Buckingham Palace privately asked if King Charles should open parliament today

Here are some photos of King Charles and consort Camilla at a Buckingham Palace garden party on Tuesday. Charles and Camilla were supported by the Gloucesters, and it doesn’t look like any other working royals or royal-adjacents came out for the garden party. You know Prince Edward and Sophie are tired at being called in to beef up the garden-party ranks! Camilla repeated an Anna Valentine coat and she dusted off the Queen Mother’s Cartier palm brooch, an absolutely massive diamond “paisley.”

Meanwhile, Charles and Camilla will be out and about in London today for the state opening of Parliament. Charles is due to give the King’s Speech, and I would guess that there will be healthy anti-monarchy protests outside of Buckingham Palace and Parliament. Unfortunately, Charles and the monarchy are not the only unpopular ones in this equation – Keir Starmer is mired in controversy and his prime ministership is hanging on by a thread. Apparently, Starmer’s approval ratings are so low, there were some palace concerns about whether the King’s Speech should be delayed or canceled outright.

Buckingham Palace privately asked whether King Charles III should proceed as planned with the ceremonial state opening of parliament on Wednesday, as Keir Starmer faces a mounting leadership crisis that threatens to force him out of office.

According to people familiar with the matter, granted anonymity to speak freely, the king’s team made clear in conversation with Starmer’s officials the importance of protecting the monarch from any impression that he is being used for political ends.

“The Palace view is ‘we do not want to be any part of this conversation — do not bring us into it,’” said one of the people familiar with the matter.

This week, Starmer and his allies have pointed to Wednesday’s scheduled parliamentary ceremony as a key reason to let him keep his job despite crushing losses in local elections last week — and have dangled the promise of ambitious reforms, including the full nationalization of British Steel, in the coming address.

Parliament is currently between sessions, and must be formally opened to consider state business. The centerpiece of the opening ceremony is the king’s speech, which the monarch delivers to lawmakers from the gilded throne in the House of Lords. In this address, which is largely written by the prime minister’s team, the king sets out the government’s legislative plans for months ahead. But there is no certainty that those plans will survive amid a growing revolt against Starmer’s leadership from furious Labour MPs who blame him for their party’s dismal polling and disastrous election results last week.

According to the people familiar with the matter, in one recent discussion Charles’s senior aide asked top government officials including Cabinet Secretary Antonia Romeo whether the king should go ahead with Wednesday’s ceremony.

The Palace was told that it was constitutionally correct for the king to open parliament on Wednesday as planned, the people said. Unless parliament is formally convened again, MPs and members of the House of Lords cannot meet there to debate priorities, question ministers or pass new laws.

But in the discussions with the Palace, which also included Starmer’s office, there was a general acknowledgement that this year’s ceremony would be an awkward moment for the king.

“It is very embarrassing for the king that his government is such a shambles that he has to read out something that may or may not still be the government’s program by the end of the week,” according to the same person quoted above.

The Palace made clear that the king would fulfill his constitutional duties as required but that it should be for the politicians to handle the political crisis and the monarch should not be involved. The state opening marks the formal start to the new parliamentary session. It is full of pageantry, including soldiers on horseback, trumpet fanfares, and a horse-drawn carriage taking the king from Buckingham Palace to the Palace of Westminster.

[From Politico]

It reminds me of Charles’ first days as king in 2022, and when Liz Truss had her first audience with the new king, the first words out his mouth were “oh dear.” Truss barely held on for a month after that. Like, Charles’ relationships with his prime ministers have not been similar to his mother’s relationships with her PMs. Truss, Rishi Sunak and now Starmer… what a motley crew. What’s sad is that Charles actually gets along pretty well with Starmer. But yeah, the knives are really out for poor Keir and it’s got to hurt that palace officials were like “Starmer is politically radioactive, we don’t want any part of this!” Still, you know Charles enjoys any opportunity to wear all of the state jewels, so at least that’s one thing to look forward to. I hope Republic has a big protest scheduled!

Photos courtesy of Cover Images.

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

19 Responses to “Buckingham Palace privately asked if King Charles should open parliament today”

  1. harriet says:

    A paisley shape is called a boteh.

  2. Julie says:

    Given the economic hell the UK was when he was elected and still is. The hostilities are not surprised. People expected too much and too fast. It would have been a disaster to change govt now as the world is in chaos mostly because of the US pig.
    This said, some changes are required and it’s hoped Starmer will be more audacious and listen more to those who have some good idea.
    As for the king speech, this maybe should be something to change as it is ridiculous that man seated on a throne speaks to the people about economy and hard times.

  3. Amy Bee says:

    Unless the Palace was told that Starmer was resigning, they should have just sent Charles out to do his job and not ask any questions. I saw some right winger saying he felt sorry for Charles because he was put in his situation. Charles’ job is to do what the Government tells him to do.

    • kirk says:

      I don’t understand why the PM’s popularity should have any effect on whether the monarch and his consort show up to do their job? Whatever. He could be like Queen Vicky who only bothered to show up six times between 1862 and 1886 after her beloved Albert died, and she mostly showed up in black mourning clothes. While she was skipping most of those Parliamentary openings, she just sent Lord Chancellor to read the speech. Parliament was opened by commission in her absence.

