Justin Baldoni’s lawsuit: Blake Lively didn’t even read Colleen Hoover’s book

Justin Baldoni and his publicists sued Blake Lively, Ryan Reynolds and their publicist Leslie Sloane on Thursday, January 16. Blake, Ryan and Leslie Sloane are being sued for $400 million. The whole situation has become radioactive, and yet Baldoni’s countersuit is also a gossip goldmine. As people are reading through the lawsuit, several pieces of information have already jumped out.

Blake probably didn’t read Colleen Hoover’s book? According to the lawsuit, Lively made “wrongheaded creative decisions” that “reflected her fundamental lack of understanding of the book the film was based on…This came as no surprise to her worried colleagues, given that, even well into production, Lively had not even read the book,” the lawsuit alleged of the actress, 37. A text message from Baldoni to Heath that’s included in the lawsuit says that the creative team read and re-read Hoover’s novel, and afterward “combined scenes to heighten the stakes for” Baldoni’s character Ryle Kincaid “in pursuit of” Lively’s character Lily Bloom, “utilizing humor and his desire to sleep with her.” “While I understand Blake’s reasons for not wanting to read the book, the book does a very good job in getting in Lily’s mind during her interactions with Ryle and setting up the WHY behind her attraction to him, which ultimately helps us understand why she stays in the end,” the text message included in the lawsuit reads. She even tried to “Google” the color of her character’s hair rather than pick up the book, court documents allege.

The “it smells so good” conversation: Baldoni recalled filming a scene with Lively where she apologized for the smell of her spray tan and body makeup. Baldoni responded, “It smells good,” and continued acting. (In Lively’s paperwork filed last month, she told a different story about Baldoni’s remark, claiming: “At one point, he leaned forward and slowly dragged his lips from her ear and down her neck as he said, ‘It smells so good.’ None of this was remotely in character, or based on any dialogue in the script, and nothing needed to be said because, again, there was no sound.”)

Blake told Baldoni that he needed a nose job: Baldoni alleged in his latest filing that Lively soon “began to joke about Baldoni’s nose, which he laughed off and joked in turn, even as Lively joked that he should get plastic surgery.” “While on the one hand, Lively accuses Baldoni of making comments about her appearance, on the other she made derogatory comments about Baldoni’s appearance, telling him he should undergo rhinoplasty (a nose job) – something Baldoni has publicly expressed insecurities about and has discussed on an episode of his podcast, ‘Man Enough,’ exploring the topic of body dysmorphia,” court documents stated. “Lively’s comment about Baldoni’s nose is also captured on camera. Baldoni, rather than write down a list of grievances against Lively, brushed it off and moved on with the scene.”

Blake refused to meet with reps from a domestic violence charity: Wayfarer decided that one percent of the film’s proceeds would be donated in support of survivors of domestic abuse. No More, an organization dedicated to ending domestic and sexual violence by increasing awareness, inspiring action, and fueling culture change, would be chosen as the recipient. Baldoni’s team alleged in court documents that Lively “refused the opportunity to meet with No More, despite playing the lead role in a movie centered on themes of survival and resilience in the face of domestic abuse.” He also claimed Lively was irresponsible with her promotion of the film, pointing out that her alcohol line, Betty Booze, was involved in some of the marketing, which he found problematic as domestic violence statistics link alcohol and abuse. Unbelievably, Lively made this harmful and irresponsible message worse by naming a drink at her premiere afterparty ‘Ryle You Wait,’” he wrote in the docs.

Blake thought Lily Bloom was rich: Lively allegedly ignored the director’s vision for her character when picking out her looks for the movie. “At one point, Lively insisted that her character ‘had money’ and could afford $5,000 shoes—despite being a fledgling small business owner,” court documents alleged. According to the lawsuit, Lively also often refused to participate in wardrobe fittings at a production office 15 minutes from her home. Instead, “she insisted that the costume department pack up wardrobe and deliver it to her personal residence,” which took time and money.

