up-and-down career for many reasons. Back in the ‘90s, he could have been a leading man, the next big thing. But nowadays, he’s something more interesting – a character actor who pops in and out of TV projects and films, and is consistently one of the most underrated actors out there. Currently, he has a supporting role in The Brutalist, and he’s already picking up supporting-actor nominations for his performance. He recently chatted with Vanity Fair about the film and about his career. Some highlights:
He didn’t do any research on 20th century American industrialists for The Brutalist: “No. Maybe I copped out? But I just didn’t need to. I read the character and I could see who this guy is….I felt there was a voice I’d used before on Mildred Pierce that I could tap back into, mixed with the lovely voice of my friend Danny Huston, plus some gravel to give him some age. It was intuitive, but also an intellectual process…”
Working with Adrien Brody: “He is a very serious person, in the best possible way. He’s all business, but warm and engaging and considerate. He wants to know you are as serious as him with the work, as I am, and when the time was right we could natter about other stuff. I was aware he was carrying the film, so I didn’t want to get in his way. He was the one with all the work to do, but he’s lovely and really good at what he does. One of the best things about being an actor is working with better actors, and when you’ve got someone three feet in front of you offering a performance, you’re just going “wow, wow, look at him go. Oh sh-t, I have a line of dialogue now.”
His attitude towards the awards season hype: “My attitude is mixed. You are dealing with your ego and just doing good work. If I watch a finished film and think “f–king ‘ell that’s great,” that’s the be-all and end-all. I’ve seen some things win over others and think, “I don’t get that, am I missing something?” So I can’t be objective. It also makes me awkward and uncomfortable. I’ve been nominated for things, and when I don’t win I’m relieved I don’t have to make a speech. Then later I think “it might have been nice!”
Whether he had a good experience working with Kevin Spacey: “No.”
Working on ‘Memento’: “[Carrie-Anne Moss] was good fun. I’ve lost touch with her, unfortunately. She had a good sense of humor, but it’s hard to compete with Chris Nolan. He’s such a towering intellect. When my friend Piper Perabo was working on The Prestige, I called her to see how it as going, and she said “oh, Chris Nolan, he’s this towering intellectual, a total cinephile, and Christian Bale is all internal and actor-y and method, and then Hugh Jackman is hosting a dinner party.” But me and Carrie-Anne and Joey Pants [Joe Pantoliano] were having a lovely, fun time together. [Pantoliano] taught me so much about film acting, just by riffing. I’m not an improviser, but he is. So I had to learn to deal with it, and it was a great experience. A good teacher.
He hasn’t spoken to Nolan much over the years: “Not really, but he spoke to me about roles a few times over the years. The first Batman and The Prestige. But there was an executive at Warner Bros. who quite openly said to my agent, “I don’t get Guy Pearce. I’m never going to get Guy Pearce. I’m never going to employ Guy Pearce.” So, in a way, that’s good to know. I mean, fair enough; there are some actors I don’t get. But it meant I could never work with Chris. [Warner Bros. has not responded to a request for comment.] I think he just didn’t believe in me as an actor.
Which roles he was up for in Nolan’s films: “They flew me to London, to discuss the Liam Neeson role for Batman, and I think it was decided on my flight that I wasn’t going to be in the movie. So I get there and Chris is like “hey, you want to see the Batmobile and get dinner?”
Unpopular opinion, but I actually don’t think Nolan is great at casting. He’s made some good choices (especially for lead roles), but sometimes his films are full of actors in supporting roles and it’s like he picked their names out of a hat. This is like a glimpse of what Nolan was dealing with at Warner Bros though – executives who used their power to shut down Nolan’s original casting choices. Now, that being said, Pearce in the Liam Neeson role in Batman Begins would have been weird. I could have seen Pearce in The Prestige though. As for the other people Pearce worked with… he had lovely things to say about everyone other than Kevin Spacey, who he clearly loathes. It’s funny. Imagine that’s your big introduction to American films, working with Kevin Spacey. Ugh. Poor Guy.
Photos courtesy of Avalon Red.
Well, if nothing else, Warner Brothers’ current incarnation shows they are–at least–as short sighted now as they were in the 00s onward regarding Pearce.
