Spotify: Drake’s conspiracies about Kendrick Lamar are all false & ‘far-fetched’

I’ve been listening to Kendrick Lamar’s GNX since he dropped it just before Thanksgiving. It’s a great album, maybe the best album of the year. Kendrick really dominated the year, handily winning his hip-hop battle with Drake, creating one of the biggest hits of the year (“Not Like Us”) and basically doing a victory lap with GNX. Kendrick’s many victories are made sweeter by the fact that Drake has completely lost the plot. Drake could have lost with some kind of dignity, but instead he lied about Kendrick, lied about Kendrick’s partner, lied about Kendrick’s friends, and then Drake refused to just go away for a year and come back with some good music. Just before Thanksgiving, Drake filed legal actions against UMG and Spotify over the rap battle. As in, Drake claims that Universal Music Group (his own label) orchestrated Kendrick’s win and that Spotify helped manipulate Kendrick’s win as well. As in, Spotify and UMG somehow wanted Kendrick to win and take down Drake, and Spotify and UMG are guilty of “allowing” Kendrick’s “Not Like Us” to become one of the biggest hits of the year. Well, it’s taken weeks, but Spotify has finally responded:

Spotify is firing back at Drake’s accusations that the streamer helped Universal Music Group artificially boost Kendrick Lamar’s “Not Like Us,” calling the allegations “false” and blasting the rapper’s legal action as a “subversion of the normal judicial process.”

The new filing is the first response to a petition filed last month in which Drake accused UMG and Spotify of an illegal “scheme” involving bots, payola and other methods to pump up Lamar’s song — a track that savagely attacked Drake amid an ongoing feud between the two stars. In a motion filed Friday in Manhattan court, the streaming giant says it has found zero evidence to support the claims of a bot attack, and flatly denies that it struck any deal with UMG to support Lamar’s song.

“The predicate of Petitioner’s entire request for discovery from Spotify is false,” the company’s lawyers write. “Spotify and UMG have never had any such arrangement.”

Beyond denying the allegations, the filing repeatedly criticizes Drake for going to court in the first place — calling his claims of a conspiracy “far-fetched” and “speculative,” and questioning why Spotify (a “stranger” to the “long-running fued” between Drake, Kendrick and UMG) is even involved. Spotify also criticized Drake for the way in which he brought his claims to court — not as a full-fledged lawsuit, but as an unusual “pre-action” petition aimed at demanding information. The company accused Drake of using that “extraordinary” procedure because his allegations are too flimsy to pass muster in an actual lawsuit and would have been quickly dismissed.

“What petitioner is seeking to do here … is to bypass the normal pleading requirements … and obtain by way of pre-action discovery that which it would only be entitled to seek were it to survive a motion to dismiss,” Spotify’s lawyers write. “This subversion of the normal judicial process should be rejected.”

In a statement to Billboard later on Friday, Drake’s legal team (from the law firm Willkie Farr & Gallagher) said: “It is not surprising that Spotify is trying to distance themselves from UMG’s allegedly manipulative practices to artificially inflate streaming numbers on behalf of one of its other artists. If Spotify and UMG have nothing to hide then they should be perfectly fine complying with this basic discovery request.”

[From Billboard]

As Kendrick said, “You crash out, then you better break the backboard.” As in, you better smash everything to smithereens when you’re crashing out. That’s not what Drake is doing though. I mean, yes, he’s crashing out. But this is just sad. He’s created this highly specific delusion that UMG and Spotify were in cahoots to make one of Kdot’s songs a huge hit, and for what? I don’t understand what Drake thinks the motive would be. It also looks like the biggest delusional cope from Drake, who fundamentally cannot understand why “Not Like Us” struck such a chord (A Minoooooor). As soon as Kendrick dropped the song on a Saturday, it was a MASSIVE hit, a phenomenon which organically became the song of the summer because every single person was singing it.

Photos courtesy of Drake’s Instagram.

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

8 Responses to “Spotify: Drake’s conspiracies about Kendrick Lamar are all false & ‘far-fetched’”

  1. SarahMcK says:

    The A minor line is probably one of my top five favorite song lyrics. Just chef’s kiss.

  2. Janet says:

    I was never really a fan of Drake. He has a few good songs but more often sounds the same ova and ova. He always kinda seemed like a suck to me and now I KNOW he is lol.

  3. Nanea says:

    “Spotify is firing back at Drake’s accusations that the streamer helped Universal Music Group artificially boost Kendrick Lamar’s “Not Like Us,” calling the allegations “false” and blasting the rapper’s legal action as a “subversion of the normal judicial process.””

    As I said before, my son is currently in Toronto, and it’s winter, and some cars passing him still blast “Not like us” with (slightly) opened windows, while going up and down Yonge St.

    Sometimes we’re wondering if Drake ever makes it downtown, if he’s spending time at that mall-like structure he’s calling home at all. If he did, he’d notice it’s completely organic. Because it hit a nerve and people like it.

  4. SarahCS says:

    This seems like some psychology textbook breakdown of what happens when someone has a big ego, money, and surrounds themselves with a bubble of people paid to agree with them. Fortunately we know enough about Drake to be able to sit back and enjoy the show because he’s shown us all how laughable he is and we owe a debt to Kendrick Lamar for putting his talents to such good use.

    This was organic because it hit all the right notes at just the right time. I couldn’t tell you for definite if I’d ever listened to anything by Kendrick Lamar previously but I certainly have now.

  5. sevenblue says:

    Not that I am agreeing with, but I think Drake’s allegation is, his label wanted to weaken his position during negotiations for their future contracts. That is why they “allowed” Kendrick’s full attack against him and encouraged it with the paid algorithms. What I get from this, his label protected him in the past against other rappers, they didn’t let anyone go against Drake. That is, he is basically admitting they were protecting him in the past.

  6. crazyoldlady says:

    the photo accompanying this post – says it all

  7. Izzy says:

    Someone really needs to sit Drake and his legal team down and give them a full, detailed presentation on the concept of the Streisand Effect.

  8. Anon @ Work says:

    I never liked Drake because he can’t seem to be able to stay away from underaged/barely legal girls, but this is sad even for him. Bro just can’t take the L and it only makes people want to root for Kendrick even more.

Commenting Guidelines

Read the article before commenting.

We aim to be a friendly, welcoming site where people can discuss entertainment stories and current events in a lighthearted, safe environment without fear of harassment, excessive negativity, or bullying. Different opinions, backgrounds, ages, and nationalities are welcome here - hatred and bigotry are not. If you make racist or bigoted remarks, comment under multiple names, or wish death on anyone you will be banned. There are no second chances if you violate one of these basic rules.

By commenting you agree to our comment policy and our privacy policy

Do not engage with trolls, contrarians or rude people. Comment "troll" and we will see it.

Please e-mail the moderators at cbcomments at gmail.com to delete a comment if it's offensive or spam. If your comment disappears, it may have been eaten by the spam filter. Please email us to get it retrieved.

You can sign up to get an image next to your name at Gravatar.com Thank you!

Leave a comment after you have read the article

Save my name and email in this browser for the next time I comment