[From Us Weekly]

So, I watched It Ends With Us before all of the lawsuits started, and the money stuff was driving me crazy. The film couldn’t decide if Lily Bloom was rich or poor or wore designer clothes or thrift store finds or how she had the money to start a flower shop. I couldn’t even tell how old Lily Bloom was supposed to be – there were so many moments where I thought Blake was (unconvincingly) playing Lily as a woman in her early 20s. The fact that Blake just f–king refused to read the book is one of the funniest things I’ve ever heard in my g–damn life though. It makes a lot of sense, having seen the movie – Blake was apparently doing all of these bizarre rewrites and Googling her character’s bio rather than just spending a day reading the book. No wonder her promotion was “wear your florals and buy my booze” as well. I’m also screaming at the “Ryle You Wait” cocktail.

Photos courtesy of Backgrid, Cover Images.

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

70 Responses to “Justin Baldoni’s lawsuit: Blake Lively didn’t even read Colleen Hoover’s book”

  1. Louise says:

    Um, none of that has anything to do with having your best friend stand in for the actor playing the doctor in the blake-will-be-mostly-naked birth scene. Or the social media onslaught. Or barging into her trailer when she was changing. Or or or. And as far as we’ve been told she promoted the damn movie the way the entire cast was instructed to, by the studio. It would be really nice if we could retain information from day to day.

    She didn’t read the book is NOT the defense he thinks it is.

    • Sam says:

      Exactly 💯

      • Lola says:

        There are also a lot of actors who prefer to base their work on the script rather than the book, and so who don’t read the book beforehand.
        A book is not a script, and there are usually a lot of differences, major or minor, between a book and a script based on it.
        As for googling something specific about hair color, even having read the book you don’t retain 100% of it, it’s bonkers to attack her on a Google search.

      • agirlandherdogs says:

        Would many actors read the book? Absolutely. But maybe that’s just not her process. It actually feels insulting to whomever adapted the screenplay. Like their adaption could not possibly be sufficient for Lively to base her characterizations on.

        I have no strong feelings about either one of them (I’d never even heard of him before this mess), but I’d say regardless of the winner, no one wins here. Both their careers are over. Reynolds will survive because he’s Ryan Reynolds. But even if Lively prevails, no one will want to work with her.

    • Steph says:

      This info is to prove his suit not evidence against hers.

      • Becks1 says:

        I’ve tuned out on a lot of the happenings here and havent followed a lot of the recent updates but I’m skimming and this is a good point.

        This is a separate lawsuit, not a defense to hers. So while I agree with the OP on its face that these allegations do not disprove hers, they’re not supposed to. His defense to her lawsuit and his response in filings and such is supposed to do that. This is a lawsuit with separate allegations against Blake and her team.

      • Jais says:

        Huh. So the point of this suit is not to disprove Blake’s SH charges. Bc it def isn’t. So it’s just a whole nother case. At the end of the day, I’m waiting to see how and if he can defend himself from those charges. Which I guess will happen in court? At some point? Which could take years to get to? I actually don’t know. What would be the time frame for that?

      • Louise says:

        I was debating the point made by Kaiser in the article, that THIS is why she promoted it the way she did. And if you don’t think this suit is in defence of the other, I have a bridge I’d like to sell you.

        And all this BS about who has more to lose – WHO CARES?! Are we really okay with people who don’t want to be sexually harassed being dragged in social media for simply saying so?

      • Becks1 says:

        @Louise – of course PR wise this is in “defense”, but its not legally the defense. That’s why he’s not responding specifically to the claims in her lawsuit, which people are taking to mean that he can’t respond to those claims. Maybe he can’t, no one here knows, but this lawsuit is not meant to respond to the specific allegations in BL’s suit. PR wise, sure, its meant to counteract her claims and present a different picture of what happened, but PR claims are different from legal ones.

      • DK says:

        @Becks1, I’ve seen that in a few comments – that his law suit is entirely separate from hers, not a counter suit.

        But I’m confused – what is JB suing BL for, then?