At least they are consistent in their wrongness.
I find it fascinating (and often frustrating) when we get to peep behind the curtain at this sort of stuff. I don’t think I’ve seen him in a ton of stuff but I’ve always enjoyed his performances, including in Neighbours back in the day!
I feel like Brad Pitt has had the career that Guy Pearce could have (should have? 🤷🏽♀️) had.
I love his VERY Australian honesty. And he gets to be that that honest because he’s not being cast. He’s a great actor better than many of the current celebs, but he’s right: It’s about the who, mostly.
He’s worked pretty steadily here on a whole range of things including my dad’s favourite show – Jack Irish.
That’s the show I was thinking of! I really liked him in that!
Interesting. I’ve never heard of a male actor getting black listed like this. I wonder what he did to piss them off.
Honestly? Could have been nothing. I have seen people at work try to flex by making pronouncements like this always about people who can’t fight back and aren’t working for the company, like freelancers. They puff themselves up by thundering nooooo not HIM/HER/THEY as if they are making some kind of principled or wise stand.
The whole point of Guy Pearce is that you don’t get him, you know? That is a needed quality for some parts, especially Nolan pictures.
Presuming that/those execs at WB had never heard of mystique. They probably wouldn’t have gotten Garbo either.
Honestly it sounded to me less like a “blacklist” than a self-important studio suit waving around his dicta (!) with no boundaries or integrity. Specifically, no respect for the filmmaker or the creative process, and no understanding of the impact of that sort of abuse of power.
Maybe it was because he played a gay man who was a drag queen too well, and the studio execs were just homophobic. I don’t recall Hugo Weaving or Terrance Stamp getting any work in the US either after Priscilla Queen of the Desert came out in ’94. I do remember watching an episode of Donahue that year where Guy and the rest of the cast had to explain that it was just a movie, that they were just acting, and btw there’s nothing wrong with being gay. There was someone representing a ‘family values’ group on the panel as well. There was a real scare over people watching drag queens and enjoying it! The 90’s was a very different time, as the far right laments now…. Guy was incredible in Memento for Chris Nolan.
Wrong. Priscilla was 1994. Guy Pearse did L.A. Confidential in 1997 and Memento in 2000. Hugo Weaving did The Matrix in 1999 and The Lord of the Rings trilogy two years later. Terrance Stamp was in Star Wars in 1999. All major motion pictures so playing gay men did not hurt their careers.
Keanu Reeves has talked about how Fox refused to work with him for a long time after he turned down Speed 2. Even after The Matrix, he was blacklisted from the Fox lot. Didn’t end until he did The Day the Earth Stood Still for Fox in 1999.
Part of the problem of dealing with racism and sexism is that even in the part of the world where it’s all white men, incredibly petty shit goes down. Yes, it’s white male supremacy, but “Supremacy” is what drives it. And that’s not going away anytime soon.
Its interesting to me because I think we assume that directors, especially directors like Nolan, have a lot of control and autonomy over their projects. and here its clear that he didnt if Guy Pearce was just basically written off as an option for him. but then you wonder – if Nolan had gone to bat for Pearce, would that have helped?
I cant see him in the Batman Begins role that went to Neeson but I’m sure there were other Nolan projects along the way where he might have fit. And Nolan definitely finds actors he likes and sticks to them.
I wondered that as well, if Nolan could have pushed for him.
I’m surprised people are surprised by this. The Hollywood Machine has always been extremely political and incidents like this happen all the time, even to powerful directors like Nolan. The thing is, the market is so saturated with the mid-level talent that these comic book movies require that often there are four or five actors who are suitable for a particular part. All things being equal, you could see an exec’s personal opinion being a practical factor in terms of whittling down the choices. I love Guy but personally I have never seen him as leading man material. *shrugs*
I just watched LA Confidential again last week and was thinking how good he was in that movie – especially working with Russel Crowe.
I watch that movie at least once a year – great performances, sets, costumes, and plot!
Great movie! Everyone is good (Danny DeVito is a delight in his relatively small part) but the movie doesn’t work without Guy Pearce.
That movie is so so good. Such excellent acting all around.