  4. heygingersnaps says:

    I live in the UK and when Labour were elected as voters finally rejected the tories after years of austerity and cronyism, I was optimistic but some scoffed and told me that they were skeptical that things will change.
    I recognise that they are slightly better than the tories but they are also beholden to their donors which is very disappointing to say the least.
    Labour has also continued to have peaceful protesters standing up for Gaza arrested. They have let the US army used British bases to launch attacks against Iran and Lebanon essentially supporting the illegal us/israel war against Iran and Lebanon.
    They have given Palantir access to NHS patients records and the current health secretary wes streeting seems to be in the pocket of health insurance companies.
    They haven’t tax wealthy people and corporations but instead have gone on to squeeze normal workers and small businesses. It’s not sustainable. I am alarmed that reformed councillors have been elected in a number of wards here in Sheffield and other cities. The current labour government doesn’t seem to be different to the tories.

    • Digital Unicorn says:

      Starmer has no choice but to resign the party has effectively turned on him – Labour is a party of snakes just like the Tories are and they have a history of turning on their leaders at the first sniff of any weakness. If he is to survive as PM then he’s going to have to bend over to certain factions in the party.

      I don’t know much about Streeting but as long as the any new leader is NOT Rayner – I can’t stand her, she’s as power hungry and corrupt as the rest of them.

      • heygingersnaps says:

        I don’t trust streeting, he has opened the NHS to Palantir amongst other things and seems to be open to selling the NHS to the highest bidder.
        I don’t see starmer compromising with other Labour MPs, it’s always been his way or the highway.

    • kirk says:

      Why has Palantir been given access to NHS patient records? As in, what’s the formal reason given, as well as what you suspect.

      • heygingersnaps says:

        My thoughts would be their donations to politicians for access. streeting has not been shy in his thoughts about pushing to privatise the NHS.
        It’s all over the news, a quick web search for palantir and nhs will give you a lot of articles.
        I hope I’m allowed to post a link https://cybernews.com/tech/palantir-nhs-patient-data/

        “Why would the NHS give these privileges to Palantir?

        The US spy-tech company is deeply embedded in British governmental affairs, playing many roles and wearing many hats.
        The UK has been heavily dependent on Palantir for its infrastructure since 2020 and has since secured an almost $324 million (£240 million) deal with Britain’s Ministry of Defense, according to Politico.
        This deal reportedly didn’t go through a tendering process and was simply awarded to Palantir.
        The fair tech organization FoxGlove has demanded that the UK government publish the details behind Prime Minister Keir Starmer’s secret trip to Palantir headquarters with Britain’s former US ambassador, Peter Mandelson.
        FoxGlove seems to believe that Palantir was awarded the contract under the table during the PM’s trip to Washington.”

      • kirk says:

        So apparently not even a formal reason given…

  5. Elizabeth says:

    Interesting that William hasn’t been showing up to the State Opening of Parliament, as KCIII did when he was the Prince of Wales.

  6. Ameerah M says:

    Starmer is on his way out. If he was smart he would just resign. 50 Labour MPs signed a petition telling him to resign. Reform just won a bunch of MP positions and the Green Party is overtaking Labour. He has destroyed the Labour party from within (which was the plan)

    • heygingersnaps says:

      reform won a number of councillor positions from the recent local elections. They aren’t MP’s.

      • Ameerah M says:

        @heygingersnaps – thanks for the correction! I follow British politics but I am not up on all of the political titles. It’s very different from here in the States

      • Digital Unicorn says:

        Sadly a lot of the Reform voters don’t seem to understand that – these new councillors won’t be stopping any new ‘boats’. Its going to be all about pot holes and bin collections – once the idiots who voted for them realise that they are lame ducks they will turn on them.

  7. YankeeDoodles says:

    The monarchy really was better suited to a time when the U.K. was the metropole of a global empire. The late Queen managed the epic gear shift to an isolated and austere outpost of militant socialism with her legendary discretion and wisdom. But it took epic discipline to retain the gravitas of the institution amidst a change that would have wrecked a less judicious head of state. She was the real deal. This lot? Phffffff.

  8. Becks1 says:

    I feel Charles not attending or not giving a speech would be hugely political as well. This is his job and he is paid handsomely to do it, so he should just get on with it, whether or not the palace thinks its political.

    I really like that white dress Camilla is wearing. That may be the best thing she’s worn in a while. That was apparently the last garden party of the year at Buckingham Palace. Only three? I feel like there are usually 4 or 5.

Commenting Guidelines

Read the article before commenting.

We aim to be a friendly, welcoming site where people can discuss entertainment stories and current events in a lighthearted, safe environment without fear of harassment, excessive negativity, or bullying. Different opinions, backgrounds, ages, and nationalities are welcome here - hatred and bigotry are not. If you make racist or bigoted remarks, comment under multiple names, or wish death on anyone you will be banned. There are no second chances if you violate one of these basic rules.

By commenting you agree to our comment policy and our privacy policy

Do not engage with trolls, contrarians or rude people. Comment "troll" and we will see it.

Please e-mail the moderators at cbcomments at gmail.com to delete a comment if it's offensive or spam. If your comment disappears, it may have been eaten by the spam filter. Please email us to get it retrieved.

You can sign up to get an image next to your name at Gravatar.com Thank you!

Leave a comment after you have read the article

Save my name and email in this browser for the next time I comment