        This is a sincere question, since all I’m seeing are things that amount to, BL may have been annoying to work with, but nothing illegal that would form the basis of a lawsuit?

        Like, not reading the book the movie was based on makes total sense: some actors prefer not to have preconceived notions from other versions of the story they are telling with their film version. If he didn’t assign the book to the actors in his capacity as director, it seems absurd to subsequently sue them for a different method of character prep than JB believes in?

        And as for the whole Taylor Swift thing… it’s cringe for sure, but on both JB and BL’s part – so one of his actors had him over for dinner, floated her idea of rewriting a scene by him, and her husband and bestie gushed over it. He’s a grown adult and the boss, he could have been politely complimentary but noncommittal during the meal, or just promised to take a look but make no further promises. Suggesting that he had to do something bc Taylor Swift was encouraging him to makes him sound like a child.

        And none of that seems like grounds for a lawsuit?

        In fact, it all seems like a way to just further complain about BL and her annoying – but not illegal – behaviors.

        So I’m confused by what’s actually going on in his lawsuit? What is the legit foundation of it?

      • Becks1 says:

        @DK I haven’t read his lawsuit in this case (its linked somewhere in the comments on one of these posts from CB) but the other post lays out what his claims are – intentional interference with a contract, interference with future earnings (this one is probably the hardest to prove IMO but may be where the bulk of the 400m claim comes from) and a few other things along those lines. I think defamation is one of them but can’t remember without switching to the other post.

        I think the TS argument is that he tried to push back against her rewriting the scene, and then by bringing in Taylor and Ryan (wtf is TS doing in this mess?!?!) he felt like he lost power in this interaction and had to give in. One of the hallmarks of sexual harassment is power so this is actually an interesting tidbit because it demonstrates that the balance of power was on Blake’s side, not his. So this is what I mean when I say this is a PR defense to her claims even if not specifically a legal one (yet.)

        Again without having read the lawsuit (I have real legal work to do and I tell you, royal gossip is much easier to follow than this lol), I would guess that this is part of one of the interference claims.

        And again I have no idea who is right or wrong here. I’m just here for the general messiness and drama of all of this and will probably tap out of this story for another few weeks after this, LOL.

      • DK says:

        @Becks1, thank you! That was very helpful! (And I finally saw the post with the initial description of his complaint – so many posts on this this morning! It *does* seem like it will be a lot to go through to understand fully!)

        I appreciate your explanation and summary!

    • ML says:

      Excellent response, Louise!

      1. The author supported BL, not JB.
      2. As long as BL read *the script*, she would have had the information.
      3. In theory, JB has a point with the money issues, BUT, tbf to BL Hollywood usually gives poorer characters homes and wardrobes they never could afford IRL. This movie was not a documentary.

    • GJ says:

      And none of his allegations rise to the level of a successful lawsuit. His allegations are straight out of his and his PR’s playbook from my last summer.

      • Lo says:

        I’m not a Justin defender but he also he filed a lawsuit so that he can then get to discovery.
        He doesn’t have as detailed information because private communications weren’t given to him like it was for Blake.
        Either way I agree this is messy. I feel like they’ll eventually settle because Blake and Ryan have more to lose in discovery.

    • Sassy says:

      Exactly.

    • Chaine says:

      I mean why would she have to read the book? Did the movie not have a script? It’s hardly as if a multimillion dollar production would expect the leds to merely read the book and improvise their way through every scene…

      • Becks1 says:

        I would sort of agree with that as an actress, but she wanted EP credit and she wanted creative control, and for that it just makes sense to me that she would read the source material. (I mean the book can be read in a day, its not War and Peace.)

        I’m not sure that’s something you can sue over though.

      • Eurydice says:

        That’s why there’s a director. The director is the one with the creative vision, which is based on the source material, the script and whatever message is drawn from them. And all the other creative decisions – costume, lighting, sets, locations, etc. – refer back to that. If an actor wants to change the script, rewrite scenes, change the costumes, emphasize a new message, then they’re taking over the director’s job and it would be good if they read the book.