ImHO, Guy Pearce is one of the best parts of anything he’s in- he is never the weak link. He can chew scenery, he can be subtle, funny or terrifying. He’s got a great and very specific energy but he’s also a chameleon. I always wondered why he wasn’t in more stuff and it’s so frustrating that one person’s (bad) taste can keep a talent like that from us.
I totally agree with this — he’s just so good in everything: The Rover, Mare of Eastown, Animal Kingdom, Iron Man…. There’s not a bad performance in his career.
Hmmm….. Lockout and The Time Machine are pretty average imo.
But yes, way more good roles than bad ones. He’s had a pretty consistent and successful career I think and just the right level of fame he’s comfortable with.
Agreed. He’s a brilliant actor who can shape shift into so many different types of roles. I also love the mystique of an actor that keeps to themselves outside of promotion so when you see them on screen, you see the character as opposed to the actor.
He was amazing in Lawless, I’m STILL mad at his character.
I like Christopher Nolan but I don’t think he’s this towering genius that other people (mainly men) paint him out to be. He really needs to learn how to develop better women characters in his films — what he did to Talia al’Ghul (Marion Cotillard) in Dark Knight Rises was criminal. I did think Emily Blunt was fabulous in Oppenheimer, but it was a supporting role in every sense of the word.
I’m so excited to see the love Guy Pierce is getting. I’ve loved him since LA Confidential in the 90s. I thought he was so sexy (and he still is). This is really shaping up to be a fantastic awards season, especially in all four acting categories. Lead and supporting actress are bloodbaths!
Also, I love what he said about Carrie-Anne Moss. She’s such a queen.
Totally agree with you on all your points. Inception made no sense and he is male-gazey and often doesn’t know what to do with women characters: Florence Pugh’s character in Oppenheimer, Anne Hathaway in Interstellar (objectified as a love interest by the end and makes a major professional decision based on love), Marion’s motivations/reasoning in Inception just made no sense. Also very heavyhanded. Consistently over-the-top machismo energy (Tom Hardy in Dunkirk). Male-gazey about women and machismo energy.
Nolan is this generation’s Kubrick, to a great degree. An amazing visual eye, lots of stunning moments/innovative FX. But he’s fundamentally icy/remote about characters—and too often plots like he’s trying to deliver endless one-upping water cooler moments. And his female characters are shamefully lacking in depth or real understanding, which has become an increasing problem in his movies.
He could be Chris Pine’s older brother.
In the top picture he looks like a very attractive version of David Spade.
Studio executives always want to be creative. It must be so tiring for Directors to deal with. To get the money to make the movie. Acquiescing to their silly demands.
And the second Nolan walked away from the WB they went against his wishes for not having another Joker with the same look Heath Ledger had in The Dark Knight. For Joker: Folie à Deux.
Shame on Warner Bros.
I love Guy Pearce. If you haven’t seen LA Confidential…he was great in it. I loved his character so much (stuck to his integrity in a cesspit by relying on his wits and skills). I’m not too sure about Kim Basinger’s role though, in a feminist sense or whatever.
I don’t agree Chris Nolan is a towering intellect. Maybe a cinephile but his films are very overrated and he writes women poorly.
Acting is a profession that breed insecurity, looks like. So many people have an input into your casting, looks, performance, etc. It’s easy to get obsessed over one or two decisions like Guy seems to be doing here. The truth is, he’s had an amazing career.
He’s terrific. Can play nuance, pure evil ( Brimstone) or kind. Shouldn’t have any regret about the Nolan collaboration. His teaming with Hillcoat ( The Proposition or The Road) and Michôd were great.
He was on point with his Warhol portraying in Factory girl.
Saw the wonderful Guy Pearce in a homewares store in Melbourne. He was wearing a hoodie and keeping a low profile. My noisy friends, Jill and her husband, also named Guy, were with me. Jill started shouting out ‘Guy!’ to alert her husband to some product or other and Guy Pearce looked terrified thinking he was being called and ducked behind a shelf before hotfooting it out of the shop.
He’s a fantastic actor though and i’ll watch anything with him in it.
Guy Pearce is great in the Jack Irish series.