      • Starla Dear says:

        Finding free time after work to read a novel—with three young kids at home—might be a challenge!

      • Jais says:

        On this one point though, Ryan and Blake rewrote a scene in the script so I can see why having read the source material would make sense. Just saying. But either way, this detail is about Justin’s case and does not disprove the SH claims.

    • AD says:

      He did not barge into her trailer. I believe Ms. Lively wanted to own the script so she could do the Part 2. And was working behind the scenes to make that happen.
      Her hands are not clean either. So let them duke it out in court and may the best man win.

    • Sarah says:

      Absolutely. All the whining about what she did on said has nothing to do with harassment. There’s a whole lot of distraction here. And projection.

      • CruzMom says:

        Not to defend someone who may very well be a sexual harasser, but I read the complaint, and he actually does address the SH claims in this complaint pretty specifically. I think this article is just covering some of the gossipy parts.

    • GrnieWnie says:

      Yeah, exactly. Plus didn’t Blake have a four month old baby at home? I know mothers are never supposed to let the fact of motherhood intervene at work but maybe that affected some decisionmaking here, God forbid. Plus it isn’t a crime to be dumb; it is a crime to sexually harass someone.

      Anyway, he certainly doesn’t come off as the David to Blake’s Goliath. He’s got access to a lot of money to file lots of lawsuits.

    • Arizona says:

      THANK YOU!!!!

      also, it’s not a requirement for anyone acting in the movie to read the book first.

      and not for nothing, we’re acting like this is a great literature novel that seriously deals with domestic assault. it’s not. it’s a shitty Colleen Hoover book. let’s bring it down a notch here.

      • Jais says:

        Shitty book or not there’s a lot CH fans out there who wanted to see the film. I don’t think an actor has to have read the book. And I think the scriptwriter has the freedom to choose how closely to adhere or deviate from the source. But Blake and Ryan rewrote a scene. So yeah I’m sorry but in that case blake was not just an actor but a scriptwriter and I do think familiarity with the source material in that case would be good? This has nothing to do with the SH and I’m not saying it proves JB isn’t guilty of SH.

      • Jais says:

        Sorry, just coming back to say that I think a better point to make is that whether blake read the book or not is a detail that has nothing to do with SH. Who cares if she read the book in regards to whether JB committed the act of sexual harassment. But saying blake was just an actor when that’s not the truth if she was rewriting scenes is giving a distracting detail more legitimacy imo. I’m sure there are many people besides blake who write scenes without reading the source. But again the whole point is that having read the book or not, whether we think it’s important or not, has nothing to do with SH and it’s there to shape our opinion of Blake. I just don’t think it helps Blake’s case to defend her by saying well she was only an actor when she has publicly stated she did rewrite scenes. If you want to argue that one doesn’t need to have read the source material to rewrite scenes, then fair.

    • Polly says:

      Thank you! This is exactly what abusers do! It’s not clever, they all do it! Because muddying the waters works.

  2. Smile says:

    So messy!

  3. SarahMcK says:

    I read that the movie was delayed six months by the strikes so originally the booze launch and movie weren’t supposed to be at the same time.

  4. Ginger says:

    It makes considering how she was promoting the movie. She was selling it as a cute rom com instead of a movie about domestic violence. His lawsuit is long and he brought the receipts. I am interested in how this all plays out.

    • sevenblue says:

      Didn’t Blake show the documentation that that was the studio’s marketing plan and she and all the other actors were following the plan?

      • Sassy says:

        @sevenblue yes

      • GJ says:

        You’re correct @Sevenblue. Blake attached a memo from Sony on how to promote the movie which was to emphasis female triumph. Baldoni followed Sony’s playbook but then he and his PR team decided to have him divert from the playbook to emphasize domestic violence.

      • sevenblue says:

        Thank you @GJ for further info. And Justin was following social media reactions religiously because his team was monitoring their campaign against Blake. So, they have seen the bad reactions against the official marketing plan and immediately changed lines to emphasize what a nice guy Justin is. The manipulation is insane and people still falling for it are making me speechless.

      • Eurydice says:

        @GJ – this has always been confusing to me about the marketing. Female triumph is not rom-com. And how can the female be triumphant if we don’t know over what she’s triumphing? (And that’s more times than I’ve used the word triumph in many, many years.)

    • seaflower says:

      It will be interesting to see how it plays out. The emails prior to the formal agreement between JB and the author where the author is at pains to point out this is a domestic violence story, not a romcom and her concerns that Hollywood would try to make it a romcom given her previous experiences with movies were very interesting.

    • AD says:

      He sure did!

  5. Tenesha says:

    It’s BAFFLING that this absolutely dog sh-t of a movie has so much drama associated with it. At least Don’t Worry Darling was pretty good about 30% of the way through and Florence Pugh was genuinely wonderful in the lead role. Lively and every actor in this film was miscast and there wasn’t a single speck of chemistry between anyone.

    I think Baldoni absolutely did something bad here. The way his attorney screams grifter is too obvious. I also think that Lively was probably awful to work with which still doesn’t excuse anyone harassing. All that to say, I don’t see how Lively recovers from any of this. Baldoni will fade into obscurity but Lively, despite not an acclaimed actress or actual movie star, is a name and married to someone who is equally polarizing who is also a name. Her businesses are attached to her name, not a quality product. Playing this out in the press is absolutely insane for both parties but especially her because she’s the bigger name!

    Anyway, team Leighton Meester.

  6. sevenblue says:

    Ughh, they are gonna throw everything to the wall in order to make everyone forget what Justin did allegedly. Reading the two different recollections for “it smells so good” part, Blake’s recollection is soo familiar. It reminds me of guys groping your side boob “by accident” while taking a photo or caressing your back creepily and making you be the bad guy for being creeped out. He and his legal team are literally gonna turn her into Amber Heard. It feels like even if you are a rich, powerful woman in the industry, it is better for you just to ignore harassment, otherwise the guy can make you the most hated woman of the month on social media.

  7. HeatherC says:

    I love civil lawsuits. (I’m not a lawyer) I mean, come on, how can you not laugh that making him feel more insecure about his nose, thinking NicePool was solely based on him, and BL not reading the book is worth $400 million dollars. (I know it’s more than that but I needed a good laugh today)

    • Lucy says:

      Yes! All of those things are ridiculous 😂 I also love the bananas reasoning.

      She shouldn’t have trash talked his nose, but he points out he’s talked about how insecure he is about his nose on his podcast.
      He’s assuming an actress who didn’t read the book listened to however many hours of his podcast to find something he was insecure about (which maybe says more about how far he goes when’s he’s off the rails). And I would wonder if it was before or after he made comments about her appearance.
      If after, hilarious retaliation (I once called a man in his 60s cupcake until one of his peers asked what was wrong with me, I was being called Sugar by the man in his 60s. My boss took care of it). If before, absolutely bonkers 😂

  8. LM says:

    I think his media campaign against her is still well underway AND still working surprisingly well.
    His lawsuits against the NYT and Lively do little to make me think differently of him. Lively doesn’t need to be perfect to be a victim and I find his posturing off-putting. He is not saying he didn’t do the things she accused him of, he is merely pointing out other things that might make people continue to think less of her. No, thank you.

  9. Miranda says:

    OK, BL just deciding that her character is rich because she wants to wear $5000 shoes is some hilariously vapid nonsense and maybe kinda genius? Did she have something in her contract that she would get to keep her wardrobe or something?

  10. Goldie says:

    One advantage that Blake has over Justin is the fact that the New York Times wrote a detailed summary of her complaint. So, even if you didn’t read her lawsuit, you get the gist of it by reading the NYT. Justin OTOH, doesn’t have a big newspaper like NYT in his corner. So the only way to really understand his perspective is to take the time to read his lawsuit. I’ve read about 90 pages so far and he does provide a lot of context that challenge Blake’s claims. It seems most commenters here haven’t read it.

    • Celebitchy says:

      Exactly. While I haven’t read this lawsuit yet (I will) I did read his earlier filing in full and this is well put
      -edit – Here is a link to the PDF of this lawsuit

      • Goldie says:

        Thank you Celebitchy!

      • Nivz says:

        Thanks Celebitchy.

        This is a weird story in which the comments section is completely at odds! Usually everyone is in lockstep about Meghan, Angelina, etc. I just read his lawsuit. He refutes every single one of the 17 point protections for return to work document.

        And not surprisingly, people are getting awfully personal about those who don’t agree with their chosen stance. Yeeesh.

        I’ll say one thing I noticed in the timeline of the lawsuit. She was fine, friendly, collaborative before the strikes. During the strikes, she asks for raw footage that he is editing. He checks with his co producers, then diplomatically says “not yet.” That seems to be what started things off.

    • Yawn says:

      Thanks to both.

  11. StillDouchesOfCambridge says:

    So messy
    Gossip goldmine though.
    I dont know anything, but my feeling is that Blake is a natural organic superficial Karen 1000% entitled btch like we have all seen her. Makes her look like an unserious actress and a selfish one not to want to meet with No more.
    It doesnt mean justin didnt do ehatbshe claims, but at the same time, he is also suing her. He is the underdog here, if I was in his shoes working with blake and her rich hollywood husband, I would have felt like im always walking on eggs at my every move, so I have doubts and although everything is possible, I feel like this is retaliation from BL. let’s see. So messy!

    • Margot says:

      Baldoni is disgusting and I’m not interested in listening to him whine about Blake not reading that terrible book. Many actors insist on working from the script rather than the book.

  12. Thesunandthefish says:

    For everyone commenting on what this has to do with the specific sexual harassment claims: 100% it does not.

    But please bother to read Baldoni’s lawsuit before you make sweeping statements about his defence. He addresses those specific instances and provides a plausible alternative account that is supported by his own evidence. I’m not saying his account all of a sudden emerges as the victor, but his side is at least making sure to dispute each and every single claim without resorting to victim-blaming tactics.

    There’s a logic to the suit. This particular point wasn’t addressing the birthing scene for example. You all can go find that and evaluate it for yourselves.

  13. MrsBanjo says:

    JJ Abrams not only proudly talked about not watching nor caring about Star Trek when he took on the reboot 09 movies, no one but those of us die-hard Trekkies seemed to give a shit. And Trek is beloved and has been around for over half a century.

    Michael Gambon didn’t bother to read any of HP before taking on Dumbledore. Again, few actually cared at the time. This happens all the time.

    • Serena says:

      Sure but then you follow the script and director, instead of making up things about your character that just create confusion.

  14. T says:

    Are people ignoring the fact that the claims in her complaint are contradicted by his lawsuit. She made claims that his is able to dispute with actual proof. For instance, she was the one that was inappropriately kissing him. They have video evidence. She claims that he was smelling her and said that she smells good but she initiated the conversation by apologizing for her spray tan. She didn’t realize that there is audio contradicting her. Bringing up her lack of knowledge of the book is important because the lawsuit breaks down how she kept breaking character and doing inappropriate things to him. She says that she was interacting with him the same way that she would interact with her husband which is opposite of her character. This once again contradicts her claim that she was harassed. The one thing that the so-what people are forgetting is that if she was really being harassed her agent, attorney, publicist, and anyone connected to her, her husband, or parents would have been on that set every day to make sure she was protected. We aren’t hearing that happened. We’re only hearing about Ryan coming to the set. They didn’t get SAG involved. SAG would have shut the set down until the issues were corrected. Everyone is twisting themselves in knots to avoid the thought of maybe she is not telling the truth. Has Blake provided any evidence? Her texts evidence is contradicted by the full text messages that he has released.

    • JJ says:

      Yeah. He does provide evidence in the complaint or says he has tape to contradict a lot of what BL alleged in hers.

    • Kitten says:

      I mean of course his lawsuit is going to contradict hers–that’s kinda how lawsuits work lol?

      “For instance, she was the one that was inappropriately kissing him. They have video evidence.”

      LOL ok I’ll wait to see that video because “I have a video” isn’t actual proof.
      Honestly, out of all the dubious allegations in his lawsuit “No actually Blake Lively was the one who tried to aggressively and inappropriately make out with ME” might be the most unbelievable. She’s a happily married woman who clearly reviled Baldoni since he first started acting inappropriately towards her. No way in HELL was she trying to get extra suck-face from this guy.

      That being said, the prolonged kiss accusation is one of the weaker allegations in her lawsuit. I can see how lines could get blurred in the creative process–actors testing different styles of kissing during various takes etc. But then again, that’s what an intimacy coordinator is for.

    • Arizona says:

      he SAYS he has evidence in the same way his lawyers SAID they would release stuff that showed she was wrong. still waiting.

      • sevenblue says:

        lol. His team is playing Trump’s playbook. I heard Trump is gonna show his health plan any day now. He said it is ready.

  15. Jillybean says:

    Lucky her for not wasting her time on that crap from Colleen Hoover. I still wish I could take back that one awful book in wasted ten hours on

  16. Brassy Rebel says:

    This all makes my head spin. But it does raise one interesting question. I wonder if Marlon Brando ever read The Godfather. 🤔 (Yes, I understand this movie is definitely not The Godfather. Imagine the lawsuits THAT could have spun off!)

  17. Elisa M says:

    What stands out to me more than this he said/she said is that the author of the book as well as almost all of the primary actors of the film have come out in defense of Blake, as well as cut off ties with Justin Baldoni during the promotion of the film. Not only that, but his female podcast parter quit. Say what you will, but the people who were there to see, hear and experience the reality of whatever happened are not on his side. NOT A GOOD LOOK. And this is coming from someone who has no real affection for Blake Lively and loves Jane the Virgin and really does not want to believe that Rafael would do this. And yet……

  18. Serena says:

    Yeah, I’m not surprised she didn’t want to meet with the DV charity seeing how she’s been behaving all throughout the movie promotion (even if you were instructed by the studio to take thr matter lightly, a bit of empathy goes a long way).
    Lively seems like a grade A a-hole, regardless this doesn’t really seem to respond to the main points of her lawsuit. I’m waiting for hard proof on that from Baldoni’s camp.

  19. Stef says:

    The fact that she couldn’t even be bothered to read a fairly easy book is interesting. Kinda seems she wanted to create her own character based on who she saw in the script. This would annoy any Director (not that I’m defending his abhorrent behaviour). She’s never struck me as an intellect or a real reader. Surely, her not reading the book shocks no one.

    There’s nothing quite like watching a movie where the two lead romantic characters f*cking HATE eachother…

    • Margot says:

      Isn’t it pretty common for actors to work off the script being filmed rather than the book? Not sure why that would annoy the director.

  20. IFoxi says:

    I mean, Elijah Wood hadn’t read any of LOTR before they filmed it, but nobody seemed to care.

    What an eyeroll JB seems to be.

Commenting Guidelines

Read the article before commenting.

We aim to be a friendly, welcoming site where people can discuss entertainment stories and current events in a lighthearted, safe environment without fear of harassment, excessive negativity, or bullying. Different opinions, backgrounds, ages, and nationalities are welcome here - hatred and bigotry are not. If you make racist or bigoted remarks, comment under multiple names, or wish death on anyone you will be banned. There are no second chances if you violate one of these basic rules.

By commenting you agree to our comment policy and our privacy policy

Do not engage with trolls, contrarians or rude people. Comment "troll" and we will see it.

Please e-mail the moderators at cbcomments at gmail.com to delete a comment if it's offensive or spam. If your comment disappears, it may have been eaten by the spam filter. Please email us to get it retrieved.

You can sign up to get an image next to your name at Gravatar.com Thank you!

Leave a comment after you have read the article

Save my name and email in this browser for the next time I comment